What Makes a GitHub Issue Ready for Copilot?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.21426v1
• Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 21:16:02 GMT
• Title: What Makes a GitHub Issue Ready for Copilot?
• Authors: Mohammed Sayagh,
• Abstract summary: We build a set of 32 detailed criteria to measure the quality of GitHub issues to make them suitable for AI-agents.<n>We build an interpretable machine learning model to predict the likelihood of a GitHub issue resulting in a merged pull request.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: AI-agents help developers in different coding tasks, such as developing new features, fixing bugs, and reviewing code. Developers can write a Github issue and assign it to an AI-agent like Copilot for implementation. Based on the issue and its related discussion, the AI-agent performs a plan for the implementation, and executes it. However, the performance of AI-agents and LLMs heavily depends on the input they receive. For instance, a GitHub issue that is unclear or not well scoped might not lead to a successful implementation that will eventually be merged. GitHub Copilot provides a set of best practice recommendations that are limited and high-level. In this paper, we build a set of 32 detailed criteria that we leverage to measure the quality of GitHub issues to make them suitable for AI-agents. We compare the GitHub issues that lead to a merged pull request versus closed pull request. Then, we build an interpretable machine learning model to predict the likelihood of a GitHub issue resulting in a merged pull request. We observe that pull requests that end up being merged are those originating from issues that are shorter, well scoped, with clear guidance and hints about the relevant artifacts for an issue, and with guidance on how to perform the implementation. Issues with external references including configuration, context setup, dependencies or external APIs are associated with lower merge rates. We built an interpretable machine learning model to help users identify how to improve a GitHub issue to increase the chances of the issue resulting in a merged pull request by Copilot. Our model has a median AUC of 72\%. Our results shed light on quality metrics relevant for writing GitHub issues and motivate future studies further investigate the writing of GitHub issues as a first-class software engineering activity in the era of AI-teammates.

Related papers

• AgentPack: A Dataset of Code Changes, Co-Authored by Agents and Humans [46.56091965723774]
  Fine-tuning large language models for code editing has typically relied on mining commits and pull requests.<n>We present AgentPack, a corpus of 1.3M code edits co-authored by Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, and Cursor Agent.<n>We show that models fine-tuned on AgentPack can outperform models trained on prior human-only commit corpora.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T05:28:22Z)
• Classifying Issues in Open-source GitHub Repositories [0.0]
  GitHub is the most widely used platform for software maintenance in the open-source community.<n>Developers report issues on GitHub from time to time while facing difficulties.<n>Most of the GitHub repositories do not maintain regular labeling for the issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-25T06:20:54Z)
• Code with Me or for Me? How Increasing AI Automation Transforms Developer Workflows [60.04362496037186]
  We present the first controlled study of developer interactions with coding agents.<n>We evaluate two leading copilot and agentic coding assistants.<n>Our results show agents can assist developers in ways that surpass copilots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T20:12:54Z)
• SwingArena: Competitive Programming Arena for Long-context GitHub Issue Solving [90.32201622392137]
  We present SwingArena, a competitive evaluation framework for Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Unlike traditional static benchmarks, SwingArena models the collaborative process of software by pairing LLMs as iterations, who generate patches, and reviewers, who create test cases and verify the patches through continuous integration (CI) pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T18:28:02Z)
• RepoGraph: Enhancing AI Software Engineering with Repository-level Code Graph [63.87660059104077]
  We present RepoGraph, a plug-in module that manages a repository-level structure for modern AI software engineering solutions.<n>RepoGraph substantially boosts the performance of all systems, leading to a new state-of-the-art among open-source frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T05:45:26Z)
• Automatic Categorization of GitHub Actions with Transformers and Few-shot Learning [12.254055731378045]
  GitHub Actions (GHA) have been conceived to provide developers with a practical tool to create and maintain a pipeline. To expose actions to search engines, GitHub allows developers to assign them to one or more categories manually. We propose Gavel, a practical solution to increasing the visibility of actions in GitHub.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T02:27:36Z)
• AutoCodeRover: Autonomous Program Improvement [8.66280420062806]
  We propose an automated approach for solving GitHub issues to autonomously achieve program improvement. In our approach called AutoCodeRover, LLMs are combined with sophisticated code search capabilities, ultimately leading to a program modification or patch. Experiments on SWE-bench-lite (300 real-life GitHub issues) show increased efficacy in solving GitHub issues (19% on SWE-bench-lite), which is higher than the efficacy of the recently reported SWE-agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-08T11:55:09Z)
• MAGIS: LLM-Based Multi-Agent Framework for GitHub Issue Resolution [47.850418420195304]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in code generation but face difficulties in resolving GitHub issues. We propose a novel Multi-Agent framework for GitHub Issue reSolution, MAGIS, consisting of four agents customized for software evolution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T17:57:57Z)
• Enhancing Open-Domain Task-Solving Capability of LLMs via Autonomous Tool Integration from GitHub [79.31134731122462]
  We introduce OpenAct benchmark to evaluate the open-domain task-solving capability, built on human expert consultation and repositories in GitHub.<n>We present OpenAgent, a novel LLM-based agent system that can tackle evolving queries in open domains through autonomously integrating specialized tools from GitHub.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-28T15:47:30Z)
• Exploring the Problems, their Causes and Solutions of AI Pair Programming: A Study on GitHub and Stack Overflow [6.724815667295355]
  GitHub Copilot, the AI programmer pair, utilize machine learning models trained on a large corpus of code snippets to generate code suggestions. Despite its popularity in software development, there is limited empirical evidence on the actual experiences of practitioners who work with Copilot. We collected data from 473 GitHub issues, 706 GitHub discussions, and 142 Stack Overflow posts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-02T06:24:38Z)
• SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues? [80.52201658231895]
  SWE-bench is an evaluation framework consisting of $2,294$ software engineering problems drawn from real GitHub issues and corresponding pull requests across $12$ popular Python repositories. We show that both state-of-the-art proprietary models and our fine-tuned model SWE-Llama can resolve only the simplest issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T16:47:29Z)
• GitHub Actions: The Impact on the Pull Request Process [7.047566396769727]
  This study investigates how projects use GitHub Actions, what the developers discuss about them, and how project activity indicators change after their adoption. Our results indicate that 1,489 out of 5,000 most popular repositories (almost 30% of our sample) adopt GitHub Actions. Our findings also suggest that the adoption of GitHub Actions leads to more rejections of pull requests (PRs), more communication in accepted PRs and less communication in rejected PRs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-28T16:24:17Z)
• Predicting Issue Types on GitHub [8.791809365994682]
  Ticket Tagger is a GitHub app analyzing the issue title and description through machine learning techniques. We empirically evaluated the tool's prediction performance on about 30,000 GitHub issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-21T08:14:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.