Can LLMs Solve My Grandma's Riddle? Evaluating Multilingual Large Language Models on Reasoning Traditional Bangla Tricky Riddles
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.20324v1
- Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 12:48:05 GMT
- Title: Can LLMs Solve My Grandma's Riddle? Evaluating Multilingual Large Language Models on Reasoning Traditional Bangla Tricky Riddles
- Abstract summary: We introduce BanglaRiddleEval, a benchmark of 1,244 traditional Bangla riddles instantiated across four tasks.<n>Using an LLM-based pipeline, we generate Chain-of-Thought explanations, semantically coherent distractors, and fine-grained ambiguity annotations.<n>Results show that current LLMs capture some cues needed for Bangla riddle reasoning but remain far from human-level performance.
- Score: 5.194525790029377
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) show impressive performance on many NLP benchmarks, yet their ability to reason in figurative, culturally grounded, and low-resource settings remains underexplored. We address this gap for Bangla by introducing BanglaRiddleEval, a benchmark of 1,244 traditional Bangla riddles instantiated across four tasks (4,976 riddle-task artifacts in total). Using an LLM-based pipeline, we generate Chain-of-Thought explanations, semantically coherent distractors, and fine-grained ambiguity annotations, and evaluate a diverse suite of open-source and closed-source models under different prompting strategies. Models achieve moderate semantic overlap on generative QA but low correctness, MCQ accuracy peaks at only about 56% versus an 83% human baseline, and ambiguity resolution ranges from roughly 26% to 68%, with high-quality explanations confined to the strongest models. These results show that current LLMs capture some cues needed for Bangla riddle reasoning but remain far from human-level performance, establishing BanglaRiddleEval as a challenging new benchmark for low-resource figurative reasoning. All data, code, and evaluation scripts are available on GitHub: https://github.com/Labib1610/BanglaRiddleEval.
Related papers
- MameLoshnLM: Yiddish Language Model and Evaluation Benchmark [62.936233688546984]
We present MameLoshnLM, the first open-source 8B- parameter language model built specifically for Yiddish.<n>Despite Yiddish's rich textual tradition, its limited digital presence and the scarcity of reliable evaluation resources have constrained progress in Yiddish language modeling.<n>Our results provide both a foundation for Yiddish NLP and a practical template for language model development in historically rich but digitally underrepresented languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-06T10:24:08Z) - Omanic: Towards Step-wise Evaluation of Multi-hop Reasoning in Large Language Models [60.418191092851636]
Omanic is an open-domain multi-hop QA resource that provides decomposed sub-questions and intermediate answers as structural annotations for analyzing reasoning processes.<n>It contains 10,296 machine-generated training examples (Omanic Synth) and 967 expert-reviewed human-annotated evaluation examples (OmanicBench)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-17T15:23:37Z) - The Riddle of Reflection: Evaluating Reasoning and Self-Awareness in Multilingual LLMs using Indian Riddles [1.0732935873226022]
This paper examines the reasoning and self-assessment abilities of LLMs across seven major Indian languages.<n>We introduce a multilingual riddle dataset combining traditional riddles with context-reconstructed variants.<n>We evaluate five LLMs-Gemini 2.5 Pro, Gemini 2.5 Flash, Mistral-Saba, LLaMA 4 Scout, and LLaMA 4 Maverick-under seven prompting strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-02T14:40:36Z) - BanglaMATH : A Bangla benchmark dataset for testing LLM mathematical reasoning at grades 6, 7, and 8 [0.568041607842355]
We present BanglaMATH, a dataset of 1.7k Bangla math word problems across topics such as Arithmetic, Algebra, Geometry, and Logical Reasoning.<n>We find that Gemini 2.5 Flash and DeepSeek V3 are the only models to achieve strong performance, with $ge$ 80% accuracy across three elementary school grades.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-13T14:03:30Z) - LLM-Based Multi-Task Bangla Hate Speech Detection: Type, Severity, and Target [27.786707138241493]
We introduce the first multi-task Bangla hate-speech dataset, BanglaMultiHate, one of the largest manually annotated corpus to date.<n>We compare classical baselines, monolingual pretrained models, and LLMs under zero-shot prompting and LoRA fine-tuning.<n>Our experiments assess LLM adaptability in a low-resource setting and reveal a consistent trend. Although LoRA-tuned LLMs are competitive with BanglaBERT, culturally and linguistically grounded pretraining remains critical for robust performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-02T13:17:11Z) - LENS: Multi-level Evaluation of Multimodal Reasoning with Large Language Models [59.0256377330646]
Lens is a benchmark with 3.4K contemporary images and 60K+ human-authored questions covering eight tasks and 12 daily scenarios.<n>This dataset intrinsically supports to evaluate MLLMs to handle image-invariable prompts, from basic perception to compositional reasoning.<n>We evaluate 15+ frontier MLLMs such as Qwen2.5-VL-72B, InternVL3-78B, GPT-4o and two reasoning models QVQ-72B-preview and Kimi-VL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-21T15:06:59Z) - Performance Evaluation of Large Language Models in Bangla Consumer Health Query Summarization [1.2289361708127877]
This study investigates the zero-shot performance of nine advanced large language models (LLMs)<n>We benchmarked these LLMs using ROUGE metrics against Bangla T5, a fine-tuned state-of-the-art model.<n>The results demonstrate that zero-shot LLMs can rival fine-tuned models, achieving high-quality summaries even without task-specific training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-08T09:06:28Z) - SLAM: Towards Efficient Multilingual Reasoning via Selective Language Alignment [78.4550589538805]
We propose an efficient multilingual reasoning alignment approach that precisely identifies and fine-tunes the layers responsible for handling multilingualism.<n> Experimental results show that our method, SLAM, only tunes 6 layers' feed-forward sub-layers including 6.5-8% of all parameters within 7B and 13B LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-07T10:29:43Z) - Language Models are Hidden Reasoners: Unlocking Latent Reasoning Capabilities via Self-Rewarding [74.31981011985681]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities, but still struggle with complex reasoning tasks requiring multiple steps.
We introduce LaTent Reasoning Optimization (LaTRO), a principled framework that formulates reasoning as sampling from a latent distribution.
We validate LaTRO through experiments on GSM8K and ARC-Challenge datasets using multiple model architectures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-06T22:02:30Z) - Assessing Dialect Fairness and Robustness of Large Language Models in Reasoning Tasks [68.33068005789116]
We introduce ReDial, a benchmark containing 1.2K+ parallel query pairs in Standardized English and AAVE.<n>We evaluate widely used models, including GPT, Claude, Llama, Mistral, and the Phi model families.<n>Our work establishes a systematic and objective framework for analyzing LLM bias in dialectal queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-14T18:44:23Z) - Do Large Language Models Understand Conversational Implicature -- A case study with a chinese sitcom [4.142301960178498]
SwordsmanImp is the first Chinese multi-turn-dialogue-based dataset aimed at conversational implicature.
It includes 200 carefully handcrafted questions, all annotated on which Gricean maxims have been violated.
Our results show that GPT-4 attains human-level accuracy (94%) on multiple-choice questions.
Other models, including GPT-3.5 and several open-source models, demonstrate a lower accuracy ranging from 20% to 60% on multiple-choice questions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-30T12:43:53Z) - "Knowing When You Don't Know": A Multilingual Relevance Assessment Dataset for Robust Retrieval-Augmented Generation [90.09260023184932]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) grounds Large Language Model (LLM) output by leveraging external knowledge sources to reduce factual hallucinations.
NoMIRACL is a human-annotated dataset for evaluating LLM robustness in RAG across 18 typologically diverse languages.
We measure relevance assessment using: (i) hallucination rate, measuring model tendency to hallucinate, when the answer is not present in passages in the non-relevant subset, and (ii) error rate, measuring model inaccuracy to recognize relevant passages in the relevant subset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-18T17:18:04Z) - SEED-Bench-2: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models [67.28089415198338]
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have recently demonstrated exceptional capabilities in generating not only texts but also images given interleaved multimodal inputs.
SEED-Bench-2 comprises 24K multiple-choice questions with accurate human annotations, which spans 27 dimensions.
We evaluate the performance of 23 prominent open-source MLLMs and summarize valuable observations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-28T05:53:55Z) - Are Large Language Models Really Robust to Word-Level Perturbations? [68.60618778027694]
We propose a novel rational evaluation approach that leverages pre-trained reward models as diagnostic tools.
Longer conversations manifest the comprehensive grasp of language models in terms of their proficiency in understanding questions.
Our results demonstrate that LLMs frequently exhibit vulnerability to word-level perturbations that are commonplace in daily language usage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-20T09:23:46Z) - Massively Multilingual Shallow Fusion with Large Language Models [62.76735265311028]
We train a single multilingual language model (LM) for shallow fusion in multiple languages.
Compared to a dense LM of similar computation during inference, GLaM reduces the WER of an English long-tail test set by 4.4% relative.
In a multilingual shallow fusion task, GLaM improves 41 out of 50 languages with an average relative WER reduction of 3.85%, and a maximum reduction of 10%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-17T14:46:38Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.