The Meta-Prompting Protocol: Orchestrating LLMs via Adversarial Feedback Loops

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.15053v1
• Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 03:32:21 GMT
• Title: The Meta-Prompting Protocol: Orchestrating LLMs via Adversarial Feedback Loops
• Authors: Fanzhe Fu,
• Abstract summary: Meta-Prompt Protocol formalizes the orchestration of Large Language Models as a programmable, self-optimizing system.<n>Treating natural language instructions as differentiable variables within a semantic graph and utilizing textual critiques as gradients, this architecture mitigates hallucination and prevents model collapse.
• Score: 0.6345523830122167
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The transition of Large Language Models (LLMs) from stochastic chat interfaces to reliable software components necessitates a fundamental re-engineering of interaction paradigms. Current methodologies, predominantly heuristic-based "prompt engineering," fail to provide the deterministic guarantees required for mission-critical applications. We introduce the Meta-Prompting Protocol, a rigorous theoretical framework that formalizes the orchestration of LLMs as a programmable, self-optimizing system. Central to this protocol is the Adversarial Trinity, a tripartite topology comprising a Generator (P), an Auditor (A), and an Optimizer (O). By treating natural language instructions as differentiable variables within a semantic computation graph and utilizing textual critiques as gradients, this architecture mitigates hallucination and prevents model collapse. We demonstrate the theoretical viability of this approach using declarative programming paradigms (DSPy) and automatic textual differentiation (TextGrad), establishing a foundation for "Observable Software Engineering" in the era of probabilistic computing.

Related papers

• Architecting AgentOS: From Token-Level Context to Emergent System-Level Intelligence [13.062618208633483]
  This paper proposes AgentOS, a holistic conceptual framework that redefines the Large Language Models as a "Reasoning Kernel" governed by structured operating system logic.<n>By mapping classical OS abstractions such as memory paging interrupt handling and process scheduling onto LLM native constructs, this review provides a rigorous roadmap for architecting resilient scalable and self-evolving cognitive environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-24T14:12:21Z)
• Interaction-Grounded Learning for Contextual Markov Decision Processes with Personalized Feedback [59.287761696290865]
  We propose a computationally efficient algorithm that achieves a sublinear regret guarantee for contextual episodic Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) with personalized feedback.<n>We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in learning personalized objectives from multi-turn interactions through experiments on both a synthetic episodic MDP and a real-world user booking dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T06:29:54Z)
• Policy-Conditioned Policies for Multi-Agent Task Solving [53.67744322553693]
  In this work, we propose a paradigm shift that bridges the gap by representing policies as human-interpretable source code.<n>We reformulate the learning problem by utilizing Large Language Models (LLMs) as approximate interpreters.<n>We formalize this process as textitProgrammatic Iterated Best Response (PIBR), an algorithm where the policy code is optimized by textual gradients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-24T07:42:10Z)
• Rethinking Testing for LLM Applications: Characteristics, Challenges, and a Lightweight Interaction Protocol [83.83217247686402]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have evolved from simple text generators into complex software systems that integrate retrieval augmentation, tool invocation, and multi-turn interactions.<n>Their inherent non-determinism, dynamism, and context dependence pose fundamental challenges for quality assurance.<n>This paper decomposes LLM applications into a three-layer architecture: textbftextitSystem Shell Layer, textbftextitPrompt Orchestration Layer, and textbftextitLLM Inference Core.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T13:00:28Z)
• SimStep: Chain-of-Abstractions for Incremental Specification and Debugging of AI-Generated Interactive Simulations [16.00479720281197]
  Chain-of-Abstractions (CoA) is a way to recover programming's core affordances.<n>CoA decomposes the synthesis process into a sequence of cognitively meaningful, task-aligned representations.<n>SimStep is an authoring environment for teachers that scaffolds simulation creation through four intermediate abstractions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-13T14:54:17Z)
• Robust Hypothesis Generation: LLM-Automated Language Bias for Inductive Logic Programming [3.641087660577424]
  We introduce a novel framework integrating a multi-agent system, powered by Large Language Models (LLMs), with Inductive Logic Programming (ILP)<n>Our system's LLM agents autonomously define a structured symbolic vocabulary (predicates) and relational templates.<n>Experiments in diverse, challenging scenarios validate superior performance, paving a new path for automated, explainable, and verifiable hypothesis generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T17:53:38Z)
• Proof of Thought : Neurosymbolic Program Synthesis allows Robust and Interpretable Reasoning [1.3003982724617653]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing, yet they struggle with inconsistent reasoning. This research introduces Proof of Thought, a framework that enhances the reliability and transparency of LLM outputs. Key contributions include a robust type system with sort management for enhanced logical integrity, explicit representation of rules for clear distinction between factual and inferential knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T18:35:45Z)
• Large Language Models are Interpretable Learners [53.56735770834617]
  In this paper, we show a combination of Large Language Models (LLMs) and symbolic programs can bridge the gap between expressiveness and interpretability. The pretrained LLM with natural language prompts provides a massive set of interpretable modules that can transform raw input into natural language concepts. As the knowledge learned by LSP is a combination of natural language descriptions and symbolic rules, it is easily transferable to humans (interpretable) and other LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T02:18:15Z)
• Entropy-Regularized Token-Level Policy Optimization for Language Agent Reinforcement [67.1393112206885]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise as intelligent agents in interactive decision-making tasks. We introduce Entropy-Regularized Token-level Policy Optimization (ETPO), an entropy-augmented RL method tailored for optimizing LLMs at the token level. We assess the effectiveness of ETPO within a simulated environment that models data science code generation as a series of multi-step interactive tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-09T07:45:26Z)
• Guiding the PLMs with Semantic Anchors as Intermediate Supervision: Towards Interpretable Semantic Parsing [57.11806632758607]
  We propose to incorporate the current pretrained language models with a hierarchical decoder network. By taking the first-principle structures as the semantic anchors, we propose two novel intermediate supervision tasks. We conduct intensive experiments on several semantic parsing benchmarks and demonstrate that our approach can consistently outperform the baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-04T07:27:29Z)
• How could Neural Networks understand Programs? [67.4217527949013]
  It is difficult to build a model to better understand programs, by either directly applying off-the-shelf NLP pre-training techniques to the source code, or adding features to the model by theshelf. We propose a novel program semantics learning paradigm, that the model should learn from information composed of (1) the representations which align well with the fundamental operations in operational semantics, and (2) the information of environment transition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T12:21:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.