ROI-Reasoning: Rational Optimization for Inference via Pre-Computation Meta-Cognition
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.03822v1
- Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2026 11:30:55 GMT
- Title: ROI-Reasoning: Rational Optimization for Inference via Pre-Computation Meta-Cognition
- Abstract summary: We study budgeted inference-time reasoning for multiple tasks under a strict global token constraint.<n>This perspective highlights a meta-cognitive requirement -- anticipating task difficulty, estimating return over investment.<n>We propose ROI-Reasoning, a two-stage framework that endows LLMs with intrinsic, budget-aware rationality.
- Score: 11.094392304740134
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) can achieve strong reasoning performance with sufficient computation, but they do not inherently know how much computation a task requires. We study budgeted inference-time reasoning for multiple tasks under a strict global token constraint and formalize it as a Ordered Stochastic Multiple-Choice Knapsack Problem(OS-MCKP). This perspective highlights a meta-cognitive requirement -- anticipating task difficulty, estimating return over investment (ROI), and allocating computation strategically. We propose ROI-Reasoning, a two-stage framework that endows LLMs with intrinsic, budget-aware rationality. In the first stage, Meta-Cognitive Fine-Tuning teaches models to predict reasoning cost and expected utility before generation, enabling explicit solve-or-skip decisions. Next, Rationality-Aware Reinforcement Learning optimizes sequential decision making under a hard token budget, allowing models to learn long-horizon allocation strategies. Across budgeted mathematical reasoning benchmarks, ROI-Reasoning consistently improves overall score while substantially reducing regret under tight computation budgets.
Related papers
- CARE: Competence-Aware Reward Shaping for Adaptive Reasoning Length in Video-MLLMs [50.189987475377656]
We propose CARE, a competence-aware reward shaping framework for adaptive reasoning length optimization in multimodal reasoning.<n> CARE maintains a smoothed competence estimate via an exponential moving average of pass rates, and uses it to route training into progressive stages.<n>Experiments on multiple video reasoning and general video understanding benchmarks demonstrate that CARE consistently improves reasoning accuracy, stabilizes reinforcement learning, and significantly enhances token efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-18T08:28:26Z) - Thinking Economically: A Hierarchical Framework for Adaptive-Complexity Reasoning in LLMs [36.73612668202756]
HAB learns step-specific token budgeting signals from PPL-derived step comparisons.<n>Experiments on GSM8K and MATH500 show that HAB not only surpasses standard CoT in accuracy but also reduces token usage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-31T11:20:00Z) - Nice Fold or Hero Call: Learning Budget-Efficient Thinking for Adaptive Reasoning [9.687158786222994]
Large reasoning models (LRMs) improve problem solving through extended reasoning, but often misallocate test-time compute.<n>We propose Budget-Efficient Thinking (BET), a two-stage framework that combines behavioral cold-start with GRPO under an investment-cost-aware reward.<n>BET reduces reasoning tokens by 55% on average while achieving overall performance improvements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-12T06:51:31Z) - Avoiding Overthinking and Underthinking: Curriculum-Aware Budget Scheduling for LLMs [1.7499351967216341]
Budget-Adaptive Curriculum Reasoning (BCAE) is a unified framework that jointly optimize reasoning quality and token efficiency.<n>BCAE includes a emphbudget-conditioned unified policy, a emphcurriculum-aware budget scheduler, and a emphtruncation-aware dense reward mechanism.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-29T18:31:09Z) - Budget-Aware Anytime Reasoning with LLM-Synthesized Preference Data [57.996437077411315]
We study the reasoning behavior of large language models (LLMs) under limited computation budgets.<n>We introduce an anytime reasoning framework and the Anytime Index, a metric that quantifies how effectively solution quality improves as reasoning tokens increase.<n> Experiments on NaturalPlan (Trip), AIME, and GPQA datasets show consistent gains across Grok-3, GPT-oss, GPT-4.1/4o, and LLaMA models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-16T07:09:30Z) - BARD: budget-aware reasoning distillation [25.725960386304646]
Long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) distillation effectively transfers reasoning capability to smaller language models.<n>We propose bftextBudget-Aware Reasoning Distillation (BARD), a novel framework that simultaneously distills reasoning capability and enables fine-grained control over the reasoning length.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-03T11:30:18Z) - BudgetThinker: Empowering Budget-aware LLM Reasoning with Control Tokens [33.607723102172194]
BudgetThinker is a framework designed to empower Large Language Models with budget-aware reasoning.<n>We show that BudgetThinker significantly surpasses strong baselines in maintaining performance across a variety of reasoning budgets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-24T03:17:50Z) - Steering LLM Thinking with Budget Guidance [48.65894557568655]
Budget guidance is a method for steering the reasoning process of LLMs toward a target budget without requiring any fine-tuning.<n>Our approach introduces a lightweight predictor that models a Gamma distribution over the remaining thinking length.<n>This signal is then used to guide generation in a soft, token-level manner, ensuring that the overall reasoning trace adheres to the specified thinking budget.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-16T17:57:05Z) - Optimizing Anytime Reasoning via Budget Relative Policy Optimization [70.32755424260336]
We present a novel framework, AnytimeReasoner, to optimize anytime reasoning performance.<n>We truncate the complete thinking process to fit within sampled token budgets from a prior distribution.<n>We then optimize the thinking and summary policies in a decoupled manner to maximize the cumulative reward.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-19T17:58:44Z) - Scalable Chain of Thoughts via Elastic Reasoning [61.75753924952059]
Elastic Reasoning is a novel framework for scalable chain of thoughts.<n>It separates reasoning into two phases--thinking and solution--with independently allocated budgets.<n>Our approach produces more concise and efficient reasoning even in unconstrained settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-08T15:01:06Z) - Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models [49.61246073215651]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex tasks.<n>Recent advancements in OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek-R1 have further improved performance in System-2 reasoning domains.<n>However, they also introduce significant computational overhead due to verbose and redundant outputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-20T17:59:38Z) - Rational Metareasoning for Large Language Models [17.479428400594028]
Being prompted to engage in reasoning has emerged as a core technique for using large language models (LLMs)<n>This work introduces a novel approach based on computational models of metareasoning used in cognitive science.<n>We develop a reward function that incorporates the Value of Computation by penalizing unnecessary reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-07T23:48:52Z) - MR-Ben: A Meta-Reasoning Benchmark for Evaluating System-2 Thinking in LLMs [55.20845457594977]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown increasing capability in problem-solving and decision-making.<n>We present a process-based benchmark MR-Ben that demands a meta-reasoning skill.<n>Our meta-reasoning paradigm is especially suited for system-2 slow thinking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T03:50:23Z) - Learning Planning-based Reasoning by Trajectories Collection and Process Reward Synthesizing [61.98556945939045]
We propose a framework to learn planning-based reasoning through Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) on collected trajectories.
Our results on challenging logical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our learning framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-01T15:18:33Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.