Correct and Weight: A Simple Yet Effective Loss for Implicit Feedback Recommendation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.04291v1
• Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2026 15:20:27 GMT
• Title: Correct and Weight: A Simple Yet Effective Loss for Implicit Feedback Recommendation
• Authors: Minglei Yin, Chuanbo Hu, Bin Liu, Neil Zhenqiang Gong, Yanfang, Ye, Xin Li,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces a novel and principled loss function, named Corrected and Weighted (CW) loss.<n>CW loss systematically corrects for the impact of false negatives within the training objective.<n> experiments conducted on four large-scale, sparse benchmark datasets demonstrate the superiority of our proposed loss.
• Score: 36.820719132176315
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Learning from implicit feedback has become the standard paradigm for modern recommender systems. However, this setting is fraught with the persistent challenge of false negatives, where unobserved user-item interactions are not necessarily indicative of negative preference. To address this issue, this paper introduces a novel and principled loss function, named Corrected and Weighted (CW) loss, that systematically corrects for the impact of false negatives within the training objective. Our approach integrates two key techniques. First, inspired by Positive-Unlabeled learning, we debias the negative sampling process by re-calibrating the assumed negative distribution. By theoretically approximating the true negative distribution (p-) using the observable general data distribution (p) and the positive interaction distribution (p^+), our method provides a more accurate estimate of the likelihood that a sampled unlabeled item is truly negative. Second, we introduce a dynamic re-weighting mechanism that modulates the importance of each negative instance based on the model's current prediction. This scheme encourages the model to enforce a larger ranking margin between positive items and confidently predicted (i.e., easy) negative items, while simultaneously down-weighting the penalty on uncertain negatives that have a higher probability of being false negatives. A key advantage of our approach is its elegance and efficiency; it requires no complex modifications to the data sampling process or significant computational overhead, making it readily applicable to a wide array of existing recommendation models. Extensive experiments conducted on four large-scale, sparse benchmark datasets demonstrate the superiority of our proposed loss. The results show that our method consistently and significantly outperforms a suite of state-of-the-art loss functions across multiple ranking-oriented metrics.

Related papers

• RRRA: Resampling and Reranking through a Retriever Adapter [0.0]
  We propose a learnable adapter module that monitors Bi-Encoder representations to estimate the likelihood that a hard negative is actually a false negative.<n>This probability is modeled dynamically and contextually, enabling fine-grained, query specific judgments.<n> Empirical results on standard benchmarks show that our adapter-enhanced framework consistently outperforms strong Bi-Encoder baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T08:59:57Z)
• Contrastive Learning with Negative Sampling Correction [52.990001829393506]
  We propose a novel contrastive learning method named Positive-Unlabeled Contrastive Learning (PUCL) PUCL treats the generated negative samples as unlabeled samples and uses information from positive samples to correct bias in contrastive loss. PUCL can be applied to general contrastive learning problems and outperforms state-of-the-art methods on various image and graph classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T11:18:18Z)
• Your Negative May not Be True Negative: Boosting Image-Text Matching with False Negative Elimination [62.18768931714238]
  We propose a novel False Negative Elimination (FNE) strategy to select negatives via sampling. The results demonstrate the superiority of our proposed false negative elimination strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-08T16:31:43Z)
• Generating Negative Samples for Sequential Recommendation [83.60655196391855]
  We propose to Generate Negative Samples (items) for Sequential Recommendation (SR) A negative item is sampled at each time step based on the current SR model's learned user preferences toward items. Experiments on four public datasets verify the importance of providing high-quality negative samples for SR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-07T05:44:13Z)
• Asymptotically Unbiased Estimation for Delayed Feedback Modeling via Label Correction [14.462884375151045]
  Delayed feedback is crucial for the conversion rate prediction in online advertising. Previous delayed feedback modeling methods balance the trade-off between waiting for accurate labels and consuming fresh feedback. We propose a new method, DElayed Feedback modeling with UnbiaSed Estimation, (DEFUSE), which aim to respectively correct the importance weights of the immediate positive, the fake negative, the real negative, and the delay positive samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-14T03:31:09Z)
• Mixture Proportion Estimation and PU Learning: A Modern Approach [47.34499672878859]
  Given only positive examples and unlabeled examples, we might hope to estimate an accurate positive-versus-negative classifier. classical methods for both problems break down in high-dimensional settings. We propose two simple techniques: Best Bin Estimation (BBE) and Value Ignoring Risk (CVIR)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-01T14:42:23Z)
• Rethinking InfoNCE: How Many Negative Samples Do You Need? [54.146208195806636]
  We study how many negative samples are optimal for InfoNCE in different scenarios via a semi-quantitative theoretical framework. We estimate the optimal negative sampling ratio using the $K$ value that maximizes the training effectiveness function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-27T08:38:29Z)
• Scalable Personalised Item Ranking through Parametric Density Estimation [53.44830012414444]
  Learning from implicit feedback is challenging because of the difficult nature of the one-class problem. Most conventional methods use a pairwise ranking approach and negative samplers to cope with the one-class problem. We propose a learning-to-rank approach, which achieves convergence speed comparable to the pointwise counterpart.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-11T03:38:16Z)
• Simplify and Robustify Negative Sampling for Implicit Collaborative Filtering [42.832851785261894]
  In this paper, we first provide a novel understanding of negative instances by empirically observing that only a few instances are potentially important for model learning. We then tackle the untouched false negative problem by favouring high-variance samples stored in memory. Empirical results on two synthetic datasets and three real-world datasets demonstrate both robustness and superiorities of our negative sampling method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-07T19:08:26Z)
• Understanding Negative Sampling in Graph Representation Learning [87.35038268508414]
  We show that negative sampling is as important as positive sampling in determining the optimization objective and the resulted variance. We propose Metropolis-Hastings (MCNS) to approximate the positive distribution with self-contrast approximation and accelerate negative sampling by Metropolis-Hastings. We evaluate our method on 5 datasets that cover extensive downstream graph learning tasks, including link prediction, node classification and personalized recommendation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-20T06:25:21Z)
• Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Data with Arbitrary Positive Shift [11.663072799764542]
  This paper shows that PU learning is possible even with arbitrarily non-representative positive data given unlabeled data. We integrate this into two statistically consistent methods to address arbitrary positive bias. Experimental results demonstrate our methods' effectiveness across numerous real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-24T13:53:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.