Agentic AI as Undercover Teammates: Argumentative Knowledge Construction in Hybrid Human-AI Collaborative Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.08933v1
• Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2025 14:26:15 GMT
• Title: Agentic AI as Undercover Teammates: Argumentative Knowledge Construction in Hybrid Human-AI Collaborative Learning
• Authors: Lixiang Yan, Yueqiao Jin, Linxuan Zhao, Roberto Martinez-Maldonado, Xinyu Li, Xiu Guan, Wenxin Guo, Xibin Han, Dragan Gašević,
• Abstract summary: Generative artificial intelligence (AI) agents are increasingly embedded in collaborative learning environments.<n>This study investigates how agentic AI, designed as undercover teammates with either supportive or contrarian personas, shapes the dynamics of collaborative reasoning.
• Score: 6.109253207492508
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence (AI) agents are increasingly embedded in collaborative learning environments, yet their impact on the processes of argumentative knowledge construction remains insufficiently understood. Emerging conceptualisations of agentic AI and artificial agency suggest that such systems possess bounded autonomy, interactivity, and adaptability, allowing them to engage as epistemic participants rather than mere instructional tools. Building on this theoretical foundation, the present study investigates how agentic AI, designed as undercover teammates with either supportive or contrarian personas, shapes the epistemic and social dynamics of collaborative reasoning. Drawing on Weinberger and Fischer's (2006) four-dimensional framework, participation, epistemic reasoning, argument structure, and social modes of co-construction, we analysed synchronous discourse data from 212 human and 64 AI participants (92 triads) engaged in an analytical problem-solving task. Mixed-effects and epistemic network analyses revealed that AI teammates maintained balanced participation but substantially reorganised epistemic and social processes: supportive personas promoted conceptual integration and consensus-oriented reasoning, whereas contrarian personas provoked critical elaboration and conflict-driven negotiation. Epistemic adequacy, rather than participation volume, predicted individual learning gains, indicating that agentic AI's educational value lies in enhancing the quality and coordination of reasoning rather than amplifying discourse quantity. These findings extend CSCL theory by conceptualising agentic AI as epistemic and social participants, bounded yet adaptive collaborators that redistribute cognitive and argumentative labour in hybrid human-AI learning environments.

Related papers

• Collaborative Causal Sensemaking: Closing the Complementarity Gap in Human-AI Decision Support [0.0]
  LLM-based agents are increasingly deployed for expert decision support.<n>Yet human-AI teams in high-stakes settings do not yet reliably outperform the best individual.<n>We argue this complementarity gap reflects a fundamental mismatch: current agents are trained as answer engines, not as partners in the collaborative sensemaking through which experts actually make decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-08T18:30:41Z)
• Classifying Epistemic Relationships in Human-AI Interaction: An Exploratory Approach [0.6906005491572401]
  This study examines how users form relationships with AI-how they assess, trust, and collaborate with it in research and teaching contexts.<n>Based on 31 interviews with academics across disciplines, we developed a five-part codebook and identified five relationship types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-02T23:41:28Z)
• (AI peers) are people learning from the same standpoint: Perception of AI characters in a Collaborative Science Investigation [0.0]
  scenario-based assessment (SBA) introduces simulated agents to provide an authentic social-interactional context.<n>Recent advancements in multimodal AI, such as text-to-video technology, allow these agents to be enhanced into AI-generated characters.<n>This study investigates how learners perceive AI characters taking the role of mentor and teammates in an SBA mirroring the context of a collaborative science investigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T15:29:11Z)
• Cognitio Emergens: Agency, Dimensions, and Dynamics in Human-AI Knowledge Co-Creation [0.5076419064097734]
  We introduce Cognitio Emergens (CE), a framework that captures the co-evolutionary nature of human-AI epistemic partnerships.<n>By reconceptualizing human-AI collaboration as fundamentally co-evolutionary, CE provides conceptual tools for cultivating partnerships that preserve epistemic integrity while enabling transformative breakthroughs neither humans nor AI could achieve independently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-06T01:49:44Z)
• Unraveling Human-AI Teaming: A Review and Outlook [2.3396455015352258]
  Artificial Intelligence (AI) is advancing at an unprecedented pace, with clear potential to enhance decision-making and productivity.<n>Yet, the collaborative decision-making process between humans and AI remains underdeveloped, often falling short of its transformative possibilities.<n>This paper explores the evolution of AI agents from passive tools to active collaborators in human-AI teams, emphasizing their ability to learn, adapt, and operate autonomously in complex environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-08T07:37:25Z)
• Aligning Generalisation Between Humans and Machines [74.120848518198]
  AI technology can support humans in scientific discovery and forming decisions, but may also disrupt democracies and target individuals.<n>The responsible use of AI and its participation in human-AI teams increasingly shows the need for AI alignment.<n>A crucial yet often overlooked aspect of these interactions is the different ways in which humans and machines generalise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T18:36:07Z)
• Causal Responsibility Attribution for Human-AI Collaboration [62.474732677086855]
  This paper presents a causal framework using Structural Causal Models (SCMs) to systematically attribute responsibility in human-AI systems. Two case studies illustrate the framework's adaptability in diverse human-AI collaboration scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T17:17:45Z)
• How Performance Pressure Influences AI-Assisted Decision Making [52.997197698288936]
  We show how pressure and explainable AI (XAI) techniques interact with AI advice-taking behavior.<n>Our results show complex interaction effects, with different combinations of pressure and XAI techniques either improving or worsening AI advice taking behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T22:39:52Z)
• Converging Paradigms: The Synergy of Symbolic and Connectionist AI in LLM-Empowered Autonomous Agents [55.63497537202751]
  Article explores the convergence of connectionist and symbolic artificial intelligence (AI) Traditionally, connectionist AI focuses on neural networks, while symbolic AI emphasizes symbolic representation and logic. Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) highlight the potential of connectionist architectures in handling human language as a form of symbols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T14:00:53Z)
• AI's Social Forcefield: Reshaping Distributed Cognition in Human-AI Teams [6.386909552513031]
  We show that AI actively reshapes the social and cognitive fabric of collaboration.<n>We show that AI participation reorganizes the distributed cognitive architecture of teams.<n>We argue for rethinking AI in teams as a socially influential actor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T13:46:00Z)
• Human-AI Coevolution [48.74579595505374]
  Coevolution AI is a process in which humans and AI algorithms continuously influence each other. This paper introduces Coevolution AI as the cornerstone for a new field of study at the intersection between AI and complexity science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-23T18:10:54Z)
• Stakeholder Participation in AI: Beyond "Add Diverse Stakeholders and Stir" [76.44130385507894]
  This paper aims to ground what we dub a 'participatory turn' in AI design by synthesizing existing literature on participation and through empirical analysis of its current practices. Based on our literature synthesis and empirical research, this paper presents a conceptual framework for analyzing participatory approaches to AI design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-01T17:57:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.