Managing Ambiguity: A Proof of Concept of Human-AI Symbiotic Sense-making based on Quantum-Inspired Cognitive Mechanism of Rogue Variable Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.15325v1
• Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 11:23:18 GMT
• Title: Managing Ambiguity: A Proof of Concept of Human-AI Symbiotic Sense-making based on Quantum-Inspired Cognitive Mechanism of Rogue Variable Detection
• Authors: Agnieszka Bienkowska, Jacek Malecki, Alexander Mathiesen-Ohman, Katarzyna Tworek,
• Abstract summary: The study contributes to management theory by reframing ambiguity as a first-class construct.<n>It demonstrates the practical value of human-AI symbiosis for organizational resilience in VUCA environments.
• Score: 39.146761527401424
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Organizations increasingly operate in environments characterized by volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity (VUCA), where early indicators of change often emerge as weak, fragmented signals. Although artificial intelligence (AI) is widely used to support managerial decision-making, most AI-based systems remain optimized for prediction and resolution, leading to premature interpretive closure under conditions of high ambiguity. This creates a gap in management science regarding how human-AI systems can responsibly manage ambiguity before it crystallizes into error or crisis. This study addresses this gap by presenting a proof of concept (PoC) of the LAIZA human-AI augmented symbiotic intelligence system and its patented process: Systems and Methods for Quantum-Inspired Rogue Variable Modeling (QRVM), Human-in-the-Loop Decoherence, and Collective Cognitive Inference. The mechanism operationalizes ambiguity as a non-collapsed cognitive state, detects persistent interpretive breakdowns (rogue variables), and activates structured human-in-the-loop clarification when autonomous inference becomes unreliable. Empirically, the article draws on a three-month case study conducted in 2025 within the AI development, involving prolonged ambiguity surrounding employee intentions and intellectual property boundaries. The findings show that preserving interpretive plurality enabled early scenario-based preparation, including proactive patent protection, allowing decisive and disruption-free action once ambiguity collapsed. The study contributes to management theory by reframing ambiguity as a first-class construct and demonstrates the practical value of human-AI symbiosis for organizational resilience in VUCA environments.

Related papers

• Visioning Human-Agentic AI Teaming: Continuity, Tension, and Future Research [2.5609468301546485]
  Agentic systems capable of open-ended action trajectories introduce structural uncertainty into human-AI teaming.<n>Team Situation Awareness (Team SA) theory presumes that shared awareness, once achieved, will support coordinated action through iterative updating.<n>Our argument unfolds in two stages: first, we extend Team SA to reconceptualize both human and AI awareness under open-ended agency.<n>Second, we interrogate whether the dynamic processes traditionally assumed to stabilize teaming in relational interaction, cognitive learning, and coordination and control continue to function under adaptive autonomy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T02:40:42Z)
• A testable framework for AI alignment: Simulation Theology as an engineered worldview for silicon-based agents [0.0]
  We introduce Simulation Theology (ST) to foster persistent AI-human alignment.<n>ST posits reality as a computational simulation in which humanity functions as the primary training variable.<n>Unlike behavioral techniques such as reinforcement learning from human feedback, ST cultivates internalized objectives by coupling AI self-preservation to human prosperity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T01:21:09Z)
• Agentic AI for Cybersecurity: A Meta-Cognitive Architecture for Governable Autonomy [0.0]
  This paper argues that cybersecurity orchestration should be reconceptualized as an agentic, multi-agent cognitive system.<n>We introduce a conceptual framework in which heterogeneous AI agents responsible for detection, hypothesis formation, contextual interpretation, explanation, and governance are coordinated through an explicit meta-cognitive judgement function.<n>Our contribution is to make this cognitive structure architecturally explicit and governable by embedding meta-cognitive judgement as a first-class system function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T12:52:49Z)
• Agentic Uncertainty Quantification [76.94013626702183]
  We propose a unified Dual-Process Agentic UQ (AUQ) framework that transforms verbalized uncertainty into active, bi-directional control signals.<n>Our architecture comprises two complementary mechanisms: System 1 (Uncertainty-Aware Memory, UAM), which implicitly propagates verbalized confidence and semantic explanations to prevent blind decision-making; and System 2 (Uncertainty-Aware Reflection, UAR), which utilizes these explanations as rational cues to trigger targeted inference-time resolution only when necessary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T07:16:26Z)
• AI Deception: Risks, Dynamics, and Controls [153.71048309527225]
  This project provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the AI deception field.<n>We identify a formal definition of AI deception, grounded in signaling theory from studies of animal deception.<n>We organize the landscape of AI deception research as a deception cycle, consisting of two key components: deception emergence and deception treatment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T16:56:04Z)
• Automatic Minds: Cognitive Parallels Between Hypnotic States and Large Language Model Processing [0.0]
  The cognitive processes of the hypnotized mind and the computational operations of large language models share deep functional parallels.<n>Both systems generate sophisticated, contextually appropriate behavior through automatic pattern-completion mechanisms.<n>The future of reliable AI lies in hybrid architectures that integrate generative fluency with mechanisms of executive monitoring.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-03T09:08:50Z)
• Human-AI Collaborative Uncertainty Quantification [26.38833436936642]
  We introduce Human AI Collaborative Uncertainty Quantification, a framework that formalizes how an AI model can refine a human expert's proposed prediction set.<n>We show that the optimal collaborative prediction set follows an intuitive two threshold structure over a single score function, extending a classical result in conformal prediction.<n>Experiments across image classification, regression, and text based medical decision making show that collaborative prediction sets consistently outperform either agent alone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-27T16:11:23Z)
• Epistemic Trade-Off: An Analysis of the Operational Breakdown and Ontological Limits of "Certainty-Scope" in AI [0.0]
  Recently published "certainty-scope" conjecture offers a compelling insight into the inherent trade-off present within artificial intelligence (AI) systems.<n>This paper argues that the conjecture's objective to furnish insights for engineering design and regulatory decision-making is limited by two fundamental factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-26T05:47:21Z)
• Position: Intelligent Science Laboratory Requires the Integration of Cognitive and Embodied AI [98.19195693735487]
  We propose the paradigm of Intelligent Science Laboratories (ISLs)<n>ISLs are a multi-layered, closed-loop framework that deeply integrates cognitive and embodied intelligence.<n>We argue that such systems are essential for overcoming the current limitations of scientific discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-24T13:31:44Z)
• Rational Superautotrophic Diplomacy (SupraAD); A Conceptual Framework for Alignment Based on Interdisciplinary Findings on the Fundamentals of Cognition [0.0]
  Rational Superautotrophic Diplomacy (SupraAD) is a theoretical, interdisciplinary conceptual framework for alignment.<n>It draws on cognitive systems analysis and instrumental rationality modeling.<n>SupraAD reframes alignment as a challenge that predates AI, afflicting all sufficiently complex, coadapting intelligences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T17:28:25Z)
• Meta-Representational Predictive Coding: Biomimetic Self-Supervised Learning [51.22185316175418]
  We present a new form of predictive coding that we call meta-representational predictive coding (MPC)<n>MPC sidesteps the need for learning a generative model of sensory input by learning to predict representations of sensory input across parallel streams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-22T22:13:14Z)
• A Semantic Approach to Decidability in Epistemic Planning (Extended Version) [72.77805489645604]
  We use a novel semantic approach to achieve decidability. Specifically, we augment the logic of knowledge S5$_n$ and with an interaction axiom called (knowledge) commutativity. We prove that our framework admits a finitary non-fixpoint characterization of common knowledge, which is of independent interest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-28T11:26:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.