Scaling Laws for Code: Every Programming Language Matters

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.13472v1
• Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 16:07:34 GMT
• Title: Scaling Laws for Code: Every Programming Language Matters
• Authors: Jian Yang, Shawn Guo, Lin Jing, Wei Zhang, Aishan Liu, Chuan Hao, Zhoujun Li, Wayne Xin Zhao, Xianglong Liu, Weifeng Lv, Bryan Dai,
• Abstract summary: Code large language models (Code LLMs) are powerful but costly to train.<n>Different programming languages (PLs) have varying impacts during pre-training that significantly affect base model performance.<n>We present the first systematic exploration of scaling laws for multilingual code pre-training.
• Score: 73.6302896079007
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Code large language models (Code LLMs) are powerful but costly to train, with scaling laws predicting performance from model size, data, and compute. However, different programming languages (PLs) have varying impacts during pre-training that significantly affect base model performance, leading to inaccurate performance prediction. Besides, existing works focus on language-agnostic settings, neglecting the inherently multilingual nature of modern software development. Therefore, it is first necessary to investigate the scaling laws of different PLs, and then consider their mutual influences to arrive at the final multilingual scaling law. In this paper, we present the first systematic exploration of scaling laws for multilingual code pre-training, conducting over 1000+ experiments (Equivalent to 336,000+ H800 hours) across multiple PLs, model sizes (0.2B to 14B parameters), and dataset sizes (1T tokens). We establish comprehensive scaling laws for code LLMs across multiple PLs, revealing that interpreted languages (e.g., Python) benefit more from increased model size and data than compiled languages (e.g., Rust). The study demonstrates that multilingual pre-training provides synergistic benefits, particularly between syntactically similar PLs. Further, the pre-training strategy of the parallel pairing (concatenating code snippets with their translations) significantly enhances cross-lingual abilities with favorable scaling properties. Finally, a proportion-dependent multilingual scaling law is proposed to optimally allocate training tokens by prioritizing high-utility PLs (e.g., Python), balancing high-synergy pairs (e.g., JavaScript-TypeScript), and reducing allocation to fast-saturating languages (Rust), achieving superior average performance across all PLs compared to uniform distribution under the same compute budget.

Related papers

• ATLAS: Adaptive Transfer Scaling Laws for Multilingual Pretraining, Finetuning, and Decoding the Curse of Multilinguality [45.16490310398125]
  We undertake the largest multilingual scaling laws study to date, totaling 774 multilingual training experiments.<n>We introduce the Adaptive Transfer Scaling Law (ATLAS) for both monolingual and multilingual pretraining.<n>Our analyses shed light on multilingual learning dynamics, transfer properties between languages, and the curse of multilinguality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T21:45:22Z)
• Exploring Polyglot Harmony: On Multilingual Data Allocation for Large Language Models Pretraining [16.590296049892576]
  This paper introduces Climb, a novel framework designed to systematically optimize multilingual data allocation.<n>At its core, Climb introduces a cross-lingual interaction-aware language ratio, explicitly quantifying each language's effective allocation by capturing inter-language dependencies.<n>Extensive experiments confirm that Climb can accurately measure cross-lingual interactions across various multilingual settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-19T03:34:34Z)
• Investigating and Scaling up Code-Switching for Multilingual Language Model Pre-Training [58.696660064190475]
  We find that the existence of code-switching, alternating between different languages within a context, is key to multilingual capabilities.<n>To better explore the power of code-switching for language alignment during pre-training, we investigate the strategy of synthetic code-switching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T15:09:58Z)
• Enhancing Code Generation for Low-Resource Languages: No Silver Bullet [55.39571645315926]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) rely on large and diverse datasets to learn syntax, semantics, and usage patterns of programming languages.<n>For low-resource languages, the limited availability of such data hampers the models' ability to generalize effectively.<n>We present an empirical study investigating the effectiveness of several approaches for boosting LLMs' performance on low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T12:23:28Z)
• The Impact of Model Scaling on Seen and Unseen Language Performance [2.012425476229879]
  We study the performance and scaling behavior of multilingual Large Language Models across 204 languages.<n>Our findings show significant differences in scaling behavior between zero-shot and two-shot scenarios.<n>In two-shot settings, larger models show clear linear improvements in multilingual text classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-10T00:10:21Z)
• Bridging the Language Gaps in Large Language Models with Inference-Time Cross-Lingual Intervention [71.12193680015622]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in natural language processing. LLMs exhibit significant performance gaps among different languages. We propose Inference-Time Cross-Lingual Intervention (INCLINE) to overcome these limitations without incurring significant costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T11:23:03Z)
• Scaling Laws for Multilingual Language Models [41.6318470003173]
  A primary challenge in studying multilingual scaling is the difficulty of analyzing individual language performance due to cross-lingual transfer.<n>We introduce and validate a hypothesis that the test cross-entropy loss for each language family is determined solely by its own sampling ratio.<n>We derive a power-law relationship that links performance with dataset size, model size and sampling ratios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T20:29:38Z)
• Unraveling the Potential of Large Language Models in Code Translation: How Far Are We? [4.616570111453259]
  Large language models (LLMs) exhibit state-of-the-art performance in various tasks, but struggle for code translation. We conduct a large-scale empirical study to exploit the capabilities and incapabilities of LLMs in code translation tasks. We propose two methods: (1) intermediary translation which selects an intermediary language between the source and target ones; and (2) self-training which fine-tunes LLMs on self-generated parallel data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-13T12:20:12Z)
• Soft Language Clustering for Multilingual Model Pre-training [57.18058739931463]
  We propose XLM-P, which contextually retrieves prompts as flexible guidance for encoding instances conditionally. Our XLM-P enables (1) lightweight modeling of language-invariant and language-specific knowledge across languages, and (2) easy integration with other multilingual pre-training methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T08:08:08Z)
• From Good to Best: Two-Stage Training for Cross-lingual Machine Reading Comprehension [51.953428342923885]
  We develop a two-stage approach to enhance the model performance. The first stage targets at recall: we design a hard-learning (HL) algorithm to maximize the likelihood that the top-k predictions contain the accurate answer. The second stage focuses on precision: an answer-aware contrastive learning mechanism is developed to learn the fine difference between the accurate answer and other candidates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-09T07:31:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.