Device-Native Autonomous Agents for Privacy-Preserving Negotiations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.00911v1
• Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2026 04:29:39 GMT
• Title: Device-Native Autonomous Agents for Privacy-Preserving Negotiations
• Abstract summary: This study introduces a device-native autonomous Artificial Intelligence (AI) agent system for privacy-preserving negotiations.<n>The proposed system operates exclusively on user hardware, enabling real-time bargaining while maintaining sensitive constraints locally.<n>Results show an average success rate of 87%, a 2.4x latency improvement over cloud baselines, and strong privacy preservation through zero-knowledge proofs.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Automated negotiations in insurance and business-to-business (B2B) commerce encounter substantial challenges. Current systems force a trade-off between convenience and privacy by routing sensitive financial data through centralized servers, increasing security risks, and diminishing user trust. This study introduces a device-native autonomous Artificial Intelligence (AI) agent system for privacy-preserving negotiations. The proposed system operates exclusively on user hardware, enabling real-time bargaining while maintaining sensitive constraints locally. It integrates zero-knowledge proofs to ensure privacy and employs distilled world models to support advanced on-device reasoning. The architecture incorporates six technical components within an agentic AI workflow. Agents autonomously plan negotiation strategies, conduct secure multi-party bargaining, and generate cryptographic audit trails without exposing user data to external servers. The system is evaluated in insurance and B2B procurement scenarios across diverse device configurations. Results show an average success rate of 87%, a 2.4x latency improvement over cloud baselines, and strong privacy preservation through zero-knowledge proofs. User studies show 27% higher trust scores when decision trails are available. These findings establish a foundation for trustworthy autonomous agents in privacy-sensitive financial domains.

Related papers

• Poisoning Agentic Alpha: Adversarial Vulnerabilities Across Roles and Architectures in Multi-Agent Trading Systems [103.90831279037094]
  LLM-based multi-agent trading systems are moving rapidly from research prototypes to live deployments that control real assets.<n>A corrupted signal can propagate to the final decision and translate into realized financial loss.<n>We present the first systematic empirical study in the financial domain to characterize how an adversarial signal enters a multi-agent trading system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-25T05:07:37Z)
• Towards trustworthy agentic AI: a comprehensive survey of safety, robustness, privacy, and system security [57.35851886874902]
  Agentic AI systems execute complex tasks autonomously, but their multi-step trajectories introduce new failure modes that challenge trustworthiness.<n>This survey provides a focused examination of trustworthy agentic AI through two core dimensions that are critical for high-risk deployments.<n>For each dimension, we clarify key concepts, identify where risks emerge along the agent workflow, and summarize stage-targeted mitigation strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-17T10:26:37Z)
• DecodingTrust-Agent Platform (DTap): A Controllable and Interactive Red-Teaming Platform for AI Agents [121.77550256034]
  DecodingTrust-Agent Platform (DTap) is a controllable and interactive red-teaming platform for AI agents.<n>DTap-Red is the first autonomous red-teaming agent that explores diverse injection vectors and autonomously discovers effective attack strategies.<n>Through DTap, we conduct large-scale evaluations of popular AI agents built on various backbone models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-06T11:59:48Z)
• CyberAId: AI-Driven Cybersecurity for Financial Service Providers [0.7279162155456086]
  We present CyberAId, a model-agnostic, on-premise-deployable platform in which a Main Agent coordination layer, a Reporting capability, and specialist subagents operate within a shared runtime under bounded human-in-the-loop autonomy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-03T14:15:11Z)
• SplitAgent: A Privacy-Preserving Distributed Architecture for Enterprise-Cloud Agent Collaboration [0.04061135251278187]
  Current agent frameworks assume complete data sharing, making them unsuitable for enterprise environments with confidential information.<n>We present SplitAgent, a novel distributed architecture that enables privacy-preserving collaboration between enterprise-side privacy agents and cloud-side reasoning agents.<n>Our key innovation is context-aware dynamic sanitization that adapts privacy protection based on task semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-09T10:51:31Z)
• Frontier AI Auditing: Toward Rigorous Third-Party Assessment of Safety and Security Practices at Leading AI Companies [57.521647436515785]
  We define frontier AI auditing as rigorous third-party verification of frontier AI developers' safety and security claims.<n>We introduce AI Assurance Levels (AAL-1 to AAL-4), ranging from time-bounded system audits to continuous, deception-resilient verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T18:44:09Z)
• Trusted AI Agents in the Cloud [4.2366483628004366]
  Omega is a system that enables trusted AI agents by enforcing end-to-end isolation.<n>It provides efficient multi-agent orchestration with cross-principal trust establishment.<n>It achieves high performance while enabling high-density, policy-compliant multi-agent deployments at cloud scale.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-05T18:48:53Z)
• Local Hybrid Retrieval-Augmented Document QA [0.0]
  Organizations handling sensitive documents face a critical dilemma: adopt cloud-based AI systems but compromise data privacy, or maintain local processing that ensures security but delivers poor accuracy.<n>We present a question-answering system that resolves this trade-off by combining semantic understanding with keyword precision, operating entirely on local infrastructure without internet access.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-13T13:34:32Z)
• Making LLMs Reliable When It Matters Most: A Five-Layer Architecture for High-Stakes Decisions [51.56484100374058]
  Current large language models (LLMs) excel in verifiable domains where outputs can be checked before action but prove less reliable for high-stakes strategic decisions with uncertain outcomes.<n>This gap, driven by mutually cognitive biases in both humans and artificial intelligence (AI) systems, threatens the defensibility of valuations and sustainability of investments in the sector.<n>This report describes a framework emerging from systematic qualitative assessment across 7 frontier-grade LLMs and 3 market-facing venture vignettes under time pressure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-10T22:24:21Z)
• What's the next frontier for Data-centric AI? Data Savvy Agents [71.76058707995398]
  We argue that data-savvy capabilities should be a top priority in the design of agentic systems.<n>We propose four key capabilities to realize this vision: Proactive data acquisition, Sophisticated data processing, Interactive test data synthesis, and Continual adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-02T17:09:29Z)
• OS-Sentinel: Towards Safety-Enhanced Mobile GUI Agents via Hybrid Validation in Realistic Workflows [77.95511352806261]
  Computer-using agents powered by Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated human-like capabilities in operating digital environments like mobile platforms.<n>We propose OS-Sentinel, a novel hybrid safety detection framework that combines a Formal Verifier for detecting explicit system-level violations with a Contextual Judge for assessing contextual risks and agent actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-28T13:22:39Z)
• Security Challenges in AI Agent Deployment: Insights from a Large Scale Public Competition [101.86739402748995]
  We run the largest public red-teaming competition to date, targeting 22 frontier AI agents across 44 realistic deployment scenarios.<n>We build the Agent Red Teaming benchmark and evaluate it across 19 state-of-the-art models.<n>Our findings highlight critical and persistent vulnerabilities in today's AI agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T05:13:04Z)
• From Cloud-Native to Trust-Native: A Protocol for Verifiable Multi-Agent Systems [7.002091295810318]
  We introduce TrustTrack, a protocol that embeds structural guarantees directly into agent infrastructure.<n>TrustTrack reframes how intelligent agents operate across organizations and jurisdictions.<n>We argue that the Cloud -> AI -> Agent -> Trust transition represents the next architectural layer for autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-25T04:38:38Z)
• Towards Secure and Private AI: A Framework for Decentralized Inference [14.526663289437584]
  Large multimodal foundational models present challenges in scalability, reliability, and potential misuse.<n>Decentralized systems offer a solution by distributing workload and mitigating central points of failure.<n>We address these challenges with a comprehensive framework designed for responsible AI development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-28T05:09:17Z)
• Confidential Federated Computations [16.415880530250092]
  Federated Learning and Analytics (FLA) have seen widespread adoption by technology platforms for processing sensitive on-device data.<n>FLA systems do not necessarily require anonymization mechanisms like differential privacy (DP)<n>This paper introduces a novel system architecture that leverages trusted execution environments (TEEs) and open-sourcing to ensure confidentiality of server-side computations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T17:47:27Z)
• Trustworthy AI [75.99046162669997]
  Brittleness to minor adversarial changes in the input data, ability to explain the decisions, address the bias in their training data, are some of the most prominent limitations. We propose the tutorial on Trustworthy AI to address six critical issues in enhancing user and public trust in AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-02T20:04:18Z)
• Trustworthy AI Inference Systems: An Industry Research View [58.000323504158054]
  We provide an industry research view for approaching the design, deployment, and operation of trustworthy AI inference systems. We highlight opportunities and challenges in AI systems using trusted execution environments. We outline areas of further development that require the global collective attention of industry, academia, and government researchers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-10T23:05:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.