Differentially Private Synthetic Data Generation Using Context-Aware GANs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.08869v1
• Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2025 18:02:34 GMT
• Title: Differentially Private Synthetic Data Generation Using Context-Aware GANs
• Authors: Anantaa Kotal, Anupam Joshi,
• Abstract summary: We propose ContextGAN, a Context-Aware Differentially Private Generative Adversarial Network that integrates domain-specific rules.<n>We show that ContextGAN produces high-quality synthetic data that respects domain rules and preserves privacy.<n>Our results demonstrate that ContextGAN improves realism and utility by enforcing domain constraints.
• Score: 1.440541589945769
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The widespread use of big data across sectors has raised major privacy concerns, especially when sensitive information is shared or analyzed. Regulations such as GDPR and HIPAA impose strict controls on data handling, making it difficult to balance the need for insights with privacy requirements. Synthetic data offers a promising solution by creating artificial datasets that reflect real patterns without exposing sensitive information. However, traditional synthetic data methods often fail to capture complex, implicit rules that link different elements of the data and are essential in domains like healthcare. They may reproduce explicit patterns but overlook domain-specific constraints that are not directly stated yet crucial for realism and utility. For example, prescription guidelines that restrict certain medications for specific conditions or prevent harmful drug interactions may not appear explicitly in the original data. Synthetic data generated without these implicit rules can lead to medically inappropriate or unrealistic profiles. To address this gap, we propose ContextGAN, a Context-Aware Differentially Private Generative Adversarial Network that integrates domain-specific rules through a constraint matrix encoding both explicit and implicit knowledge. The constraint-aware discriminator evaluates synthetic data against these rules to ensure adherence to domain constraints, while differential privacy protects sensitive details from the original data. We validate ContextGAN across healthcare, security, and finance, showing that it produces high-quality synthetic data that respects domain rules and preserves privacy. Our results demonstrate that ContextGAN improves realism and utility by enforcing domain constraints, making it suitable for applications that require compliance with both explicit patterns and implicit rules under strict privacy guarantees.

Related papers

• How to DP-fy Your Data: A Practical Guide to Generating Synthetic Data With Differential Privacy [52.00934156883483]
  Differential Privacy (DP) is a framework for reasoning about and limiting information leakage.<n>Differentially Private Synthetic data refers to synthetic data that preserves the overall trends of source data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-02T21:14:39Z)
• PRIVET: Privacy Metric Based on Extreme Value Theory [8.447463478355845]
  Deep generative models are often trained on sensitive data, such as genetic sequences, health data, or more broadly, any copyrighted, licensed or protected content.<n>This raises critical concerns around privacy-preserving synthetic data, and more specifically around privacy leakage.<n>We propose PRIVET, a generic sample-based, modality-agnostic algorithm that assigns an individual privacy leak score to each synthetic sample.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-28T09:42:03Z)
• SynBench: A Benchmark for Differentially Private Text Generation [35.908455649647784]
  Data-driven decision support in high-stakes domains like healthcare and finance faces significant barriers to data sharing.<n>Recent generative AI models, such as large language models, have shown impressive performance in open-domain tasks.<n>But their adoption in sensitive environments remains limited by unpredictable behaviors and insufficient privacy-preserving datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-18T03:57:50Z)
• On the MIA Vulnerability Gap Between Private GANs and Diffusion Models [51.53790101362898]
  Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and diffusion models have emerged as leading approaches for high-quality image synthesis.<n>We present the first unified theoretical and empirical analysis of the privacy risks faced by differentially private generative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-03T14:18:22Z)
• Evaluating Differentially Private Generation of Domain-Specific Text [33.72321050465059]
  We introduce a unified benchmark to systematically evaluate the utility and fidelity of text datasets generated under Differential Privacy guarantees.<n>We assess state-of-the-art privacy-preserving generation methods across five domain-specific datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T05:57:47Z)
• RL-Finetuned LLMs for Privacy-Preserving Synthetic Rewriting [17.294176570269]
  We propose a reinforcement learning framework that fine-tunes a large language model (LLM) using a composite reward function.<n>The privacy reward combines semantic cues with structural patterns derived from a minimum spanning tree (MST) over latent representations.<n> Empirical results show that the proposed method significantly enhances author obfuscation and privacy metrics without degrading semantic quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-25T04:38:19Z)
• A False Sense of Privacy: Evaluating Textual Data Sanitization Beyond Surface-level Privacy Leakage [77.83757117924995]
  We propose a new framework that evaluates re-identification attacks to quantify individual privacy risks upon data release.<n>Our approach shows that seemingly innocuous auxiliary information can be used to infer sensitive attributes like age or substance use history from sanitized data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-28T01:16:27Z)
• KIPPS: Knowledge infusion in Privacy Preserving Synthetic Data Generation [0.0]
  Generative Deep Learning models struggle to model discrete and non-Gaussian features that have domain constraints. Generative models create synthetic data that repeats sensitive features, which is a privacy risk. This paper proposes a novel model, KIPPS, that infuses Domain and Regulatory Knowledge from Knowledge Graphs into Generative Deep Learning models for enhanced Privacy Preserving Synthetic data generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T19:50:03Z)
• PrivacyMind: Large Language Models Can Be Contextual Privacy Protection Learners [81.571305826793]
  We introduce Contextual Privacy Protection Language Models (PrivacyMind) Our work offers a theoretical analysis for model design and benchmarks various techniques. In particular, instruction tuning with both positive and negative examples stands out as a promising method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T22:37:01Z)
• A Unified View of Differentially Private Deep Generative Modeling [60.72161965018005]
  Data with privacy concerns comes with stringent regulations that frequently prohibited data access and data sharing. Overcoming these obstacles is key for technological progress in many real-world application scenarios that involve privacy sensitive data. Differentially private (DP) data publishing provides a compelling solution, where only a sanitized form of the data is publicly released.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T14:38:16Z)
• Distributed Machine Learning and the Semblance of Trust [66.1227776348216]
  Federated Learning (FL) allows the data owner to maintain data governance and perform model training locally without having to share their data. FL and related techniques are often described as privacy-preserving. We explain why this term is not appropriate and outline the risks associated with over-reliance on protocols that were not designed with formal definitions of privacy in mind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-21T08:44:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.