BRAID: Bounded Reasoning for Autonomous Inference and Decisions
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.15959v1
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 20:46:44 GMT
- Title: BRAID: Bounded Reasoning for Autonomous Inference and Decisions
- Abstract summary: This paper presents a study on structured prompting using BRAID (Bounded Reasoning for Au tonomous Inference and Decisions)<n>BRAID introduces a bounded reasoning framework using Mermaid-based instruction graphs.<n>We show that structured machine-readable prompts substantially increase reasoning accuracy and cost efficiency for agents in production systems.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit nonlinear relationships between performance, cost, and token usage. This paper presents a quantitative study on structured prompting using BRAID (Bounded Reasoning for Au tonomous Inference and Decisions) across multiple GPT model tiers, eval uated on the AdvancedIF, GSM-Hard, and the SCALE MultiChallenge benchmark datasets. BRAID introduces a bounded reasoning framework using Mermaid-based instruction graphs that enable models to reason struc turally rather than through unbounded natural-language token expansion. We show that structured machine-readable prompts substantially increase reasoning accuracy and cost efficiency for agents in production systems. The findings establish BRAID as an effective and scalable technique for optimizing inference efficiency in autonomous agent systems. All datasets and detailed result logs are available at https://benchmark.openserv.ai.
Related papers
- Where Larger Models Excel: The Primacy of Constraint-Guided Reasoning [15.328262855516689]
We develop an automated framework that identifies questions where the larger model shows a stable advantage.<n>Our analysis yields a systematic taxonomy of larger model reasoning advantages, spanning both common advantages that recur across domains and specialized advantages associated with particular domains.<n>Across these patterns, a recurring theme is Constraint-Guided Reasoning: larger models are better at identifying explicit and implicit constraints, organizing them into structured reasoning, and using them to rule out infeasible paths and verify intermediate steps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-09T09:54:59Z) - From Insight to Action: A Novel Framework for Interpretability-Guided Data Selection in Large Language Models [73.72877445629383]
Interpretability-Guided Data Selection (IGDS) is a framework that first identifies causal task features through frequency recall and interventional filtering.<n>We validate IGDS on mathematical reasoning, summarization, and translation tasks within Gemma-2, LLaMA-3.1, and Qwen3 models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-28T03:16:24Z) - Budget-Aware Anytime Reasoning with LLM-Synthesized Preference Data [57.996437077411315]
We study the reasoning behavior of large language models (LLMs) under limited computation budgets.<n>We introduce an anytime reasoning framework and the Anytime Index, a metric that quantifies how effectively solution quality improves as reasoning tokens increase.<n> Experiments on NaturalPlan (Trip), AIME, and GPQA datasets show consistent gains across Grok-3, GPT-oss, GPT-4.1/4o, and LLaMA models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-16T07:09:30Z) - Enhancing Business Analytics through Hybrid Summarization of Financial Reports [0.152292571922932]
Financial reports and earnings communications contain large volumes of structured and semi structured information.<n>We present a hybrid summarization framework that combines extractive and abstractive techniques to produce concise and factually reliable summaries.<n>These findings support the development of practical summarization systems for distilling lengthy financial texts into usable business insights.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-28T16:25:12Z) - Instruction-Tuning Open-Weight Language Models for BPMN Model Generation [0.0]
We investigate whether open-weight large language models, adapted via instruction tuning, can generate high-quality BPMN process models.<n>We introduce InstruBPM, a reproducible approach that prepares paired text-diagram data and instruction tunes an open source large language model.<n>We compare the tuned model with untuned open-weight baselines and strong proprietary models under consistent prompting regimes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-12T22:07:51Z) - One Model to Critique Them All: Rewarding Agentic Tool-Use via Efficient Reasoning [54.580646706013965]
Reward models (RMs) play a critical role in aligning large language models with human preferences.<n>We introduce ToolRM, a family of lightweight generative RMs tailored for general tool-use scenarios.<n>To build these models, we propose a novel pipeline that constructs pairwise preference data using rule-based scoring and multidimensional sampling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-30T06:08:27Z) - TableMind: An Autonomous Programmatic Agent for Tool-Augmented Table Reasoning [10.267950603662776]
TableMind is a tool-integrated table reasoning agent that autonomously performs multi-turn tool invocation, writes and executes code in a secure sandbox environment for data analysis and precise numerical reasoning.<n>To realize these capabilities, we adopt a two-stage fine-tuning paradigm built on top of a powerful pre-trained language model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-08T02:00:31Z) - SPaRFT: Self-Paced Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models [51.74498855100541]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong reasoning capabilities when fine-tuned with reinforcement learning (RL)<n>We propose textbfSPaRFT, a self-paced learning framework that enables efficient learning based on the capability of the model being trained.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-07T03:50:48Z) - Model Utility Law: Evaluating LLMs beyond Performance through Mechanism Interpretable Metric [99.56567010306807]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have become indispensable across academia, industry, and daily applications.<n>One core challenge of evaluation in the large language model (LLM) era is the generalization issue.<n>We propose Model Utilization Index (MUI), a mechanism interpretability enhanced metric that complements traditional performance scores.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-10T04:09:47Z) - ZEBRA: Leveraging Model-Behavioral Knowledge for Zero-Annotation Preference Dataset Construction [2.970904425631548]
ZEBRA is a model behavior-wise zero-annotation framework that constructs preference data by leveraging model behavior knowledge.<n>ZEBRA binarizes response pairs by evaluating the quality and similarity of their origin models, entirely bypassing instance-level annotation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-26T01:36:40Z) - Optimized Feature Generation for Tabular Data via LLMs with Decision Tree Reasoning [53.241569810013836]
We propose a novel framework that utilizes large language models (LLMs) to identify effective feature generation rules.
We use decision trees to convey this reasoning information, as they can be easily represented in natural language.
OCTree consistently enhances the performance of various prediction models across diverse benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-12T08:31:34Z) - CELA: Cost-Efficient Language Model Alignment for CTR Prediction [70.65910069412944]
Click-Through Rate (CTR) prediction holds a paramount position in recommender systems.<n>Recent efforts have sought to mitigate these challenges by integrating Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs)<n>We propose textbfCost-textbfEfficient textbfLanguage Model textbfAlignment (textbfCELA) for CTR prediction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-17T07:43:25Z) - A Fast and Robust BERT-based Dialogue State Tracker for Schema-Guided
Dialogue Dataset [8.990035371365408]
We introduce FastSGT, a fast and robust BERT-based model for state tracking in goal-oriented dialogue systems.
The proposed model is designed for theGuided Dialogue dataset which contains natural language descriptions.
Our model keeps the efficiency in terms of computational and memory consumption while improving the accuracy significantly.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-27T18:51:18Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.