Cognitive Trust in HRI: "Pay Attention to Me and I'll Trust You Even if You are Wrong"

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.09105v1
• Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2025 20:41:29 GMT
• Title: Cognitive Trust in HRI: "Pay Attention to Me and I'll Trust You Even if You are Wrong"
• Abstract summary: Recent studies suggest that affective factors, such as robotic attentiveness, also play a role in building cognitive trust.<n>This work explores the interplay between these two factors that shape cognitive trust.
• Score: 7.65355434862112
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Cognitive trust and the belief that a robot is capable of accurately performing tasks, are recognized as central factors in fostering high-quality human-robot interactions. It is well established that performance factors such as the robot's competence and its reliability shape cognitive trust. Recent studies suggest that affective factors, such as robotic attentiveness, also play a role in building cognitive trust. This work explores the interplay between these two factors that shape cognitive trust. Specifically, we evaluated whether different combinations of robotic competence and attentiveness introduce a compensatory mechanism, where one factor compensates for the lack of the other. In the experiment, participants performed a search task with a robotic dog in a 2x2 experimental design that included two factors: competence (high or low) and attentiveness (high or low). The results revealed that high attentiveness can compensate for low competence. Participants who collaborated with a highly attentive robot that performed poorly reported trust levels comparable to those working with a highly competent robot. When the robot did not demonstrate attentiveness, low competence resulted in a substantial decrease in cognitive trust. The findings indicate that building cognitive trust in human-robot interaction may be more complex than previously believed, involving emotional processes that are typically overlooked. We highlight an affective compensatory mechanism that adds a layer to consider alongside traditional competence-based models of cognitive trust.

Related papers

• Robot Metacognition: Decision Making with Confidence for Tool Invention [0.3957768262206625]
  In humans, this self-monitoring or metacognition is crucial for learning, decision making and problem solving.<n>Taking inspiration from neuroscience, we propose a robot metacognition architecture centered on confidence.<n> Confidence-informed robots can evaluate the reliability of their decisions, improving their robustness during real-world physical deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-20T14:10:07Z)
• Truly Self-Improving Agents Require Intrinsic Metacognitive Learning [59.60803539959191]
  Self-improving agents aim to continuously acquire new capabilities with minimal supervision.<n>Current approaches face two key limitations: their self-improvement processes are often rigid, fail to generalize across tasks domains, and struggle to scale with increasing agent capabilities.<n>We argue that effective self-improvement requires intrinsic metacognitive learning, defined as an agent's intrinsic ability to actively evaluate, reflect on, and adapt its own learning processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T14:53:35Z)
• Human-Robot Interaction and Perceived Irrationality: A Study of Trust Dynamics and Error Acknowledgment [0.0]
  This study systematically examines trust dynamics and system design by analyzing human reactions to robot failures.<n>We conducted a four-stage survey to explore how trust evolves throughout human-robot interactions.<n>Results indicate that trust in robotic systems significantly increased when robots acknowledged their errors or limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T11:00:11Z)
• Common (good) practices measuring trust in HRI [55.2480439325792]
  Trust in robots is widely believed to be imperative for the adoption of robots into people's daily lives. Researchers have been exploring how people trust robot in different ways. Most roboticists agree that insufficient levels of trust lead to a risk of disengagement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T20:52:10Z)
• "Do it my way!": Impact of Customizations on Trust perceptions in Human-Robot Collaboration [0.8287206589886881]
  Personalization of assistive robots is positively correlated with robot adoption and user perceptions. Our findings indicate that increased levels of customization was associated with higher trust and comfort perceptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-28T19:31:40Z)
• A Diachronic Perspective on User Trust in AI under Uncertainty [52.44939679369428]
  Modern NLP systems are often uncalibrated, resulting in confidently incorrect predictions that undermine user trust. We study the evolution of user trust in response to trust-eroding events using a betting game.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T14:41:46Z)
• Trust as Extended Control: Active Inference and User Feedback During Human-Robot Collaboration [2.6381163133447836]
  Despite its crucial role, it is largely unknown how trust emerges, develops, and supports human interactions with nonhuman artefacts. We introduce a model of trust as an agent's best explanation for reliable sensory exchange with an extended motor plant or partner. We examine the role of shared behavior in the genesis of trust, especially in the context of dyadic collaboration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-22T16:11:22Z)
• AGENT: A Benchmark for Core Psychological Reasoning [60.35621718321559]
  Intuitive psychology is the ability to reason about hidden mental variables that drive observable actions. Despite recent interest in machine agents that reason about other agents, it is not clear if such agents learn or hold the core psychology principles that drive human reasoning. We present a benchmark consisting of procedurally generated 3D animations, AGENT, structured around four scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-24T14:58:23Z)
• Modeling Trust in Human-Robot Interaction: A Survey [1.4502611532302039]
  appropriate trust in robotic collaborators is one of the leading factors influencing the performance of human-robot interaction. For trust calibration in HRI, trust needs to be modeled first.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-09T21:56:34Z)
• Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AI [55.4046755826066]
  We discuss a model of trust inspired by, but not identical to, sociology's interpersonal trust (i.e., trust between people) We incorporate a formalization of 'contractual trust', such that trust between a user and an AI is trust that some implicit or explicit contract will hold. We discuss how to design trustworthy AI, how to evaluate whether trust has manifested, and whether it is warranted.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T03:07:23Z)
• Effect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Making [53.62514158534574]
  We study whether features that reveal case-specific model information can calibrate trust and improve the joint performance of the human and AI. We show that confidence score can help calibrate people's trust in an AI model, but trust calibration alone is not sufficient to improve AI-assisted decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-07T15:33:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.