Heterogeneity in Multi-Robot Environmental Monitoring for Resolving Time-Conflicting Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.08813v1
• Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2025 17:06:21 GMT
• Title: Heterogeneity in Multi-Robot Environmental Monitoring for Resolving Time-Conflicting Tasks
• Abstract summary: Multi-robot systems performing continuous tasks face a performance trade-off when interrupted by urgent, time-critical sub-tasks.<n>We investigate this trade-off in a scenario where a team must balance area patrolling with locating an anomalous radio signal.<n>Our findings demonstrate that pre-deployment role and sensing specialization are powerful design considerations for multi-robot systems facing time-conflicting tasks.
• Score: 0.3779860024918729
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Multi-robot systems performing continuous tasks face a performance trade-off when interrupted by urgent, time-critical sub-tasks. We investigate this trade-off in a scenario where a team must balance area patrolling with locating an anomalous radio signal. To address this trade-off, we evaluate both behavioral heterogeneity through agent role specialization ("patrollers" and "searchers") and sensing heterogeneity (i.e., only the searchers can sense the radio signal). Through simulation, we identify the Pareto-optimal trade-offs under varying team compositions, with behaviorally heterogeneous teams demonstrating the most balanced trade-offs in the majority of cases. When sensing capability is restricted, heterogeneous teams with half of the sensing-capable agents perform comparably to homogeneous teams, providing cost-saving rationale for restricting sensor payload deployment. Our findings demonstrate that pre-deployment role and sensing specialization are powerful design considerations for multi-robot systems facing time-conflicting tasks, where varying the degree of behavioral heterogeneity can tune system performance toward either task.

Related papers

• CoRE-VLA: Towards Scalable and Robust Vision-Language-Action Modeling via Conditional Routing of Experts [79.70951193831506]
  Vision-language-action (VLA) models have advanced generalist robotic manipulation, yet real-world deployment reveals a fundamental challenge.<n>We propose CoRE-VLA, a scalable computation and robust VLA framework that formulates action generation as context-conditioned sparse computation.<n>Experiments on LIBERO, RoboCasa GR1 Tabletop, and real-world dual-arm manipulation show that CoRE-VLA achieves strong results on long-horizon and multi-task benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-04T03:58:09Z)
• Artificial collectives of specialists and generalists excel at different tasks [1.7266027274320124]
  We show how agent interpretive abilities, rationality bounds, and task qualities interact to shape collective performance.<n>Agents range from specialists, with narrow interpretive abilities, to generalists, with broad ones.<n>Findings suggest that multi-agent design could benefit from matching interpretive networks to both task demands and agents' computational limits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-18T19:08:36Z)
• Beyond Individual Intelligence: Surveying Collaboration, Failure Attribution, and Self-Evolution in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems [65.90791804095561]
  Multi-agent systems address this through structured collaboration among specialized agents, but tighter coordination amplifies a less explored risk.<n>Existing surveys cover individual agent capabilities, multi-agent collaboration, or agent self-evolution separately, leaving the causal dependencies among them unexamined.<n>This survey provides a unified review organized around four causally linked stages, which we term the LIFE progression: Lay the capability foundation, Integrate agents through collaboration, Find faults through attribution, and Evolve through autonomous self-improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-14T14:36:13Z)
• Towards a Virtual Neuroscientist: Autonomous Neuroimaging Analysis via Multi-Agent Collaboration [53.772014300855375]
  We introduce NIAgent, a multi-agent system for autonomous end-to-end neuroimaging analysis.<n>Unlike conventional flat tool-calling agents, NIAgent adopts a code-centric execution paradigm.<n>We propose a hierarchical verification framework for autonomous quality control, integrating cohort-level metric screening with agentic visual inspection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-10T06:30:19Z)
• Taming Actor-Observer Asymmetry in Agents via Dialectical Alignment [59.536125286960186]
  Multi-agent frameworks assigning specialized roles are increasingly adopted to enable self-reflection and mutual auditing.<n>We find it simultaneously induces a human-like cognitive bias known as Actor-Observer Asymmetry.<n>ReTAS guides agents to synthesize conflicting viewpoints into an objective consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-21T15:05:58Z)
• Heterogeneous Consensus-Progressive Reasoning for Efficient Multi-Agent Debate [58.675713546748305]
  Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) is a collaborative framework in which multiple agents iteratively refine solutions through the generation of reasoning and alternating critique cycles.<n>This work introduces Heterogeneous Consensus-Progressive Reasoning for Efficient Multi-Agent Debate (HCP-MAD)<n>HCP-MAD employs a three-stage progressive reasoning mechanism to develop adaptive solutions across varying task complexities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-03T06:58:59Z)
• Beyond Task Performance: A Metric-Based Analysis of Sequential Cooperation in Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Destructive Foraging [41.439643274006364]
  This work addresses the problem of analyzing cooperation in heterogeneous multi-agent systems.<n>The proposed suite of metrics is structured into three main categories that jointly provide a multilevel characterization of cooperation.<n>They have been validated in a realistic destructive foraging scenario inspired by dynamic aquatic surface cleaning using heterogeneous autonomous vehicles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T09:39:24Z)
• What Do LLM Agents Know About Their World? Task2Quiz: A Paradigm for Studying Environment Understanding [50.35012849818872]
  Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex decision-making and tool-use tasks.<n>We propose Task-to-Quiz (T2Q), a deterministic and automated evaluation paradigm designed to decouple task execution from world-state understanding.<n>Our experiments reveal that task success is often a poor proxy for environment understanding, and that current memory machanism can not effectively help agents acquire a grounded model of the environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-14T14:09:11Z)
• When Is Diversity Rewarded in Cooperative Multi-Agent Learning? [11.526906471052868]
  We study what kinds of objectives are best suited for heterogeneous teams.<n>We use multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) as our computational paradigm.<n>We show that HetGPS rediscovers the reward regimes predicted by our theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T06:33:55Z)
• Collaborative Value Function Estimation Under Model Mismatch: A Federated Temporal Difference Analysis [55.13545823385091]
  Federated reinforcement learning (FedRL) enables collaborative learning while preserving data privacy by preventing direct data exchange between agents.<n>In real-world applications, each agent may experience slightly different transition dynamics, leading to inherent model mismatches.<n>We show that even moderate levels of information sharing significantly mitigate environment-specific errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T18:06:28Z)
• When Disagreements Elicit Robustness: Investigating Self-Repair Capabilities under LLM Multi-Agent Disagreements [56.29265568399648]
  We argue that disagreements prevent premature consensus and expand the explored solution space.<n>Disagreements on task-critical steps can derail collaboration depending on the topology of solution paths.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T02:24:43Z)
• AgentAlign: Misalignment-Adapted Multi-Agent Perception for Resilient Inter-Agent Sensor Correlations [8.916036880001734]
  Existing research overlooks the fragile multi-sensor correlations in multi-agent settings.<n>AgentAlign is a real-world heterogeneous agent cross-modality feature alignment framework.<n>We present a novel V2XSet-noise dataset that simulates realistic sensor imperfections under diverse environmental conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-09T01:51:18Z)
• Robust Collaborative Perception without External Localization and Clock Devices [52.32342059286222]
  A consistent spatial-temporal coordination across multiple agents is fundamental for collaborative perception. Traditional methods depend on external devices to provide localization and clock signals. We propose a novel approach: aligning by recognizing the inherent geometric patterns within the perceptual data of various agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-05T15:20:36Z)
• System Neural Diversity: Measuring Behavioral Heterogeneity in Multi-Agent Learning [8.280943341629161]
  We introduce System Neural Diversity (SND): a measure of behavioral heterogeneity in multi-agent systems. We show how SND allows us to measure latent resilience skills acquired by the agents, while other proxies, such as task performance (reward), fail. We demonstrate how this paradigm can be used to bootstrap the exploration phase, finding optimal policies faster.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-03T13:58:13Z)
• A Framework for Automatic Behavior Generation in Multi-Function Swarms [1.290382979353427]
  A framework for automatic behavior generation in multi-function swarms is proposed. The framework is tested on a scenario with three simultaneous tasks. The effect of noise on the behavior characteristics in MAP-elites is investigated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-11T20:50:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.