MIND: From Passive Mimicry to Active Reasoning through Capability-Aware Multi-Perspective CoT Distillation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.03717v1
- Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2026 09:08:59 GMT
- Title: MIND: From Passive Mimicry to Active Reasoning through Capability-Aware Multi-Perspective CoT Distillation
- Authors: Jin Cui, Jiaqi Guo, Jiepeng Zhou, Ruixuan Yang, Jiayi Lu, Jiajun Xu, Jiangcheng Song, Boran Zhao, Pengju Ren,
- Abstract summary: Existing approaches restrict students to following a single golden rationale and treat different reasoning paths independently.<n>This misalignment leads to a degeneration of the student's latent reasoning distribution, causing suboptimal performance.<n>We propose MIND, a capability-filtered framework that transitions passive mimicry to active cognitive construction.
- Score: 16.96094045628127
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: While Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged with remarkable capabilities in complex tasks through Chain-of-Thought reasoning, practical resource constraints have sparked interest in transferring these abilities to smaller models. However, achieving both domain performance and cross-domain generalization remains challenging. Existing approaches typically restrict students to following a single golden rationale and treat different reasoning paths independently. Due to distinct inductive biases and intrinsic preferences, alongside the student's evolving capacity and reasoning preferences during training, a teacher's "optimal" rationale could act as out-of-distribution noise. This misalignment leads to a degeneration of the student's latent reasoning distribution, causing suboptimal performance. To bridge this gap, we propose MIND, a capability-adaptive framework that transitions distillation from passive mimicry to active cognitive construction. We synthesize diverse teacher perspectives through a novel "Teaching Assistant" network. By employing a Feedback-Driven Inertia Calibration mechanism, this network utilizes inertia-filtered training loss to align supervision with the student's current adaptability, effectively enhancing performance while mitigating catastrophic forgetting. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MIND achieves state-of-the-art performance on both in-distribution and out-of-distribution benchmarks, and our sophisticated latent space analysis further confirms the mechanism of reasoning ability internalization.
Related papers
- "The Whole Is Greater Than the Sum of Its Parts": A Compatibility-Aware Multi-Teacher CoT Distillation Framework [16.96094045628127]
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning empowers Large Language Models (LLMs) with remarkable capabilities but typically requires prohibitive parameter scales.<n>CoT distillation has emerged as a promising paradigm to transfer reasoning prowess into compact Student Models (SLMs)<n>We introduce COMPACT, a framework that adaptively fuses supervisions from different teachers by dynamically weighting teacher gradients.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-20T14:05:19Z) - From <Answer> to <Think>: Multidimensional Supervision of Reasoning Process for LLM Optimization [62.07990937720985]
Dimension-level Reward Model (DRM) is a new supervision framework for Large Language Models.<n>DRM evaluates the quality of a reasoning process along three fundamental, complementary, and interpretable dimensions.<n> Experimental results show that DRM provides effective supervision signals, guides the optimization of LLMs and enhances their reasoning ability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-13T14:29:15Z) - How LLMs Learn to Reason: A Complex Network Perspective [14.638878448692493]
Training large language models with Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards exhibits a set of puzzling behaviors.<n>We propose that these seemingly disparate phenomena can be explained using a single unifying theory.<n>Our work provides a new physical intuition for engineering the emergent reasoning capabilities of future AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-28T04:10:37Z) - Emergence of Superposition: Unveiling the Training Dynamics of Chain of Continuous Thought [64.43689151961054]
We theoretically analyze the training dynamics of a simplified two-layer transformer on the directed graph reachability problem.<n>Our analysis reveals that during training using continuous thought, the index-matching logit will first increase and then remain bounded under mild assumptions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-27T15:23:46Z) - Sycophancy Mitigation Through Reinforcement Learning with Uncertainty-Aware Adaptive Reasoning Trajectories [58.988535279557546]
We introduce textbf sycophancy Mitigation through Adaptive Reasoning Trajectories.<n>We show that SMART significantly reduces sycophantic behavior while preserving strong performance on out-of-distribution inputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-20T17:09:14Z) - Exploring and Exploiting the Inherent Efficiency within Large Reasoning Models for Self-Guided Efficiency Enhancement [101.77467538102924]
Large reasoning models (LRMs) exhibit overthinking, which hinders efficiency and inflates inference cost.<n>We propose two lightweight methods to enhance LRM efficiency.<n>First, we introduce Efficiency Steering, a training-free activation steering technique that modulates reasoning behavior via a single direction.<n>Second, we develop Self-Rewarded Efficiency RL, a reinforcement learning framework that dynamically balances task accuracy and brevity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-18T17:18:12Z) - Consistent Paths Lead to Truth: Self-Rewarding Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning [87.7836502955847]
We propose a novel self-rewarding reinforcement learning framework to enhance Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning.<n>Our key insight is that correct responses often exhibit consistent trajectory patterns in terms of model likelihood.<n>We introduce CoVo, an intrinsic reward mechanism that integrates Consistency and Volatility via a robust vector-space aggregation strategy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-10T12:40:39Z) - The Curse of CoT: On the Limitations of Chain-of-Thought in In-Context Learning [56.574829311863446]
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has been widely recognized for its ability to enhance reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs)<n>We demonstrate that CoT and its reasoning variants consistently underperform direct answering across varying model scales and benchmark complexities.<n>Our analysis uncovers a fundamental hybrid mechanism of explicit-implicit reasoning driving CoT's performance in pattern-based ICL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-07T13:51:06Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.