From Model Choice to Model Belief: Establishing a New Measure for LLM-Based Research

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.23184v1
• Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 03:50:40 GMT
• Title: From Model Choice to Model Belief: Establishing a New Measure for LLM-Based Research
• Authors: Hongshen Sun, Juanjuan Zhang,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to simulate human behavior.<n>Treating an LLM's output as a single data point underutilizes the information inherent to the probabilistic nature of LLMs.<n>This paper introduces and formalizes "model belief," a measure derived from an LLM's token-level probabilities.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to simulate human behavior, but common practices to use LLM-generated data are inefficient. Treating an LLM's output ("model choice") as a single data point underutilizes the information inherent to the probabilistic nature of LLMs. This paper introduces and formalizes "model belief," a measure derived from an LLM's token-level probabilities that captures the model's belief distribution over choice alternatives in a single generation run. The authors prove that model belief is asymptotically equivalent to the mean of model choices (a non-trivial property) but forms a more statistically efficient estimator, with lower variance and a faster convergence rate. Analogous properties are shown to hold for smooth functions of model belief and model choice often used in downstream applications. The authors demonstrate the performance of model belief through a demand estimation study, where an LLM simulates consumer responses to different prices. In practical settings with limited numbers of runs, model belief explains and predicts ground-truth model choice better than model choice itself, and reduces the computation needed to reach sufficiently accurate estimates by roughly a factor of 20. The findings support using model belief as the default measure to extract more information from LLM-generated data.

Related papers

• Model Correlation Detection via Random Selection Probing [62.093777777813756]
  Existing similarity-based methods require access to model parameters or produce scores without thresholds.<n>We introduce Random Selection Probing (RSP), a hypothesis-testing framework that formulates model correlation detection as a statistical test.<n>RSP produces rigorous p-values that quantify evidence of correlation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T01:40:26Z)
• Model Utility Law: Evaluating LLMs beyond Performance through Mechanism Interpretable Metric [99.56567010306807]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have become indispensable across academia, industry, and daily applications.<n>One core challenge of evaluation in the large language model (LLM) era is the generalization issue.<n>We propose Model Utilization Index (MUI), a mechanism interpretability enhanced metric that complements traditional performance scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T04:09:47Z)
• Latent Thought Models with Variational Bayes Inference-Time Computation [52.63299874322121]
  Latent Thought Models (LTMs) incorporate explicit latent thought vectors that follow an explicit prior model in latent space.<n>LTMs demonstrate superior sample and parameter efficiency compared to autoregressive models and discrete diffusion models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T17:50:34Z)
• Ranked from Within: Ranking Large Multimodal Models Without Labels [73.96543593298426]
  We show that uncertainty scores derived from softmax distributions provide a robust basis for ranking models across various tasks.<n>This facilitates the ranking of LMMs on unlabeled data, providing a practical approach for selecting models for diverse target domains without requiring manual annotation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-09T13:05:43Z)
• Induced Model Matching: Restricted Models Help Train Full-Featured Models [1.4963011898406866]
  We consider scenarios where a very accurate (often small) predictive model using restricted features is available when training a full-featured (often larger) model.<n>How can the restricted model be useful to the full model?<n>We introduce a methodology called Induced Model Matching (IMM)<n>IMM aligns the context-restricted, or induced, version of the large model with the restricted model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T20:21:09Z)
• Learning from aggregated data with a maximum entropy model [73.63512438583375]
  We show how a new model, similar to a logistic regression, may be learned from aggregated data only by approximating the unobserved feature distribution with a maximum entropy hypothesis. We present empirical evidence on several public datasets that the model learned this way can achieve performances comparable to those of a logistic model trained with the full unaggregated data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-05T09:17:27Z)
• A Statistical-Modelling Approach to Feedforward Neural Network Model Selection [0.8287206589886881]
  Feedforward neural networks (FNNs) can be viewed as non-linear regression models. A novel model selection method is proposed using the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) for FNNs. The choice of BIC over out-of-sample performance leads to an increased probability of recovering the true model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-09T11:07:04Z)
• Finding Materialized Models for Model Reuse [20.97918143614477]
  Materialized model query aims to find the most appropriate materialized model as the initial model for model reuse. We present textsfMMQ, a source-data free, general, efficient, and effective materialized model query framework. Experiments on a range of practical model reuse workloads demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of textsfMMQ.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T06:55:44Z)
• Model-based metrics: Sample-efficient estimates of predictive model subpopulation performance [11.994417027132807]
  Machine learning models $-$ now commonly developed to screen, diagnose, or predict health conditions are evaluated with a variety of performance metrics. Subpopulation performance metrics are typically computed using only data from that subgroup, resulting in higher variance estimates for smaller groups. We propose using an evaluation model $-$ a model that describes the conditional distribution of the predictive model score $-$ to form model-based metric (MBM) estimates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-25T19:06:34Z)
• On Statistical Efficiency in Learning [37.08000833961712]
  We address the challenge of model selection to strike a balance between model fitting and model complexity. We propose an online algorithm that sequentially expands the model complexity to enhance selection stability and reduce cost. Experimental studies show that the proposed method has desirable predictive power and significantly less computational cost than some popular methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-24T16:08:29Z)
• Model-based Policy Optimization with Unsupervised Model Adaptation [37.09948645461043]
  We investigate how to bridge the gap between real and simulated data due to inaccurate model estimation for better policy optimization. We propose a novel model-based reinforcement learning framework AMPO, which introduces unsupervised model adaptation. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance in terms of sample efficiency on a range of continuous control benchmark tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T14:19:42Z)
• VAE-LIME: Deep Generative Model Based Approach for Local Data-Driven Model Interpretability Applied to the Ironmaking Industry [70.10343492784465]
  It is necessary to expose to the process engineer, not solely the model predictions, but also their interpretability. Model-agnostic local interpretability solutions based on LIME have recently emerged to improve the original method. We present in this paper a novel approach, VAE-LIME, for local interpretability of data-driven models forecasting the temperature of the hot metal produced by a blast furnace.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-15T07:07:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.