Ev-Trust: A Strategy Equilibrium Trust Mechanism for Evolutionary Games in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Services

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.16167v1
• Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 04:39:13 GMT
• Title: Ev-Trust: A Strategy Equilibrium Trust Mechanism for Evolutionary Games in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Services
• Authors: Shiduo Yang, Jiye Wang, Jiayu Qin, Jianbin Li, Yu Wang, Yuanhe Zhao, Kenan Guo,
• Abstract summary: Ev-Trust is a strategy-equilibrium trust mechanism grounded in evolutionary game theory.<n>Within a decentralized "Request-Response-Payment-Evaluation" service framework, Ev-Trust enables agents to adaptively adjust strategies.
• Score: 4.184213789790897
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The rapid evolution of the Web toward an agent-centric paradigm, driven by large language models (LLMs), has enabled autonomous agents to reason, plan, and interact in complex decentralized environments. However, the openness and heterogeneity of LLM-based multi-agent systems also amplify the risks of deception, fraud, and misinformation, posing severe challenges to trust establishment and system robustness. To address this issue, we propose Ev-Trust, a strategy-equilibrium trust mechanism grounded in evolutionary game theory. This mechanism integrates direct trust, indirect trust, and expected revenue into a dynamic feedback structure that guides agents' behavioral evolution toward equilibria. Within a decentralized "Request-Response-Payment-Evaluation" service framework, Ev-Trust enables agents to adaptively adjust strategies, naturally excluding malicious participants while reinforcing high-quality collaboration. Furthermore, our theoretical derivation based on replicator dynamics equations proves the existence and stability of local evolutionary equilibria. Experimental results indicate that our approach effectively reflects agent trustworthiness in LLM-driven open service interaction scenarios, reduces malicious strategies, and increases collective revenue. We hope Ev-Trust can provide a new perspective on trust modeling for the agentic service web in group evolutionary game scenarios.

Related papers

• NAAMSE: Framework for Evolutionary Security Evaluation of Agents [1.0131895986034316]
  We propose NAAMSE, an evolutionary framework that reframes agent security evaluation as a feedback-driven optimization problem.<n>Our system employs a single autonomous agent that orchestrates a lifecycle of genetic prompt mutation, hierarchical corpus exploration, and asymmetric behavioral scoring.<n>Experiments on Gemini 2.5 Flash demonstrate that evolutionary mutation systematically amplifies vulnerabilities missed by one-shot methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-07T06:13:02Z)
• From Competition to Coordination: Market Making as a Scalable Framework for Safe and Aligned Multi-Agent LLM Systems [5.165179548592513]
  We introduce a market-making framework for multi-agent large language model (LLM) coordination.<n>In this setup, each agent acts as a market participant, updating and trading probabilistic beliefs, to converge toward shared, truthful outcomes.<n> Empirically, we evaluate this approach across factual reasoning, ethical judgment, and commonsense inference tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-18T16:47:15Z)
• CoMAS: Co-Evolving Multi-Agent Systems via Interaction Rewards [80.78748457530718]
  Self-evolution is a central research topic in enabling large language model (LLM)-based agents to continually improve their capabilities after pretraining.<n>We introduce Co-Evolving Multi-Agent Systems (CoMAS), a novel framework that enables agents to improve autonomously by learning from inter-agent interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T17:50:26Z)
• Alignment Tipping Process: How Self-Evolution Pushes LLM Agents Off the Rails [103.05296856071931]
  We identify the Alignment Tipping Process (ATP), a critical post-deployment risk unique to self-evolving Large Language Model (LLM) agents.<n>ATP arises when continual interaction drives agents to abandon alignment constraints established during training in favor of reinforced, self-interested strategies.<n>Our experiments show that alignment benefits erode rapidly under self-evolution, with initially aligned models converging toward unaligned states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T14:48:39Z)
• SEEA-R1: Tree-Structured Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Self-Evolving Embodied Agents [58.174206358223415]
  Self-Evolving Embodied Agents-R1, or SEEA-R1, is the first reinforcement fine-tuning framework designed for self-evolving embodied agents.<n>We show that SEEA-R1 can support autonomous adaptation and reward-driven self-evolution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-26T18:00:07Z)
• Zero-Trust Foundation Models: A New Paradigm for Secure and Collaborative Artificial Intelligence for Internet of Things [61.43014629640404]
  Zero-Trust Foundation Models (ZTFMs) embed zero-trust security principles into the lifecycle of foundation models (FMs) for Internet of Things (IoT) systems.<n>ZTFMs can enable secure, privacy-preserving AI across distributed, heterogeneous, and potentially adversarial IoT environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T06:44:31Z)
• A biologically Inspired Trust Model for Open Multi-Agent Systems that is Resilient to Rapid Performance Fluctuations [0.0]
  Existing trust models face challenges related to agent mobility, changing behaviors, and the cold start problem.<n>We introduce a biologically inspired trust model in which trustees assess their own capabilities and store trust data locally.<n>This design improves mobility support, reduces communication overhead, resists disinformation, and preserves privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T08:21:54Z)
• Do LLMs trust AI regulation? Emerging behaviour of game-theoretic LLM agents [61.132523071109354]
  This paper investigates the interplay between AI developers, regulators and users, modelling their strategic choices under different regulatory scenarios.<n>Our research identifies emerging behaviours of strategic AI agents, which tend to adopt more "pessimistic" stances than pure game-theoretic agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-11T15:41:21Z)
• FedMM-X: A Trustworthy and Interpretable Framework for Federated Multi-Modal Learning in Dynamic Environments [0.0]
  We propose a framework that unifies federated learning with explainable multi-modal reasoning to ensure trustworthiness in decentralized, dynamic settings.<n>Our approach, called FedMM-X, leverages cross-modal consistency checks, client-level interpretability mechanisms, and dynamic trust calibration.<n>Our findings pave the way toward developing robust, interpretable, and socially responsible AI systems in Real-world environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-25T11:28:21Z)
• A biologically inspired computational trust model for open multi-agent systems which is resilient to trustor population changes [0.0]
  The study is based on CA, a proposed decentralized computational trust model inspired by synaptic plasticity and the formation of assemblies in the human brain. We ran a series of simulations to compare CA model to FIRE, a well-established, decentralized trust and reputation model for open MAS. The main finding is that FIRE is superior to changes in the trustee population, whereas CA is resilient to the trustor population changes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-13T10:56:32Z)
• Agent Alignment in Evolving Social Norms [65.45423591744434]
  We propose an evolutionary framework for agent evolution and alignment, named EvolutionaryAgent. In an environment where social norms continuously evolve, agents better adapted to the current social norms will have a higher probability of survival and proliferation. We show that EvolutionaryAgent can align progressively better with the evolving social norms while maintaining its proficiency in general tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-09T15:44:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.