Adversarial Samples Are Not Created Equal

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.00577v1
• Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2026 05:30:42 GMT
• Title: Adversarial Samples Are Not Created Equal
• Authors: Jennifer Crawford, Amol Khanna, Fred Lu, Amy R. Wagoner, Stella Biderman, Andre T. Nguyen, Edward Raff,
• Abstract summary: We propose an ensemble-based metric to measure the manipulation of non-robust features by adversarial perturbations.<n>This new perspective also allows us to re-examine multiple phenomena, including the impact of sharpness-aware minimization on adversarial robustness.
• Score: 42.879013923494455
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Over the past decade, numerous theories have been proposed to explain the widespread vulnerability of deep neural networks to adversarial evasion attacks. Among these, the theory of non-robust features proposed by Ilyas et al. has been widely accepted, showing that brittle but predictive features of the data distribution can be directly exploited by attackers. However, this theory overlooks adversarial samples that do not directly utilize these features. In this work, we advocate that these two kinds of samples - those which use use brittle but predictive features and those that do not - comprise two types of adversarial weaknesses and should be differentiated when evaluating adversarial robustness. For this purpose, we propose an ensemble-based metric to measure the manipulation of non-robust features by adversarial perturbations and use this metric to analyze the makeup of adversarial samples generated by attackers. This new perspective also allows us to re-examine multiple phenomena, including the impact of sharpness-aware minimization on adversarial robustness and the robustness gap observed between adversarially training and standard training on robust datasets.

Related papers

• How Worst-Case Are Adversarial Attacks? Linking Adversarial and Perturbation Robustness [4.60092781176058]
  Adrial attacks are widely used to identify model vulnerabilities, but their validity as proxies for robustness to random perturbations remains debated.<n>We ask whether an adversarial example provides a representative estimate of misprediction risk under perturbations of the same magnitude.<n>We study the limits of this connection by proposing an attack strategy designed to probe vulnerabilities in regimes that are statistically closer to uniform noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T22:24:47Z)
• AFD: Mitigating Feature Gap for Adversarial Robustness by Feature Disentanglement [56.90364259986057]
  Adversarial fine-tuning methods enhance adversarial robustness via fine-tuning the pre-trained model in an adversarial training manner.<n>We propose a disentanglement-based approach to explicitly model and remove the specific latent features.<n>Our approach surpasses existing adversarial fine-tuning methods and adversarial training baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-26T08:38:57Z)
• Adversarial Attacks Against Uncertainty Quantification [10.655660123083607]
  This work focuses on a different adversarial scenario in which the attacker is still interested in manipulating the uncertainty estimate. In particular, the goal is to undermine the use of machine-learning models when their outputs are consumed by a downstream module or by a human operator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-19T12:54:09Z)
• On the Effect of Adversarial Training Against Invariance-based Adversarial Examples [0.23624125155742057]
  This work addresses the impact of adversarial training with invariance-based adversarial examples on a convolutional neural network (CNN) We show that when adversarial training with invariance-based and perturbation-based adversarial examples is applied, it should be conducted simultaneously and not consecutively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-16T12:35:37Z)
• Improving Adversarial Robustness to Sensitivity and Invariance Attacks with Deep Metric Learning [80.21709045433096]
  A standard method in adversarial robustness assumes a framework to defend against samples crafted by minimally perturbing a sample. We use metric learning to frame adversarial regularization as an optimal transport problem. Our preliminary results indicate that regularizing over invariant perturbations in our framework improves both invariant and sensitivity defense.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-04T13:54:02Z)
• Residual Error: a New Performance Measure for Adversarial Robustness [85.0371352689919]
  A major challenge that limits the wide-spread adoption of deep learning has been their fragility to adversarial attacks. This study presents the concept of residual error, a new performance measure for assessing the adversarial robustness of a deep neural network. Experimental results using the case of image classification demonstrate the effectiveness and efficacy of the proposed residual error metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-18T16:34:23Z)
• Towards Defending against Adversarial Examples via Attack-Invariant Features [147.85346057241605]
  Deep neural networks (DNNs) are vulnerable to adversarial noise. adversarial robustness can be improved by exploiting adversarial examples. Models trained on seen types of adversarial examples generally cannot generalize well to unseen types of adversarial examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T12:49:54Z)
• Closeness and Uncertainty Aware Adversarial Examples Detection in Adversarial Machine Learning [0.7734726150561088]
  We explore and assess the usage of 2 different groups of metrics in detecting adversarial samples. We introduce a new feature for adversarial detection, and we show that the performances of all these metrics heavily depend on the strength of the attack being used.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-11T14:44:59Z)
• Learning to Separate Clusters of Adversarial Representations for Robust Adversarial Detection [50.03939695025513]
  We propose a new probabilistic adversarial detector motivated by a recently introduced non-robust feature. In this paper, we consider the non-robust features as a common property of adversarial examples, and we deduce it is possible to find a cluster in representation space corresponding to the property. This idea leads us to probability estimate distribution of adversarial representations in a separate cluster, and leverage the distribution for a likelihood based adversarial detector.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-07T07:21:18Z)
• Fundamental Tradeoffs between Invariance and Sensitivity to Adversarial Perturbations [65.05561023880351]
  Adversarial examples are malicious inputs crafted to induce misclassification. This paper studies a complementary failure mode, invariance-based adversarial examples. We show that defenses against sensitivity-based attacks actively harm a model's accuracy on invariance-based attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-11T18:50:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.