Fusion or Confusion? Multimodal Complexity Is Not All You Need

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.22991v1
• Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2025 16:20:36 GMT
• Title: Fusion or Confusion? Multimodal Complexity Is Not All You Need
• Authors: Tillmann Rheude, Roland Eils, Benjamin Wild,
• Abstract summary: We reimplement 19 high-impact methods under standardized conditions, evaluating them across nine diverse datasets with up to 23 modalities.<n>We propose a Simple Baseline for Multimodal Learning (SimBaMM), a straightforward late-fusion Transformer architecture.<n>We argue for a shift in focus: away from the pursuit of architectural novelty and toward methodological rigor.
• Score: 1.2472265402088736
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Deep learning architectures for multimodal learning have increased in complexity, driven by the assumption that multimodal-specific methods improve performance. We challenge this assumption through a large-scale empirical study reimplementing 19 high-impact methods under standardized conditions, evaluating them across nine diverse datasets with up to 23 modalities, and testing their generalizability to new tasks beyond their original scope, including settings with missing modalities. We propose a Simple Baseline for Multimodal Learning (SimBaMM), a straightforward late-fusion Transformer architecture, and demonstrate that under standardized experimental conditions with rigorous hyperparameter tuning of all methods, more complex architectures do not reliably outperform SimBaMM. Statistical analysis indicates that more complex methods perform comparably to SimBaMM and frequently do not reliably outperform well-tuned unimodal baselines, especially in the small-data regime considered in many original studies. To support our findings, we include a case study of a recent multimodal learning method highlighting the methodological shortcomings in the literature. In addition, we provide a pragmatic reliability checklist to promote comparable, robust, and trustworthy future evaluations. In summary, we argue for a shift in focus: away from the pursuit of architectural novelty and toward methodological rigor.

Related papers

• FutureMind: Equipping Small Language Models with Strategic Thinking-Pattern Priors via Adaptive Knowledge Distillation [13.855534865501369]
  Small Language Models (SLMs) are attractive for cost-sensitive and resource-limited settings due to their efficient, low-latency inference.<n>We propose FutureMind, a modular reasoning framework that equips SLMs with strategic thinking-pattern priors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T13:26:04Z)
• MULTIBENCH++: A Unified and Comprehensive Multimodal Fusion Benchmarking Across Specialized Domains [35.511656323075506]
  We have developed a large-scale, domain-adaptive benchmark for multimodal evaluation.<n>This benchmark integrates over 30 datasets, encompassing 15 modalities and 20 predictive tasks.<n>We have also developed an open-source, unified, and automated evaluation pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-09T16:37:09Z)
• Distributionally Robust Multimodal Machine Learning [1.8788768422083866]
  We propose a novel distributionally robust optimization (DRO) framework that aims to study both the theoretical and practical insights of multimodal machine learning.<n> Empirically, we demonstrate that our approach improves robustness in both simulation settings and real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-07T21:18:35Z)
• FindRec: Stein-Guided Entropic Flow for Multi-Modal Sequential Recommendation [57.577843653775]
  We propose textbfFindRec (textbfFlexible unified textbfinformation textbfdisentanglement for multi-modal sequential textbfRecommendation)<n>A Stein kernel-based Integrated Information Coordination Module (IICM) theoretically guarantees distribution consistency between multimodal features and ID streams.<n>A cross-modal expert routing mechanism that adaptively filters and combines multimodal features based on their contextual relevance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T04:09:45Z)
• Modality Curation: Building Universal Embeddings for Advanced Multimodal Information Retrieval [30.98084422803278]
  We introduce UNITE, a universal framework that tackles challenges through data curation and modality-aware training configurations.<n>Our work provides the first comprehensive analysis of how modality-specific data properties influence downstream task performance.<n>Our framework achieves state-of-the-art results on multiple multimodal retrieval benchmarks, outperforming existing methods by notable margins.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T08:09:44Z)
• Multi-Level Aware Preference Learning: Enhancing RLHF for Complex Multi-Instruction Tasks [81.44256822500257]
  RLHF has emerged as a predominant approach for aligning artificial intelligence systems with human preferences.<n> RLHF exhibits insufficient compliance capabilities when confronted with complex multi-instruction tasks.<n>We propose a novel Multi-level Aware Preference Learning (MAPL) framework, capable of enhancing multi-instruction capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T08:33:11Z)
• Continual Multimodal Contrastive Learning [99.53621521696051]
  Multimodal Contrastive Learning (MCL) advances in aligning different modalities and generating multimodal representations in a joint space.<n>However, a critical yet often overlooked challenge remains: multimodal data is rarely collected in a single process, and training from scratch is computationally expensive.<n>In this paper, we formulate CMCL through two specialized principles of stability and plasticity.<n>We theoretically derive a novel optimization-based method, which projects updated gradients from dual sides onto subspaces where any gradient is prevented from interfering with the previously learned knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T07:57:08Z)
• PAL: Prompting Analytic Learning with Missing Modality for Multi-Modal Class-Incremental Learning [42.00851701431368]
  Multi-modal class-incremental learning (MMCIL) seeks to leverage multi-modal data, such as audio-visual and image-text pairs.<n>A critical challenge remains: the issue of missing modalities during incremental learning phases.<n>We propose PAL, a novel exemplar-free framework tailored to MMCIL under missing-modality scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-16T08:04:04Z)
• Towards Modality Generalization: A Benchmark and Prospective Analysis [68.20973671493203]
  This paper introduces Modality Generalization (MG), which focuses on enabling models to generalize to unseen modalities.<n>We propose a comprehensive benchmark featuring multi-modal algorithms and adapt existing methods that focus on generalization.<n>Our work provides a foundation for advancing robust and adaptable multi-modal models, enabling them to handle unseen modalities in realistic scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-24T08:38:35Z)
• Progressive Multimodal Reasoning via Active Retrieval [64.74746997923967]
  Multi-step multimodal reasoning tasks pose significant challenges for large language models (MLLMs)<n>We propose AR-MCTS, a universal framework designed to progressively improve the reasoning capabilities of MLLMs.<n>We show that AR-MCTS can optimize sampling diversity and accuracy, yielding reliable multimodal reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T13:25:39Z)
• Beyond DAGs: A Latent Partial Causal Model for Multimodal Learning [80.44084021062105]
  We propose a novel latent partial causal model for multimodal data, featuring two latent coupled variables, connected by an undirected edge, to represent the transfer of knowledge across modalities.<n>Under specific statistical assumptions, we establish an identifiability result, demonstrating that representations learned by multimodal contrastive learning correspond to the latent coupled variables up to a trivial transformation.<n>Experiments on a pre-trained CLIP model embodies disentangled representations, enabling few-shot learning and improving domain generalization across diverse real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-09T07:18:06Z)
• High-Modality Multimodal Transformer: Quantifying Modality & Interaction Heterogeneity for High-Modality Representation Learning [112.51498431119616]
  This paper studies efficient representation learning for high-modality scenarios involving a large set of diverse modalities. A single model, HighMMT, scales up to 10 modalities (text, image, audio, video, sensors, proprioception, speech, time-series, sets, and tables) and 15 tasks from 5 research areas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-02T18:56:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.