MAC: A Multi-Agent Framework for Interactive User Clarification in Multi-turn Conversations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.13154v1
• Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 10:02:50 GMT
• Title: MAC: A Multi-Agent Framework for Interactive User Clarification in Multi-turn Conversations
• Authors: Emre Can Acikgoz, Jinoh Oh, Joo Hyuk Jeon, Jie Hao, Heng Ji, Dilek Hakkani-Tür, Gokhan Tur, Xiang Li, Chengyuan Ma, Xing Fan,
• Abstract summary: We propose an interactive multi-agent framework specifically optimized to resolve user ambiguities by strategically managing clarification dialogues.<n> Empirical evaluations on MultiWOZ 2.4 demonstrate that enabling clarification at both levels increases task success rate 7.8% (54.5 to 62.3) and reduces the average number of dialogue turns (6.53 to 4.86) by eliciting all required user information up front and minimizing repetition.
• Score: 46.70182219204539
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Conversational agents often encounter ambiguous user requests, requiring an effective clarification to successfully complete tasks. While recent advancements in real-world applications favor multi-agent architectures to manage complex conversational scenarios efficiently, ambiguity resolution remains a critical and underexplored challenge--particularly due to the difficulty of determining which agent should initiate a clarification and how agents should coordinate their actions when faced with uncertain or incomplete user input. The fundamental questions of when to interrupt a user and how to formulate the optimal clarification query within the most optimal multi-agent settings remain open. In this paper, we propose MAC (Multi-Agent Clarification), an interactive multi-agent framework specifically optimized to resolve user ambiguities by strategically managing clarification dialogues. We first introduce a novel taxonomy categorizing user ambiguities to systematically guide clarification strategies. Then, we present MAC that autonomously coordinates multiple agents to interact synergistically with users. Empirical evaluations on MultiWOZ 2.4 demonstrate that enabling clarification at both levels increases task success rate 7.8\% (54.5 to 62.3) and reduces the average number of dialogue turns (6.53 to 4.86) by eliciting all required user information up front and minimizing repetition. Our findings highlight the importance of active user interaction and role-aware clarification for more reliable human-agent communication.

Related papers

• ClarifyMT-Bench: Benchmarking and Improving Multi-Turn Clarification for Conversational Large Language Models [32.099137908375546]
  ClarifyMT-Bench is a benchmark for multi-turn clarification in large language models (LLMs)<n>We construct 6,120 multi-turn dialogues capturing diverse ambiguity sources and interaction patterns.<n>We propose textbfClarifyAgent, an agentic approach that decomposes clarification into perception, forecasting, tracking, and planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-24T11:39:00Z)
• Adaptive Multi-Agent Response Refinement in Conversational Systems [33.2240994465021]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable success in conversational systems by generating human-like responses.<n>They can fall short, especially when required to account for personalization or specific knowledge.<n>We propose refining responses through a multi-agent framework, where each agent is assigned a specific role for each aspect.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-11T14:48:34Z)
• OPTAGENT: Optimizing Multi-Agent LLM Interactions Through Verbal Reinforcement Learning for Enhanced Reasoning [14.105640933123325]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable reasoning capabilities in mathematical and scientific tasks.<n>To enhance complex reasoning, multi-agent systems have been proposed to harness the collective intelligence of LLM agents.<n>We propose $ours$, a multi-agent verbal reinforcement learning algorithm that dynamically constructs and refines multi-agent collaboration structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T19:07:51Z)
• AnyMAC: Cascading Flexible Multi-Agent Collaboration via Next-Agent Prediction [77.62279834617475]
  We propose a new framework that rethinks multi-agent coordination through a sequential structure rather than a graph structure.<n>Our method focuses on two key directions: (1) Next-Agent Prediction, which selects the most suitable agent role at each step, and (2) Next-Context Selection, which enables each agent to selectively access relevant information from any previous step.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-21T18:34:43Z)
• ECLAIR: Enhanced Clarification for Interactive Responses in an Enterprise AI Assistant [10.954831867440332]
  We introduce ECLAIR (Enhanced CLArification for Interactive Responses), a multi-agent framework for interactive disambiguation.<n>ECLAIR enhances ambiguous user query clarification through an interactive process where custom agents are defined, ambiguity reasoning is conducted by the agents, clarification questions are generated, and user feedback is leveraged to refine the final response.<n>When tested on real-world customer data, ECLAIR demonstrates significant improvements in clarification question generation compared to standard few-shot methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T23:13:34Z)
• InfoQuest: Evaluating Multi-Turn Dialogue Agents for Open-Ended Conversations with Hidden Context [4.262907114077643]
  Large language models excel at following explicit instructions, but they often struggle with ambiguous or incomplete user requests.<n>We introduce InfoQuest, a benchmark designed to evaluate how dialogue agents handle hidden context in open-ended user requests.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T19:01:10Z)
• ReSpAct: Harmonizing Reasoning, Speaking, and Acting Towards Building Large Language Model-Based Conversational AI Agents [11.118991548784459]
  Large language model (LLM)-based agents are increasingly employed to interact with external environments.<n>ReSpAct is designed to seamlessly integrate reasoning, decision-making, and dynamic dialogue for task-solving.<n>We evaluate ReSpAct in user-interactive settings, including task-oriented dialogue systems (MultiWOZ) and decision-making tasks (ALFWorld, WebShop)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T15:57:45Z)
• Adaptive In-conversation Team Building for Language Model Agents [33.03550687362213]
  Leveraging multiple large language model (LLM) agents has shown to be a promising approach for tackling complex tasks.<n>Our new adaptive team-building paradigm offers a flexible solution, realized through a novel agent design named Captain Agent.<n>A comprehensive evaluation across six real-world scenarios demonstrates that Captain Agent significantly outperforms existing multi-agent methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T18:08:37Z)
• Tell Me More! Towards Implicit User Intention Understanding of Language Model Driven Agents [110.25679611755962]
  Current language model-driven agents often lack mechanisms for effective user participation, which is crucial given the vagueness commonly found in user instructions. We introduce Intention-in-Interaction (IN3), a novel benchmark designed to inspect users' implicit intentions through explicit queries. We empirically train Mistral-Interact, a powerful model that proactively assesses task vagueness, inquires user intentions, and refines them into actionable goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T14:36:30Z)
• Multi-User MultiWOZ: Task-Oriented Dialogues among Multiple Users [51.34484827552774]
  We release the Multi-User MultiWOZ dataset: task-oriented dialogues among two users and one agent. These dialogues reflect interesting dynamics of collaborative decision-making in task-oriented scenarios. We propose a novel task of multi-user contextual query rewriting: to rewrite a task-oriented chat between two users as a concise task-oriented query.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T14:12:07Z)
• AgentCF: Collaborative Learning with Autonomous Language Agents for Recommender Systems [112.76941157194544]
  We propose AgentCF for simulating user-item interactions in recommender systems through agent-based collaborative filtering. We creatively consider not only users but also items as agents, and develop a collaborative learning approach that optimize both kinds of agents together. Overall, the optimized agents exhibit diverse interaction behaviors within our framework, including user-item, user-user, item-item, and collective interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T16:37:14Z)
• Cooperation, Competition, and Maliciousness: LLM-Stakeholders Interactive Negotiation [52.930183136111864]
  We propose using scorable negotiation to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) To reach an agreement, agents must have strong arithmetic, inference, exploration, and planning capabilities. We provide procedures to create new games and increase games' difficulty to have an evolving benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T13:33:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.