Professional Software Developers Don't Vibe, They Control: AI Agent Use for Coding in 2025

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.14012v1
• Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 02:15:06 GMT
• Title: Professional Software Developers Don't Vibe, They Control: AI Agent Use for Coding in 2025
• Abstract summary: This paper investigates how experienced developers use agents in building software.<n>We find that while developers value agents as a productivity boost, they retain their agency in software design and implementation.<n>Our results shed light on the value of software development best practices in effective use of agents.
• Score: 15.51798857332735
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The rise of AI agents is transforming how software can be built. The promise of agents is that developers might write code quicker, delegate multiple tasks to different agents, and even write a full piece of software purely out of natural language. In reality, what roles agents play in professional software development remains in question. This paper investigates how experienced developers use agents in building software, including their motivations, strategies, task suitability, and sentiments. Through field observations (N=13) and qualitative surveys (N=99), we find that while experienced developers value agents as a productivity boost, they retain their agency in software design and implementation out of insistence on fundamental software quality attributes, employing strategies for controlling agent behavior leveraging their expertise. In addition, experienced developers feel overall positive about incorporating agents into software development given their confidence in complementing the agents' limitations. Our results shed light on the value of software development best practices in effective use of agents, suggest the kinds of tasks for which agents may be suitable, and point towards future opportunities for better agentic interfaces and agentic use guidelines.

Related papers

• AgentForge: An Immersive Role-Playing Platform for Learning Agentic Software Engineering [4.609790123179083]
  We present textitAgentForge, an immersive learning system in which novices take on one of four software-engineering roles.<n>In each practice session, novices perform their chosen role while AI agents perform the remaining three.<n>In a study with 37 novice developers, participants achieved high task-completion rates with AI-agent support.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-04T18:58:18Z)
• How Do AI Coding Agents Contribute to Software Development? an Empirical Study of Agentic Pull Requests [5.6795075579540395]
  This study aims to characterize agentic pull requests (PR) in comparison to human generated PRs.<n>We first analyze how differences in merge rates between agentic and human generated PRs vary over time.<n>We then identify the types of development tasks where AI coding agents are predominantly applied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-23T21:48:28Z)
• The Meta-Agent Challenge: Are Current Agents Capable of Autonomous Agent Development? [80.24951682268332]
  We introduce the Meta-Agent Challenge (MAC), an evaluation framework designed to test the capacity of frontier models for autonomous agent development.<n>To ensure evaluation integrity, this framework is secured by multi-layer defenses against reward hacking.<n>We demonstrate that meta-agents rarely match human-engineered baseline policies, and the few that do are dominated by proprietary frontier models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T04:58:17Z)
• An Empirical Study of Agent Developer Practices in AI Agent Frameworks [59.862193600499914]
  The rise of large language models (LLMs) has sparked a surge of interest in agents, leading to the rapid growth of agent frameworks.<n>Despite widespread use of agent frameworks, their practical applications and how they influence the agent development process remain underexplored.<n>More than 80% of developers report difficulties in identifying the frameworks that best meet their specific development requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-01T17:52:15Z)
• Agent0: Unleashing Self-Evolving Agents from Zero Data via Tool-Integrated Reasoning [84.70211451226835]
  Large Language Model (LLM) Agents are constrained by a dependency on human-curated data.<n>We introduce Agent0, a fully autonomous framework that evolves high-performing agents without external data.<n>Agent0 substantially boosts reasoning capabilities, improving the Qwen3-8B-Base model by 18% on mathematical reasoning and 24% on general reasoning benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-20T05:01:57Z)
• Agentsway -- Software Development Methodology for AI Agents-based Teams [4.226647687395254]
  "Agentsway" is a novel software development framework designed for ecosystems where AI agents operate as first-class collaborators.<n>The framework defines distinct roles for planning, prompting, coding, testing, and fine-tuning agents.<n>Agentsway represents a foundational step toward the next generation of AI-native, self-improving software development methodologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-26T11:58:42Z)
• SEAgent: Self-Evolving Computer Use Agent with Autonomous Learning from Experience [71.82719117238307]
  We propose SEAgent, an agentic self-evolving framework enabling computer-use agents to evolve through interactions with unfamiliar software.<n>We validate the effectiveness of SEAgent across five novel software environments within OS-World.<n>Our approach achieves a significant improvement of 23.2% in success rate, from 11.3% to 34.5%, over a competitive open-source CUA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T17:58:46Z)
• ADEPTS: A Capability Framework for Human-Centered Agent Design [16.17708866196561]
  We introduce ADEPTS, a capability framework defining a set of core user-facing capabilities for AI agents.<n>We aim to condense complex AI-UX requirements into a compact framework that is actionable guidance for AI researchers, designers, engineers, and policy reviewers alike.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-18T22:27:40Z)
• Code with Me or for Me? How Increasing AI Automation Transforms Developer Workflows [60.04362496037186]
  We present the first controlled study of developer interactions with coding agents.<n>We evaluate two leading copilot and agentic coding assistants.<n>Our results show agents can assist developers in ways that surpass copilots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T20:12:54Z)
• Unified Software Engineering agent as AI Software Engineer [14.733475669942276]
  Large Language Model (LLM) technology has raised expectations for automated coding.<n>In this paper, we seek to understand this question by developing a Unified Software Engineering agent or USEagent.<n>We envision USEagent as the first draft of a future AI Software Engineer which can be a team member in future software development teams involving both AI and humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T16:19:13Z)
• Gödel Agent: A Self-Referential Agent Framework for Recursive Self-Improvement [112.04307762405669]
  G"odel Agent is a self-evolving framework inspired by the G"odel machine.<n>G"odel Agent can achieve continuous self-improvement, surpassing manually crafted agents in performance, efficiency, and generalizability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T10:49:40Z)
• Experiential Co-Learning of Software-Developing Agents [83.34027623428096]
  Large language models (LLMs) have brought significant changes to various domains, especially in software development. We introduce Experiential Co-Learning, a novel LLM-agent learning framework. Experiments demonstrate that the framework enables agents to tackle unseen software-developing tasks more effectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-28T13:50:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.