An Algorithmic Framework for Systematic Literature Reviews: A Case Study for Financial Narratives

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.03794v1
• Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2026 10:50:35 GMT
• Title: An Algorithmic Framework for Systematic Literature Reviews: A Case Study for Financial Narratives
• Authors: Gabin Taibi, Joerg Osterrieder,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces an algorithmic framework for conducting systematic literature reviews ( SLRs)<n>The proposed method integrates Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques, clustering algorithms, and interpretability tools to automate and structure the selection and analysis of academic publications.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper introduces an algorithmic framework for conducting systematic literature reviews (SLRs), designed to improve efficiency, reproducibility, and selection quality assessment in the literature review process. The proposed method integrates Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques, clustering algorithms, and interpretability tools to automate and structure the selection and analysis of academic publications. The framework is applied to a case study focused on financial narratives, an emerging area in financial economics that examines how structured accounts of economic events, formed by the convergence of individual interpretations, influence market dynamics and asset prices. Drawing from the Scopus database of peer-reviewed literature, the review highlights research efforts to model financial narratives using various NLP techniques. Results reveal that while advances have been made, the conceptualization of financial narratives remains fragmented, often reduced to sentiment analysis, topic modeling, or their combination, without a unified theoretical framework. The findings underscore the value of more rigorous and dynamic narrative modeling approaches and demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithmic SLR methodology.

Related papers

• Computational Measurement of Political Positions: A Review of Text-Based Ideal Point Estimation Algorithms [0.0]
  This article presents the first systematic review of unsupervised and semi-supervised computational text-based ideal point estimation (CT-IPE) algorithms.<n>CT-IPE algorithms are widely used in political science, communication, computational social science, and computer science to estimate ideological preferences from parliamentary speeches, party manifestos, and social media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-17T11:01:09Z)
• Context-Aware Hierarchical Taxonomy Generation for Scientific Papers via LLM-Guided Multi-Aspect Clustering [59.54662810933882]
  Existing taxonomy construction methods, leveraging unsupervised clustering or direct prompting of large language models, often lack coherence and granularity.<n>We propose a novel context-aware hierarchical taxonomy generation framework that integrates LLM-guided multi-aspect encoding with dynamic clustering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T15:12:58Z)
• Teaching LLMs to Think Mathematically: A Critical Study of Decision-Making via Optimization [1.246870021158888]
  This paper investigates the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in formulating and solving decision-making problems using mathematical programming.<n>We first conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of recent literature to assess how well LLMs understand, structure, and solve optimization problems across domains.<n>Our systematic evidence is complemented by targeted experiments designed to evaluate the performance of state-of-the-art LLMs in automatically generating optimization models for problems in computer networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-25T14:52:56Z)
• Option Pricing Using Ensemble Learning [0.0]
  Ensemble learning is characterized by flexibility, high precision, and refined structure.<n>This paper investigates the application of ensemble learning to option pricing, and conducts a comparative analysis with classical machine learning models.<n>A novel experimental strategy is introduced, leveraging parameter transfer across experiments to improve robustness and realism in financial simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T06:55:49Z)
• Semantic-based Unsupervised Framing Analysis (SUFA): A Novel Approach for Computational Framing Analysis [1.7878880883737438]
  This research presents a novel approach to computational framing analysis, called Semantic Relations-based Unsupervised Framing Analysis (SUFA)<n>SUFA leverages semantic relations and dependency parsing algorithms to identify and assess entity-centric emphasis frames in news media reports.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T14:19:22Z)
• Advanced Deep Learning Techniques for Analyzing Earnings Call Transcripts: Methodologies and Applications [0.0]
  The objective is to investigate how Natural Language Processing can be leveraged to extract sentiment from large-scale financial transcripts.<n>We examine the strengths and limitations of each model in the context of financial sentiment analysis.<n>Through rigorous experimentation, we evaluate their performance using key metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T00:28:43Z)
• Designing Algorithms Empowered by Language Models: An Analytical Framework, Case Studies, and Insights [86.06371692309972]
  This work presents an analytical framework for the design and analysis of large language models (LLMs)-based algorithms.<n>Our proposed framework serves as an attempt to mitigate such headaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-20T07:39:07Z)
• Are we making progress in unlearning? Findings from the first NeurIPS unlearning competition [70.60872754129832]
  First NeurIPS competition on unlearning sought to stimulate the development of novel algorithms. Nearly 1,200 teams from across the world participated. We analyze top solutions and delve into discussions on benchmarking unlearning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T12:58:00Z)
• Leveraging Large Language Models for NLG Evaluation: Advances and Challenges [57.88520765782177]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have opened new avenues for assessing generated content quality, e.g., coherence, creativity, and context relevance. We propose a coherent taxonomy for organizing existing LLM-based evaluation metrics, offering a structured framework to understand and compare these methods. By discussing unresolved challenges, including bias, robustness, domain-specificity, and unified evaluation, this paper seeks to offer insights to researchers and advocate for fairer and more advanced NLG evaluation techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T15:59:09Z)
• A Survey of Contextual Optimization Methods for Decision Making under Uncertainty [47.73071218563257]
  This review article identifies three main frameworks for learning policies from data and discusses their strengths and limitations. We present the existing models and methods under a uniform notation and terminology and classify them according to the three main frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-17T15:21:02Z)
• Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model Enhanced Approach [77.61131357420201]
  We conduct a thorough and rigorous study on fairness disparities in peer review with the help of large language models (LMs) We collect, assemble, and maintain a comprehensive relational database for the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) conference from 2017 to date. We postulate and study fairness disparities on multiple protective attributes of interest, including author gender, geography, author, and institutional prestige.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-07T16:19:42Z)
• Faithfulness in Natural Language Generation: A Systematic Survey of Analysis, Evaluation and Optimization Methods [48.47413103662829]
  Natural Language Generation (NLG) has made great progress in recent years due to the development of deep learning techniques such as pre-trained language models. However, the faithfulness problem that the generated text usually contains unfaithful or non-factual information has become the biggest challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-10T08:28:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.