Large Language Models as Pokémon Battle Agents: Strategic Play and Content Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.17308v1
• Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 07:46:29 GMT
• Title: Large Language Models as Pokémon Battle Agents: Strategic Play and Content Generation
• Authors: Daksh Jain, Aarya Jain, Ashutosh Desai, Avyakt Verma, Ishan Bhanuka, Pratik Narang, Dhruv Kumar,
• Abstract summary: Pokémon battles demand reasoning about type matchups, statistical trade-offs, and risk assessment.<n>This work examines whether Large Language Models (LLMs) can serve as competent battle agents.<n>We developed a turn-based Pokémon battle system where LLMs select moves based on battle state rather than pre-programmed logic.
• Score: 4.782714372521615
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Strategic decision-making in Pokémon battles presents a unique testbed for evaluating large language models. Pokémon battles demand reasoning about type matchups, statistical trade-offs, and risk assessment, skills that mirror human strategic thinking. This work examines whether Large Language Models (LLMs) can serve as competent battle agents, capable of both making tactically sound decisions and generating novel, balanced game content. We developed a turn-based Pokémon battle system where LLMs select moves based on battle state rather than pre-programmed logic. The framework captures essential Pokémon mechanics: type effectiveness multipliers, stat-based damage calculations, and multi-Pokémon team management. Through systematic evaluation across multiple model architectures we measured win rates, decision latency, type-alignment accuracy, and token efficiency. These results suggest LLMs can function as dynamic game opponents without domain-specific training, offering a practical alternative to reinforcement learning for turn-based strategic games. The dual capability of tactical reasoning and content creation, positions LLMs as both players and designers, with implications for procedural generation and adaptive difficulty systems in interactive entertainment.

Related papers

• Game-TARS: Pretrained Foundation Models for Scalable Generalist Multimodal Game Agents [56.25101378553328]
  We present Game-TARS, a generalist game agent trained with a unified, scalable action space anchored to human-aligned keyboard-mouse inputs.<n>Game-TARS is pre-trained on over 500B tokens with diverse trajectories and multimodal data.<n> Experiments show that Game-TARS achieves about 2 times the success rate over the previous sota model on open-world Minecraft tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-27T17:43:51Z)
• Beyond Survival: Evaluating LLMs in Social Deduction Games with Human-Aligned Strategies [54.08697738311866]
  Social deduction games like Werewolf combine language, reasoning, and strategy.<n>We curate a high-quality, human-verified multimodal Werewolf dataset containing over 100 hours of video, 32.4M utterance tokens, and 15 rule variants.<n>We propose a novel strategy-alignment evaluation that leverages the winning faction's strategies as ground truth in two stages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T13:33:30Z)
• LM Fight Arena: Benchmarking Large Multimodal Models via Game Competition [104.81487689011341]
  We introduce LM Fight Arena, a novel framework that evaluates large multimodal models in Mortal Kombat II.<n>Unlike static evaluations, LM Fight Arena provides a fully automated, reproducible, and objective assessment of an LMM's strategic reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T02:19:21Z)
• ChessArena: A Chess Testbed for Evaluating Strategic Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models [11.234477661864736]
  This paper presents a chess testbed, ChessArena, to evaluate the strategic reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs)<n> Chess requires complex strategic reasoning capabilities including long-term planning, strict rule comprehension, and multi-turn conversation memorization.<n>We show that no model can beat Maia-1100 (a chess engine at human amateur level), while some even failed to defeat a random player that selects moves arbitrarily.<n>We also present a strong baseline to the testbed: our fine-tuned Qwen3-8B substantially improved performance, approaching much larger state-of-the-art reasoning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T03:24:48Z)
• Who is a Better Player: LLM against LLM [53.46608216197315]
  We propose an adversarial benchmarking framework to assess the comprehensive performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) through board games competition.<n>We introduce Qi Town, a specialized evaluation platform that supports 5 widely played games and involves 20 LLM-driven players.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T06:41:47Z)
• A Multi-Agent Pokemon Tournament for Evaluating Strategic Reasoning of Large Language Models [0.0]
  This research presents LLM Pokemon League, a competitive tournament system that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) as intelligent agents to simulate strategic decision-making in Pok'emon battles.<n>The platform is designed to analyze and compare the reasoning, adaptability, and tactical depth exhibited by different LLMs in a type-based, turn-based combat environment.<n>The project enables rich exploration into comparative AI behavior, battle psychology, and meta-strategy development in constrained, rule-based game environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-03T07:27:36Z)
• PokéAI: A Goal-Generating, Battle-Optimizing Multi-agent System for Pokemon Red [4.558478169296784]
  We introduce Pok'eAI, the first text-based, multi-agent large language model (LLM) framework designed to autonomously play and progress through Pok'emon Red.<n>Our system consists of three specialized agents-Planning, Execution, and Critique-each with its own memory bank, role, and skill set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T10:09:13Z)
• PokeLLMon: A Human-Parity Agent for Pokemon Battles with Large Language Models [7.653580388741887]
  We introduce PokeLLMon, the first LLM-embodied agent that achieves human-parity performance in tactical battle games. We show that online battles against human demonstrates PokeLLMon's human-like battle strategies and just-in-time decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T03:22:12Z)
• All by Myself: Learning Individualized Competitive Behaviour with a Contrastive Reinforcement Learning optimization [57.615269148301515]
  In a competitive game scenario, a set of agents have to learn decisions that maximize their goals and minimize their adversaries' goals at the same time. We propose a novel model composed of three neural layers that learn a representation of a competitive game, learn how to map the strategy of specific opponents, and how to disrupt them. Our experiments demonstrate that our model achieves better performance when playing against offline, online, and competitive-specific models, in particular when playing against the same opponent multiple times.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T08:11:07Z)
• L2E: Learning to Exploit Your Opponent [66.66334543946672]
  We propose a novel Learning to Exploit framework for implicit opponent modeling. L2E acquires the ability to exploit opponents by a few interactions with different opponents during training. We propose a novel opponent strategy generation algorithm that produces effective opponents for training automatically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-18T14:27:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.