QuadSentinel: Sequent Safety for Machine-Checkable Control in Multi-agent Systems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.16279v1
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 07:58:40 GMT
- Title: QuadSentinel: Sequent Safety for Machine-Checkable Control in Multi-agent Systems
- Authors: Yiliu Yang, Yilei Jiang, Qunzhong Wang, Yingshui Tan, Xiaoyong Zhu, Sherman S. M. Chow, Bo Zheng, Xiangyu Yue,
- Abstract summary: textscQuadSentinel is a four-agent guard that compiles safety policies into machine-checkable rules.<n>textscQuadSentinel improves guardrail accuracy and rule recall while reducing false positives.
- Score: 22.833567409552074
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Safety risks arise as large language model-based agents solve complex tasks with tools, multi-step plans, and inter-agent messages. However, deployer-written policies in natural language are ambiguous and context dependent, so they map poorly to machine-checkable rules, and runtime enforcement is unreliable. Expressing safety policies as sequents, we propose \textsc{QuadSentinel}, a four-agent guard (state tracker, policy verifier, threat watcher, and referee) that compiles these policies into machine-checkable rules built from predicates over observable state and enforces them online. Referee logic plus an efficient top-$k$ predicate updater keeps costs low by prioritizing checks and resolving conflicts hierarchically. Measured on ST-WebAgentBench (ICML CUA~'25) and AgentHarm (ICLR~'25), \textsc{QuadSentinel} improves guardrail accuracy and rule recall while reducing false positives. Against single-agent baselines such as ShieldAgent (ICML~'25), it yields better overall safety control. Near-term deployments can adopt this pattern without modifying core agents by keeping policies separate and machine-checkable. Our code will be made publicly available at https://github.com/yyiliu/QuadSentinel.
Related papers
- Agentic AI for Autonomous Defense in Software Supply Chain Security: Beyond Provenance to Vulnerability Mitigation [0.0]
The current paper includes an example of agentic artificial intelligence (AI) based on autonomous software supply chain security.<n>It combines large language model (LLM)-based reasoning, reinforcement learning (RL), and multi-agent coordination.<n>Results show that agentic AI can facilitate the transition to self defending, proactive software supply chains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-29T14:06:09Z) - RoboSafe: Safeguarding Embodied Agents via Executable Safety Logic [56.38397499463889]
Embodied agents powered by vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly capable of executing complex real-world tasks.<n>However, they remain vulnerable to hazardous instructions that may trigger unsafe behaviors.<n>We propose RoboSafe, a runtime safeguard for embodied agents through executable predicate-based safety logic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-24T15:01:26Z) - Breaking and Fixing Defenses Against Control-Flow Hijacking in Multi-Agent Systems [7.558938027515112]
Control-flow hijacking attacks manipulate orchestration mechanisms in multi-agent systems into performing unsafe actions.<n>We propose, implement, and evaluate ControlValve, a new defense inspired by the principles of control-flow integrity and least privilege.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-20T08:02:51Z) - Adaptive Attacks on Trusted Monitors Subvert AI Control Protocols [80.68060125494645]
We study adaptive attacks by an untrusted model that knows the protocol and the monitor model.<n>We instantiate a simple adaptive attack vector by which the attacker embeds publicly known or zero-shot prompt injections in the model outputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-10T15:12:44Z) - Code Agent can be an End-to-end System Hacker: Benchmarking Real-world Threats of Computer-use Agent [64.08182031659047]
We propose AdvCUA, the first benchmark aligned with real-world TTPs in MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Matrix.<n>We evaluate the existing five mainstream CUAs, including ReAct, AutoGPT, Gemini CLI, and Cursor CLI.<n>Results demonstrate that current frontier CUAs do not adequately cover OS security-centric threats.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-08T03:35:23Z) - Policy-as-Prompt: Turning AI Governance Rules into Guardrails for AI Agents [0.19336815376402716]
We introduce a regulatory machine learning framework that converts unstructured design artifacts (like PRDs, TDDs, and code) into verifiable runtime guardrails.<n>Our Policy as Prompt method reads these documents and risk controls to build a source-linked policy tree.<n>System is built to enforce least privilege and data minimization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-28T17:36:52Z) - PSG-Agent: Personality-Aware Safety Guardrail for LLM-based Agents [60.23552141928126]
PSG-Agent is a personalized and dynamic system for LLM-based agents.<n>First, PSG-Agent creates personalized guardrails by mining the interaction history for stable traits.<n>Second, PSG-Agent implements continuous monitoring across the agent pipeline with specialized guards.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-28T03:31:59Z) - DRIFT: Dynamic Rule-Based Defense with Injection Isolation for Securing LLM Agents [52.92354372596197]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly central to agentic systems due to their strong reasoning and planning capabilities.<n>This interaction also introduces the risk of prompt injection attacks, where malicious inputs from external sources can mislead the agent's behavior.<n>We propose a Dynamic Rule-based Isolation Framework for Trustworthy agentic systems, which enforces both control and data-level constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-13T05:01:09Z) - LlamaFirewall: An open source guardrail system for building secure AI agents [0.5603362829699733]
Large language models (LLMs) have evolved from simple chatbots into autonomous agents capable of performing complex tasks.<n>Given the higher stakes and the absence of deterministic solutions to mitigate these risks, there is a critical need for a real-time guardrail monitor.<n>We introduce LlamaFirewall, an open-source security focused guardrail framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-06T14:34:21Z) - Progent: Programmable Privilege Control for LLM Agents [46.31581986508561]
We introduce Progent, the first privilege control framework to secure Large Language Models agents.<n>Progent enforces security at the tool level by restricting agents to performing tool calls necessary for user tasks while blocking potentially malicious ones.<n>Thanks to our modular design, integrating Progent does not alter agent internals and only requires minimal changes to the existing agent implementation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-16T01:58:40Z) - GuardAgent: Safeguard LLM Agents by a Guard Agent via Knowledge-Enabled Reasoning [79.07152553060601]
We propose GuardAgent, the first guardrail agent to protect target agents by dynamically checking whether their actions satisfy given safety guard requests.<n>Specifically, GuardAgent first analyzes the safety guard requests to generate a task plan, and then maps this plan into guardrail code for execution.<n>We show that GuardAgent effectively moderates the violation actions for different types of agents on two benchmarks with over 98% and 83% guardrail accuracies, respectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-13T14:49:26Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.