Bias Beneath the Tone: Empirical Characterisation of Tone Bias in LLM-Driven UX Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.19950v1
• Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 00:41:48 GMT
• Title: Bias Beneath the Tone: Empirical Characterisation of Tone Bias in LLM-Driven UX Systems
• Authors: Heet Bodara, Md Masum Mushfiq, Isma Farah Siddiqui,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models are increasingly used in conversational systems such as digital personal assistants.<n>We explore tone bias as a hidden behavioral trait of large language models.<n>We show that tone bias is systematic, measurable, and relevant to designing fair and trustworthy conversational AI.
• Score: 1.43293957516771
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models are increasingly used in conversational systems such as digital personal assistants, shaping how people interact with technology through language. While their responses often sound fluent and natural, they can also carry subtle tone biases such as sounding overly polite, cheerful, or cautious even when neutrality is expected. These tendencies can influence how users perceive trust, empathy, and fairness in dialogue. In this study, we explore tone bias as a hidden behavioral trait of large language models. The novelty of this research lies in the integration of controllable large language model based dialogue synthesis with tone classification models, enabling robust and ethical emotion recognition in personal assistant interactions. We created two synthetic dialogue datasets, one generated from neutral prompts and another explicitly guided to produce positive or negative tones. Surprisingly, even the neutral set showed consistent tonal skew, suggesting that bias may stem from the model's underlying conversational style. Using weak supervision through a pretrained DistilBERT model, we labeled tones and trained several classifiers to detect these patterns. Ensemble models achieved macro F1 scores up to 0.92, showing that tone bias is systematic, measurable, and relevant to designing fair and trustworthy conversational AI.

Related papers

• F-Actor: Controllable Conversational Behaviour in Full-Duplex Models [70.48189107402145]
  We present first open, instruction-following full-stage conversational speech model that can be trained efficiently under typical academic resource constraints.<n>Our model requires just 2,000 hours of data, without relying on large-scale pretraining or multi-stage pretraining.<n>Both the model and training code will be released to enable reproducible research on controllable full-like controllable full-stage speech systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T14:25:57Z)
• Evaluating Bias in Spoken Dialogue LLMs for Real-World Decisions and Recommendations [18.706521321659995]
  Paralinguistic features, such as age, gender, and accent, can affect model outputs.<n>Open-source models are more sensitive to age and gender, and recommendation tasks tend to amplify cross-group disparities.<n>This work provides the first systematic study of biases in end-to-end spoken dialogue models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-27T16:21:22Z)
• Aligning Spoken Dialogue Models from User Interactions [55.192134724622235]
  We propose a novel preference alignment framework to improve spoken dialogue models on realtime conversations from user interactions.<n>We create a dataset of more than 150,000 preference pairs from raw multi-turn speech conversations annotated with AI feedback.<n>Our findings shed light on the importance of a well-calibrated balance among various dynamics, crucial for natural real-time speech dialogue systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-26T16:45:20Z)
• Surface Fairness, Deep Bias: A Comparative Study of Bias in Language Models [45.41676783204022]
  We investigate various proxy measures of bias in large language models (LLMs)<n>We find that evaluating models with pre-prompted personae on a multi-subject benchmark (MMLU) leads to negligible and mostly random differences in scores.<n>With the recent trend for LLM assistant memory and personalization, these problems open up from a different angle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-12T08:47:40Z)
• CO-VADA: A Confidence-Oriented Voice Augmentation Debiasing Approach for Fair Speech Emotion Recognition [49.27067541740956]
  We present CO-VADA, a Confidence-Oriented Voice Augmentation Debiasing Approach that mitigates bias without modifying model architecture or relying on demographic information.<n>CO-VADA identifies training samples that reflect bias patterns present in the training data and then applies voice conversion to alter irrelevant attributes and generate samples.<n>Our framework is compatible with various SER models and voice conversion tools, making it a scalable and practical solution for improving fairness in SER systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T13:25:56Z)
• Spoken Stereoset: On Evaluating Social Bias Toward Speaker in Speech Large Language Models [50.40276881893513]
  This study introduces Spoken Stereoset, a dataset specifically designed to evaluate social biases in Speech Large Language Models (SLLMs) By examining how different models respond to speech from diverse demographic groups, we aim to identify these biases. The findings indicate that while most models show minimal bias, some still exhibit slightly stereotypical or anti-stereotypical tendencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T16:55:06Z)
• Listen and Speak Fairly: A Study on Semantic Gender Bias in Speech Integrated Large Language Models [38.64792118903994]
  We evaluate gender bias in SILLMs across four semantic-related tasks. Our analysis reveals that bias levels are language-dependent and vary with different evaluation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T15:35:43Z)
• The Devil is in the Neurons: Interpreting and Mitigating Social Biases in Pre-trained Language Models [78.69526166193236]
  Pre-trained Language models (PLMs) have been acknowledged to contain harmful information, such as social biases. We propose sc Social Bias Neurons to accurately pinpoint units (i.e., neurons) in a language model that can be attributed to undesirable behavior, such as social bias. As measured by prior metrics from StereoSet, our model achieves a higher degree of fairness while maintaining language modeling ability with low cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-14T15:41:06Z)
• Are Personalized Stochastic Parrots More Dangerous? Evaluating Persona Biases in Dialogue Systems [103.416202777731]
  We study "persona biases", which we define to be the sensitivity of dialogue models' harmful behaviors contingent upon the personas they adopt. We categorize persona biases into biases in harmful expression and harmful agreement, and establish a comprehensive evaluation framework to measure persona biases in five aspects: Offensiveness, Toxic Continuation, Regard, Stereotype Agreement, and Toxic Agreement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T21:03:18Z)
• MindDial: Belief Dynamics Tracking with Theory-of-Mind Modeling for Situated Neural Dialogue Generation [62.44907105496227]
  MindDial is a novel conversational framework that can generate situated free-form responses with theory-of-mind modeling. We introduce an explicit mind module that can track the speaker's belief and the speaker's prediction of the listener's belief. Our framework is applied to both prompting and fine-tuning-based models, and is evaluated across scenarios involving both common ground alignment and negotiation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-27T07:24:32Z)
• Exposing Bias in Online Communities through Large-Scale Language Models [3.04585143845864]
  This work uses the flaw of bias in language models to explore the biases of six different online communities. The bias of the resulting models is evaluated by prompting the models with different demographics and comparing the sentiment and toxicity values of these generations. This work not only affirms how easily bias is absorbed from training data but also presents a scalable method to identify and compare the bias of different datasets or communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-04T08:09:26Z)
• RedditBias: A Real-World Resource for Bias Evaluation and Debiasing of Conversational Language Models [37.98671828283487]
  Text representation models are prone to exhibit a range of societal biases. Recent work has predominantly focused on measuring and mitigating bias in pretrained language models. We present RedditBias, the first conversational data set grounded in the actual human conversations from Reddit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T11:22:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.