Verbatim Data Transcription Failures in LLM Code Generation: A State-Tracking Stress Test

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.03640v1
• Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2026 06:38:34 GMT
• Title: Verbatim Data Transcription Failures in LLM Code Generation: A State-Tracking Stress Test
• Authors: Mohd Ariful Haque, Kishor Datta Gupta, Mohammad Ashiqur Rahman, Roy George,
• Abstract summary: Many real-world software tasks require exact transcription of provided data into code.<n>Small omissions or alterations can remain silent while producing syntactically valid programs.<n>This paper introduces a deliberately minimal transcription-to-code benchmark to isolate this reliability concern.
• Score: 1.8875967655304022
• License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
• Abstract: Many real-world software tasks require exact transcription of provided data into code, such as cryptographic constants, protocol test vectors, allowlists, and calibration tables. These tasks are operationally sensitive because small omissions or alterations can remain silent while producing syntactically valid programs. This paper introduces a deliberately minimal transcription-to-code benchmark to isolate this reliability concern in LLM-based code generation. Given a list of high-precision decimal constants, a model must generate Python code that embeds the constants verbatim and performs a simple aggregate computation. We describe the prompting variants, evaluation protocol based on exact-string inclusion, and analysis framework used to characterize state-tracking and long-horizon generation failures. The benchmark is intended as a compact stress test that complements existing code-generation evaluations by focusing on data integrity rather than algorithmic reasoning.

Related papers

• Can LLMs Compress (and Decompress)? Evaluating Code Understanding and Execution via Invertibility [36.41073880422337]
  We present RoundTripCodeEval (RTCE), a comprehensive benchmark consisting of four distinct code execution reasoning tasks.<n>We systematically evaluate state-of-the-art Code-LLMs using zero-shot prompting, supervised fine-tuning on execution traces, and self-reflection mechanisms.<n>RTCE surfaces several new and previously unmeasured insights that are not captured by existing I/O-prediction, execution-reasoning, or round-trip natural-language benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T21:09:48Z)
• Accelerate Speculative Decoding with Sparse Computation in Verification [49.74839681322316]
  Speculative decoding accelerates autoregressive language model inference by verifying multiple draft tokens in parallel.<n>Existing sparsification methods are designed primarily for standard token-by-token autoregressive decoding.<n>We propose a sparse verification framework that jointly sparsifies attention, FFN, and MoE components during the verification stage to reduce the dominant computation cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-26T07:53:41Z)
• From Bits to Rounds: Parallel Decoding with Exploration for Diffusion Language Models [19.97248408121574]
  Diffusion Language Models (DLMs) offer comparable accuracy with faster inference speed via parallel decoding.<n>High-confidence tokens carry negligible information and strictly relying on them limits the effective progress made in each decoding round.<n>We propose Explore-Then-Exploit (ETE), a training-free decoding strategy that maximizes information throughput and decoding efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-26T06:38:37Z)
• Taming Imperfect Process Verifiers: A Sampling Perspective on Backtracking [54.43083499412643]
  Test-time algorithms that combine the generative power of language models with process verifiers offer a promising lever for eliciting new reasoning capabilities.<n>We introduce a new process-guided test-time sampling algorithm, VGB, which uses theoretically grounded backtracking to achieve provably better robustness to verifier errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-03T16:21:14Z)
• Probing Pre-trained Language Models on Code Changes: Insights from ReDef, a High-Confidence Just-in-Time Defect Prediction Dataset [0.0]
  We present ReDef, a high-confidence benchmark of function-level modifications curated from 22 large-scale C/C++ projects.<n>Defective cases are anchored by revert commits, while clean cases are validated through post-hoc history checks.<n>This pipeline yields 3,164 defective and 10,268 clean modifications, offering substantially more reliable labels than prior existing resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-11T07:07:11Z)
• CAAD: Context-Aware Adaptive Decoding for Truthful Text Generation [31.469511576774252]
  We propose a context-aware adaptive decoding method for large language models.<n>Our approach achieves a 2.8 percent average improvement on TruthfulQA.<n>Our model-agnostic, scalable, and efficient method requires only a single generation pass.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T08:28:25Z)
• IFEvalCode: Controlled Code Generation [69.28317223249358]
  The paper introduces forward and backward constraints generation to improve the instruction-following capabilities of Code LLMs.<n>The authors present IFEvalCode, a multilingual benchmark comprising 1.6K test samples across seven programming languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-30T08:08:48Z)
• Program Semantic Inequivalence Game with Large Language Models [20.43560028315856]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) can achieve strong performance on everyday coding tasks, but they can fail on complex tasks that require non-trivial reasoning about program semantics.<n>In this work, we explore a method to synthetically generate code reasoning training data based on a semantic inequivalence game SInQ.<n>We prove that this setup enables theoretically unlimited improvement through self-play in the limit of infinite computational resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-02T20:03:35Z)
• CodeIP: A Grammar-Guided Multi-Bit Watermark for Large Language Models of Code [56.019447113206006]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in code generation.<n>CodeIP is a novel multi-bit watermarking technique that inserts additional information to preserve provenance details.<n>Experiments conducted on a real-world dataset across five programming languages demonstrate the effectiveness of CodeIP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T04:25:04Z)
• Reducing Sequence Length by Predicting Edit Operations with Large Language Models [50.66922361766939]
  This paper proposes predicting edit spans for the source text for local sequence transduction tasks. We apply instruction tuning for Large Language Models on the supervision data of edit spans. Experiments show that the proposed method achieves comparable performance to the baseline in four tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T17:51:05Z)
• LEVER: Learning to Verify Language-to-Code Generation with Execution [64.36459105535]
  We propose LEVER, a simple approach to improve language-to-code generation by learning to verify the generated programs with their execution results. Specifically, we train verifiers to determine whether a program sampled from the LLMs is correct or not based on the natural language input, the program itself and its execution results. LEVER consistently improves over the base code LLMs(4.6% to 10.9% with code-davinci) and achieves new state-of-the-art results on all of them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-16T18:23:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.