HiSciBench: A Hierarchical Multi-disciplinary Benchmark for Scientific Intelligence from Reading to Discovery

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.22899v1
• Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2025 12:08:05 GMT
• Title: HiSciBench: A Hierarchical Multi-disciplinary Benchmark for Scientific Intelligence from Reading to Discovery
• Authors: Yaping Zhang, Qixuan Zhang, Xingquan Zhang, Zhiyuan Chen, Wenwen Zhuang, Yupu Liang, Lu Xiang, Yang Zhao, Jiajun Zhang, Yu Zhou, Chengqing Zong,
• Abstract summary: HiSciBench is a hierarchical benchmark designed to evaluate foundation models across five levels that mirror the complete scientific workflow.<n>HiSciBench contains 8,735 carefully curated instances spanning six major scientific disciplines.
• Score: 50.8841471967624
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) and multimodal foundation models has sparked growing interest in their potential for scientific research. However, scientific intelligence encompasses a broad spectrum of abilities ranging from understanding fundamental knowledge to conducting creative discovery, and existing benchmarks remain fragmented. Most focus on narrow tasks and fail to reflect the hierarchical and multi-disciplinary nature of real scientific inquiry. We introduce \textbf{HiSciBench}, a hierarchical benchmark designed to evaluate foundation models across five levels that mirror the complete scientific workflow: \textit{Scientific Literacy} (L1), \textit{Literature Parsing} (L2), \textit{Literature-based Question Answering} (L3), \textit{Literature Review Generation} (L4), and \textit{Scientific Discovery} (L5). HiSciBench contains 8,735 carefully curated instances spanning six major scientific disciplines, including mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, geography, and astronomy, and supports multimodal inputs including text, equations, figures, and tables, as well as cross-lingual evaluation. Unlike prior benchmarks that assess isolated abilities, HiSciBench provides an integrated, dependency-aware framework that enables detailed diagnosis of model capabilities across different stages of scientific reasoning. Comprehensive evaluations of leading models, including GPT-5, DeepSeek-R1, and several multimodal systems, reveal substantial performance gaps: while models achieve up to 69\% accuracy on basic literacy tasks, performance declines sharply to 25\% on discovery-level challenges. HiSciBench establishes a new standard for evaluating scientific Intelligence and offers actionable insights for developing models that are not only more capable but also more reliable. The benchmark will be publicly released to facilitate future research.

Related papers

• SciEvalKit: An Open-source Evaluation Toolkit for Scientific General Intelligence [99.30934038146965]
  SciEvalKit focuses on the core competencies of scientific intelligence.<n>It supports six major scientific domains, spanning from physics and chemistry to astronomy and materials science.<n>The toolkit is open-sourced and actively maintained to foster community-driven development and progress in AI4Science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-26T17:36:02Z)
• AInsteinBench: Benchmarking Coding Agents on Scientific Repositories [33.48206557020983]
  AInsteinBench is a large-scale benchmark for evaluating whether large language model (LLM) agents can operate as scientific computing development agents.<n>AInsteinBench measures a model's ability to move beyond surface-level code generation toward the core competencies required for computational scientific research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-24T08:11:11Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models in Scientific Discovery [91.732562776782]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to scientific research, yet prevailing science benchmarks probe decontextualized knowledge.<n>We introduce a scenario-grounded benchmark that evaluates LLMs across biology, chemistry, materials, and physics.<n>The framework assesses models at two levels: (i) question-level accuracy on scenario-tied items and (ii) project-level performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-17T16:20:03Z)
• ATLAS: A High-Difficulty, Multidisciplinary Benchmark for Frontier Scientific Reasoning [118.46980291324148]
  ATLAS is a large-scale, high-difficulty, and cross-disciplinary evaluation suite composed of approximately 800 original problems.<n>Its key features include: High Originality and Contamination Resistance, with all questions newly created or substantially adapted to prevent test data leakage.<n>Preliminary results on leading models demonstrate ATLAS's effectiveness in differentiating their advanced scientific reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-18T11:13:06Z)
• SciTrust 2.0: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Trustworthiness of Large Language Models in Scientific Applications [0.9650932290026195]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated transformative potential in scientific research, yet their deployment in high-stakes contexts raises significant trustworthiness concerns.<n>Here, we introduce SciTrust 2.0, a comprehensive framework for evaluating LLM trustworthiness in scientific applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-29T19:22:55Z)
• MME-SCI: A Comprehensive and Challenging Science Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models [27.425377320206444]
  multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved significant advancements across various domains.<n> benchmarks in the scientific domain have played an important role in assessing the reasoning capabilities of MLLMs.<n>Existing benchmarks still face three key challenges: 1) Insufficient evaluation of models' reasoning abilities in multilingual scenarios; 2) Inadequate assessment of MLLMs' comprehensive modality coverage; 3) Lack of fine-grained annotation of scientific knowledge points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-19T15:27:55Z)
• MDK12-Bench: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Multimodal Large Language Models on Multidisciplinary Exams [50.293164501645975]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) integrate language and visual cues for problem-solving.<n>Current benchmarks for measuring the intelligence of MLLMs suffer from limited scale, narrow coverage, and unstructured knowledge.<n>We introduce MDK12-Bench, a large-scale multidisciplinary benchmark built from real-world K-12 exams spanning six disciplines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-09T06:21:10Z)
• The Ever-Evolving Science Exam [69.20851050366643]
  We introduce the Ever-Evolving Science Exam (EESE), a dynamic benchmark designed to reliably assess scientific capabilities in foundation models.<n>Our approach consists of two components: 1) a non-public EESE-Pool with over 100K expertly constructed science instances (question-answer pairs) across 5 disciplines and 500+ subfields, built through a multi-stage pipeline ensuring Range, Reach, and Rigor, and 2) a periodically updated 500-instance subset EESE, sampled and validated to enable leakage-resilient, low-overhead evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-22T12:22:16Z)
• Advancing AI Research Assistants with Expert-Involved Learning [84.30323604785646]
  Large language models (LLMs) and large multimodal models (LMMs) promise to accelerate biomedical discovery, yet their reliability remains unclear.<n>We introduce ARIEL (AI Research Assistant for Expert-in-the-Loop Learning), an open-source evaluation and optimization framework.<n>We find that state-of-the-art models generate fluent but incomplete summaries, whereas LMMs struggle with detailed visual reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-03T14:21:48Z)
• LiveIdeaBench: Evaluating LLMs' Divergent Thinking for Scientific Idea Generation with Minimal Context [13.967898012303325]
  We introduce LiveIdeaBench, a benchmark evaluating Large Language Models' scientific idea generation.<n>Our benchmark employs a dynamic panel of state-of-the-art LLMs to assess generated ideas across five key dimensions: originality, feasibility, fluency, flexibility, and clarity.<n>Our results demonstrate that models like QwQ-32B-preview achieve creative performance comparable to top-tier models such as claude-3.7-sonnet:thinking, despite significant gaps in their general intelligence scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-23T14:13:44Z)
• Large Language Models for Scholarly Ontology Generation: An Extensive Analysis in the Engineering Field [0.0]
  This paper offers an analysis of the ability of large models to identify semantic relationships between different research topics.<n>We developed a gold standard based on the IEEE Thesaurus to evaluate the task.<n>Several models have achieved outstanding results, including Mixtral-8x7B, Dolphin-Mistral, and Claude 3-7B.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-11T10:11:41Z)
• MMSci: A Dataset for Graduate-Level Multi-Discipline Multimodal Scientific Understanding [59.41495657570397]
  We present a comprehensive dataset compiled from Nature Communications articles covering 72 scientific fields.<n>We evaluated 19 proprietary and open-source models on two benchmark tasks, figure captioning and multiple-choice, and conducted human expert annotation.<n>Fine-tuning Qwen2-VL-7B with our task-specific data achieved better performance than GPT-4o and even human experts in multiple-choice evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-06T00:40:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.