IGenBench: Benchmarking the Reliability of Text-to-Infographic Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.04498v1
• Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2026 02:06:53 GMT
• Title: IGenBench: Benchmarking the Reliability of Text-to-Infographic Generation
• Authors: Yinghao Tang, Xueding Liu, Boyuan Zhang, Tingfeng Lan, Yupeng Xie, Jiale Lao, Yiyao Wang, Haoxuan Li, Tingting Gao, Bo Pan, Luoxuan Weng, Xiuqi Huang, Minfeng Zhu, Yingchaojie Feng, Yuyu Luo, Wei Chen,
• Abstract summary: We present IGENBENCH, the first benchmark for evaluating the reliability of text-to-infographic generation.<n>We employ multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to verify each question, yielding question-level accuracy (Q-ACC) and infographic-level accuracy (I-ACC)<n>Our systematic analysis reveals key insights for future model development.
• Score: 23.503207781680103
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Infographics are composite visual artifacts that combine data visualizations with textual and illustrative elements to communicate information. While recent text-to-image (T2I) models can generate aesthetically appealing images, their reliability in generating infographics remains unclear. Generated infographics may appear correct at first glance but contain easily overlooked issues, such as distorted data encoding or incorrect textual content. We present IGENBENCH, the first benchmark for evaluating the reliability of text-to-infographic generation, comprising 600 curated test cases spanning 30 infographic types. We design an automated evaluation framework that decomposes reliability verification into atomic yes/no questions based on a taxonomy of 10 question types. We employ multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to verify each question, yielding question-level accuracy (Q-ACC) and infographic-level accuracy (I-ACC). We comprehensively evaluate 10 state-of-the-art T2I models on IGENBENCH. Our systematic analysis reveals key insights for future model development: (i) a three-tier performance hierarchy with the top model achieving Q-ACC of 0.90 but I-ACC of only 0.49; (ii) data-related dimensions emerging as universal bottlenecks (e.g., Data Completeness: 0.21); and (iii) the challenge of achieving end-to-end correctness across all models. We release IGENBENCH at https://igen-bench.vercel.app/.

Related papers

• VeriSciQA: An Auto-Verified Dataset for Scientific Visual Question Answering [53.662676566188175]
  A key bottleneck lies in the lack of public, large-scale, high-quality Scientific Visual Question Answering (SVQA) datasets.<n>We propose a verification-centric Generate-then-Verify framework that first generates QA pairs with figure-associated textual context.<n>We instantiate this framework to curate VeriSciQA, a dataset of 20,351 QA pairs spanning 20 scientific domains and 12 figure types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-25T04:14:52Z)
• InfoAffect: A Dataset for Affective Analysis of Infographics [21.63643063062395]
  We introduce a 3.5k-sample affect-annotated InfoAffect dataset, which combines textual content with real-world infographics.<n>Five state-of-the-art multimodal large language models (MLLMs) then analyze both modalities, and their outputs are fused with Reciprocal Rank Fusion (RRF) algorithm to yield robust affects and confidences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-09T14:35:59Z)
• Text2Vis: A Challenging and Diverse Benchmark for Generating Multimodal Visualizations from Text [30.74255946385862]
  We introduce Text2Vis, a benchmark designed to assess text-to-visualization models.<n>It comprises 1,985 samples, each with a data table, natural language query, short answer, visualization code, and annotated charts.<n>It reveals significant performance gaps, highlighting key challenges, and offering insights for future advancements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-26T14:59:04Z)
• RefChartQA: Grounding Visual Answer on Chart Images through Instruction Tuning [63.599057862999]
  RefChartQA is a novel benchmark that integrates Chart Question Answering (ChartQA) with visual grounding.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that incorporating spatial awareness via grounding improves response accuracy by over 15%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-29T15:50:08Z)
• EvalMuse-40K: A Reliable and Fine-Grained Benchmark with Comprehensive Human Annotations for Text-to-Image Generation Model Evaluation [29.176750442205325]
  In this study, we contribute an EvalMuse-40K benchmark, gathering 40K image-text pairs with fine-grained human annotations for image-text alignment-related tasks.<n>We introduce two new methods to evaluate the image-text alignment capabilities of T2I models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-24T04:08:25Z)
• Evaluating Image Hallucination in Text-to-Image Generation with Question-Answering [13.490305443938817]
  We introduce I-HallA (Image Hallucination evaluation with Question Answering), a novel evaluation metric.<n>I-HallA measures the factuality of generated images through visual question answering (VQA)<n>We evaluate five TTI models using I-HallA and reveal that these state-of-the-art models often fail to accurately convey factual information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-19T13:51:21Z)
• On Pre-training of Multimodal Language Models Customized for Chart Understanding [83.99377088129282]
  This paper explores the training processes necessary to improve MLLMs' comprehension of charts.<n>We introduce CHOPINLLM, an MLLM tailored for in-depth chart comprehension.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T17:58:36Z)
• CharXiv: Charting Gaps in Realistic Chart Understanding in Multimodal LLMs [62.84082370758761]
  CharXiv is a comprehensive evaluation suite involving 2,323 charts from arXiv papers. To ensure quality, all charts and questions are handpicked, curated, and verified by human experts. Results reveal a substantial, previously underestimated gap between the reasoning skills of the strongest proprietary model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-26T17:50:11Z)
• Enhancing Question Answering on Charts Through Effective Pre-training Tasks [26.571522748519584]
  We address the limitation of current VisualQA models when applied to charts and plots. Our findings indicate that existing models particularly underperform in answering questions related to the chart's structural and visual context. We propose three simple pre-training tasks that enforce the existing model in terms of both structural-visual knowledge, as well as its understanding of numerical questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-14T14:40:10Z)
• Multi-Modal Prompt Learning on Blind Image Quality Assessment [65.0676908930946]
  Image Quality Assessment (IQA) models benefit significantly from semantic information, which allows them to treat different types of objects distinctly. Traditional methods, hindered by a lack of sufficiently annotated data, have employed the CLIP image-text pretraining model as their backbone to gain semantic awareness. Recent approaches have attempted to address this mismatch using prompt technology, but these solutions have shortcomings. This paper introduces an innovative multi-modal prompt-based methodology for IQA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T11:45:32Z)
• TextSquare: Scaling up Text-Centric Visual Instruction Tuning [62.878378882175284]
  We introduce a new approach for creating a massive, high-quality instruction-tuning dataset, Square-10M.<n>Our model, TextSquare, considerably surpasses open-source previous state-of-the-art Text-centric MLLMs.<n>It even outperforms top-tier models like GPT4V and Gemini in 6 of 10 text-centric benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-19T11:38:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.