Towards Valid Student Simulation with Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.05473v1
- Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2026 02:09:52 GMT
- Title: Towards Valid Student Simulation with Large Language Models
- Authors: Zhihao Yuan, Yunze Xiao, Ming Li, Weihao Xuan, Richard Tong, Mona Diab, Tom Mitchell,
- Abstract summary: The paper reframes student simulation as a constrained generation problem governed by an explicit Epistemic State Specification (ESS)<n>The work further introduces a Goal-by-Environment framework to situate simulated student systems according to behavioral objectives and deployment contexts.
- Score: 12.732686135613214
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: This paper presents a conceptual and methodological framework for large language model (LLM) based student simulation in educational settings. The authors identify a core failure mode, termed the "competence paradox" in which broadly capable LLMs are asked to emulate partially knowledgeable learners, leading to unrealistic error patterns and learning dynamics. To address this, the paper reframes student simulation as a constrained generation problem governed by an explicit Epistemic State Specification (ESS), which defines what a simulated learner can access, how errors are structured, and how learner state evolves over time. The work further introduces a Goal-by-Environment framework to situate simulated student systems according to behavioral objectives and deployment contexts. Rather than proposing a new system or benchmark, the paper synthesizes prior literature, formalizes key design dimensions, and articulates open challenges related to validity, evaluation, and ethical risks. Overall, the paper argues for epistemic fidelity over surface realism as a prerequisite for using LLM-based simulated students as reliable scientific and pedagogical instruments.
Related papers
- ElecTwit: A Framework for Studying Persuasion in Multi-Agent Social Systems [0.0]
ElecTwit is a simulation framework designed to study persuasion within multi-agent systems.<n>We observed the comprehensive use of 25 specific persuasion techniques across most tested LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-02T22:10:09Z) - Simulating Students with Large Language Models: A Review of Architecture, Mechanisms, and Role Modelling in Education with Generative AI [0.8703455323398351]
Review of studies using large language models (LLMs) to simulate student behaviour across educational environments.<n>Wee current evidence on the capacity of LLM-based agents to emulate learner archetypes, respond to instructional inputs, and interact within multi-agent classroom scenarios.<n>We examine the implications of such systems for curriculum development, instructional evaluation, and teacher training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-08T17:23:13Z) - The Imperfect Learner: Incorporating Developmental Trajectories in Memory-based Student Simulation [55.722188569369656]
This paper introduces a novel framework for memory-based student simulation.<n>It incorporates developmental trajectories through a hierarchical memory mechanism with structured knowledge representation.<n>In practice, we implement a curriculum-aligned simulator grounded on the Next Generation Science Standards.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-08T08:05:43Z) - Doing Things with Words: Rethinking Theory of Mind Simulation in Large Language Models [48.815314312823006]
This study explores whether the Generative Agent-Based Model (GABM) Concordia can effectively model Theory of Mind (ToM) within simulated real-world environments.<n>We assess whether this framework successfully simulates ToM abilities and whether GPT-4 can perform tasks by making genuine inferences from social context.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-15T10:48:31Z) - Integrating LLM in Agent-Based Social Simulation: Opportunities and Challenges [0.7739037410679168]
The paper reviews recent findings on the ability of Large Language Models to replicate key aspects of human cognition.<n>The second part surveys emerging applications of LLMs in multi-agent simulation frameworks.<n>The paper concludes by advocating for hybrid approaches that integrate LLMs into traditional agent-based modeling platforms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-25T15:15:35Z) - Information Science Principles of Machine Learning: A Causal Chain Meta-Framework Based on Formalized Information Mapping [7.299890614172539]
This study addresses key challenges in machine learning, namely the absence of a unified formal theoretical framework and the lack of foundational theories for model interpretability and ethical safety.<n>We first construct a formal information model, explicitly defining the ontological states and carrier mappings of typical machine learning stages.<n>By introducing learnable and processable predicates, as well as learning and processing functions, we analyze the causal chain logic and constraint laws governing machine learning processes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-19T14:39:41Z) - Causality can systematically address the monsters under the bench(marks) [64.36592889550431]
Benchmarks are plagued by various biases, artifacts, or leakage.<n>Models may behave unreliably due to poorly explored failure modes.<n> causality offers an ideal framework to systematically address these challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-07T17:01:37Z) - Language Agents Meet Causality -- Bridging LLMs and Causal World Models [50.79984529172807]
We propose a framework that integrates causal representation learning with large language models.
This framework learns a causal world model, with causal variables linked to natural language expressions.
We evaluate the framework on causal inference and planning tasks across temporal scales and environmental complexities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-25T18:36:37Z) - LLM-based Cognitive Models of Students with Misconceptions [55.29525439159345]
This paper investigates whether Large Language Models (LLMs) can be instruction-tuned to meet this dual requirement.
We introduce MalAlgoPy, a novel Python library that generates datasets reflecting authentic student solution patterns.
Our insights enhance our understanding of AI-based student models and pave the way for effective adaptive learning systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-16T06:51:09Z) - Can LLMs Reliably Simulate Human Learner Actions? A Simulation Authoring Framework for Open-Ended Learning Environments [1.4999444543328293]
Simulating learner actions helps stress-test open-ended interactive learning environments and prototype new adaptations before deployment.
We propose Hyp-Mix, a simulation authoring framework that allows experts to develop and evaluate simulations by combining testable hypotheses about learner behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-03T00:25:40Z) - Explainability for Large Language Models: A Survey [59.67574757137078]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in natural language processing.
This paper introduces a taxonomy of explainability techniques and provides a structured overview of methods for explaining Transformer-based language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-02T22:14:26Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.