Parallel Latent Reasoning for Sequential Recommendation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.03153v1
• Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2026 16:25:48 GMT
• Title: Parallel Latent Reasoning for Sequential Recommendation
• Authors: Jiakai Tang, Xu Chen, Wen Chen, Jian Wu, Yuning Jiang, Bo Zheng,
• Abstract summary: We propose PLR, a novel framework for exploring multiple diverse reasoning trajectories simultaneously.<n>PLR constructs parallel reasoning streams through learnable trigger tokens in continuous latent space.<n>Experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate that PLR substantially outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.
• Score: 23.624137982116867
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Capturing complex user preferences from sparse behavioral sequences remains a fundamental challenge in sequential recommendation. Recent latent reasoning methods have shown promise by extending test-time computation through multi-step reasoning, yet they exclusively rely on depth-level scaling along a single trajectory, suffering from diminishing returns as reasoning depth increases. To address this limitation, we propose \textbf{Parallel Latent Reasoning (PLR)}, a novel framework that pioneers width-level computational scaling by exploring multiple diverse reasoning trajectories simultaneously. PLR constructs parallel reasoning streams through learnable trigger tokens in continuous latent space, preserves diversity across streams via global reasoning regularization, and adaptively synthesizes multi-stream outputs through mixture-of-reasoning-streams aggregation. Extensive experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate that PLR substantially outperforms state-of-the-art baselines while maintaining real-time inference efficiency. Theoretical analysis further validates the effectiveness of parallel reasoning in improving generalization capability. Our work opens new avenues for enhancing reasoning capacity in sequential recommendation beyond existing depth scaling.

Related papers

• LaSER: Internalizing Explicit Reasoning into Latent Space for Dense Retrieval [74.72139580745511]
  LaSER is a novel self-distillation framework that internalizes explicit reasoning into the latent space of retrievers.<n>Our method successfully combines the reasoning depth of explicit CoT pipelines with the inference efficiency of standard dense retrievers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-02T04:11:18Z)
• DiffuReason: Bridging Latent Reasoning and Generative Refinement for Sequential Recommendation [20.756497463882763]
  We propose DiffuReason, a unified "Think-then-Diffuse" framework for sequential recommendation.<n>It integrates multi-step Thinking Tokens for latent reasoning, diffusion-based refinement for denoising intermediate representations, and end-to-end Group Relative Policy Optimization.<n>Experiments on four benchmarks demonstrate that DiffuReason consistently improves diverse backbone architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T12:55:30Z)
• SpiralThinker: Latent Reasoning through an Iterative Process with Text-Latent Interleaving [4.732347368043908]
  SpiralThinker is a unified framework that performs iterative updates over latent representations.<n>A progressive alignment objective combined with structured annotations maintains coherence between latent and textual reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-12T05:05:42Z)
• A Survey on Parallel Reasoning [58.66122129692264]
  We first present a formal definition of parallel reasoning and clarify its distinction from related concepts like Chain-of-Thought.<n>We then organize and discuss advanced techniques based on a novel taxonomy, including non-interactive reasoning, interactive reasoning, and efficiency-focused decoding strategies.<n>We highlight the core challenges of parallel reasoning and suggest potential directions for future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T05:42:19Z)
• Beyond Surface Reasoning: Unveiling the True Long Chain-of-Thought Capacity of Diffusion Large Language Models [54.81955614221652]
  parallel decoding, which enables simultaneous token updates, conflicts with the causal order often required for rigorous reasoning.<n> Behavioral analyses in both simple and complex reasoning tasks show thatDLLMs exhibit genuine parallelism only for directly decidable outputs.<n>We propose several practical mitigations, parallel-oriented prompting, diffusion early stopping, and parallel scaling, to reduce PSC-induced ineffectiveness and inefficiencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T16:58:14Z)
• READER: Retrieval-Assisted Drafter for Efficient LLM Inference [0.0386965802948046]
  Autoregressive Language Models instantiate a factorized likelihood over token sequences, yet their strictly sequential decoding process imposes an intrinsic lower bound on latency inference.<n>This bottleneck has emerged as a central obstacle to the scalable deployment of large-scale generative models.<n>We present READER, a speculative decoding framework that bypasses the training of the auxiliary draft model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T16:47:48Z)
• ConciseHint: Boosting Efficient Reasoning via Continuous Concise Hints during Generation [74.37307916314407]
  We propose a framework dubbed ConciseHint, which continuously encourages the reasoning model to speak concisely.<n>Experiments on the state-of-the-art LRMs, including DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen-3 series, demonstrate that our method can effectively produce concise reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-23T16:20:44Z)
• Hybrid Latent Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning [50.6763762323985]
  We explore latent reasoning by leveraging the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) via reinforcement learning (RL)<n>We introduce hybrid reasoning policy optimization (HRPO), an RL-based hybrid latent reasoning approach that integrates prior hidden states into sampled tokens with a learnable gating mechanism.<n>HRPO-trained LLMs remain interpretable and exhibit intriguing behaviors like cross-lingual patterns and shorter completion lengths.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T01:26:16Z)
• Fractured Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [61.647243580650446]
  We introduce Fractured Sampling, a unified inference-time strategy that interpolates between full CoT and solution-only sampling.<n>We show that Fractured Sampling consistently achieves superior accuracy-cost trade-offs, yielding steep log-linear scaling gains in Pass@k versus token budget.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T11:30:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.