The New Compiler Stack: A Survey on the Synergy of LLMs and Compilers
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.02045v1
- Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2026 12:02:57 GMT
- Title: The New Compiler Stack: A Survey on the Synergy of LLMs and Compilers
- Authors: Shuoming Zhang, Jiacheng Zhao, Qiuchu Yu, Chunwei Xia, Zheng Wang, Xiaobing Feng, Huimin Cui,
- Abstract summary: This survey has provided a systematic overview of the emerging field of LLM-enabled compilation.<n>We identified three primary benefits: the democratization of compiler development, the discovery of novel optimization strategies, and the broadening of the compiler's traditional scope.<n>In addressing the field's challenges and opportunities, we highlighted the critical hurdles of ensuring correctness and achieving scalability, while identifying the development of hybrid systems as the most promising path forward.
- Score: 6.842505574546511
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: This survey has provided a systematic overview of the emerging field of LLM-enabled compilation by addressing several key research questions. We first answered how LLMs are being integrated by proposing a comprehensive, multi-dimensional taxonomy that categorizes works based on their Design Philosophy (Selector, Translator, Generator), LLM Methodology, their operational Level of Code Abstraction, and the specific Task Type they address. In answering what advancements these approaches offer, we identified three primary benefits: the democratization of compiler development, the discovery of novel optimization strategies, and the broadening of the compiler's traditional scope. Finally, in addressing the field's challenges and opportunities, we highlighted the critical hurdles of ensuring correctness and achieving scalability, while identifying the development of hybrid systems as the most promising path forward. By providing these answers, this survey serves as a foundational roadmap for researchers and practitioners, charting the course for a new generation of LLM-powered, intelligent, adaptive and synergistic compilation tools.
Related papers
- Deep Research: A Systematic Survey [118.82795024422722]
Deep Research (DR) aims to combine the reasoning capabilities of large language models with external tools, such as search engines.<n>This survey presents a comprehensive and systematic overview of deep research systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-24T15:28:28Z) - A Comprehensive Survey on Benchmarks and Solutions in Software Engineering of LLM-Empowered Agentic System [56.40989626804489]
This survey provides the first holistic analysis of Large Language Models-powered software engineering.<n>We review over 150 recent papers and propose a taxonomy along two key dimensions: (1) Solutions, categorized into prompt-based, fine-tuning-based, and agent-based paradigms, and (2) Benchmarks, including tasks such as code generation, translation, and repair.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-10T06:56:50Z) - A Systematic Survey on Large Language Models for Evolutionary Optimization: From Modeling to Solving [26.501685261132124]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being explored for tackling optimization problems.<n>Despite rapid progress, the field still lacks a unified synthesis and a systematic taxonomy.<n>This survey addresses this gap by providing a comprehensive review of recent developments and organizing them within a structured framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-10T04:05:54Z) - A Survey on Code Generation with LLM-based Agents [61.474191493322415]
Code generation agents powered by large language models (LLMs) are revolutionizing the software development paradigm.<n>LLMs are characterized by three core features.<n>This paper presents a systematic survey of the field of LLM-based code generation agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-31T18:17:36Z) - Code LLMs: A Taxonomy-based Survey [7.3481279783709805]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across various NLP tasks.<n>LLMs have recently expanded their impact to coding tasks, bridging the gap between natural languages (NL) and programming languages (PL)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-11T11:07:50Z) - From Linguistic Giants to Sensory Maestros: A Survey on Cross-Modal Reasoning with Large Language Models [56.9134620424985]
Cross-modal reasoning (CMR) is increasingly recognized as a crucial capability in the progression toward more sophisticated artificial intelligence systems.
The recent trend of deploying Large Language Models (LLMs) to tackle CMR tasks has marked a new mainstream of approaches for enhancing their effectiveness.
This survey offers a nuanced exposition of current methodologies applied in CMR using LLMs, classifying these into a detailed three-tiered taxonomy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-19T02:51:54Z) - What's Wrong with Your Code Generated by Large Language Models? An Extensive Study [92.62952504133926]
This study evaluated the performance of three leading closed-source LLMs and six popular open-source LLMs on three commonly used benchmarks.<n>We developed a taxonomy of bugs for incorrect codes and analyzed the root cause for common bug types.<n>We propose a novel training-free iterative method that introduces self-critique, enabling LLMs to critique and correct their generated code.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-08T17:27:17Z) - LLM Inference Unveiled: Survey and Roofline Model Insights [62.92811060490876]
Large Language Model (LLM) inference is rapidly evolving, presenting a unique blend of opportunities and challenges.
Our survey stands out from traditional literature reviews by not only summarizing the current state of research but also by introducing a framework based on roofline model.
This framework identifies the bottlenecks when deploying LLMs on hardware devices and provides a clear understanding of practical problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-26T07:33:05Z) - Evolutionary Computation in the Era of Large Language Model: Survey and Roadmap [26.959633651475016]
The interplay between large language models (LLMs) and evolutionary algorithms (EAs) share a common pursuit of applicability in complex problems.
The abundant domain knowledge inherent in LLMs could enable EA to conduct more intelligent searches.
This paper provides a thorough review and a forward-looking roadmap, categorizing the reciprocal inspiration into two main avenues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-18T14:58:17Z) - The Tyranny of Possibilities in the Design of Task-Oriented LLM Systems:
A Scoping Survey [1.0489539392650928]
The paper begins by defining a minimal task-oriented LLM system and exploring the design space of such systems.
We discuss a pattern in our results and formulate them into three conjectures.
In all, the scoping survey presents seven conjectures that can help guide future research efforts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-29T13:35:20Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.