Empirical Characterization of Logging Smells in Machine Learning Code

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.05540v1
• Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2026 05:48:42 GMT
• Title: Empirical Characterization of Logging Smells in Machine Learning Code
• Abstract summary: This study aims to empirically identify and characterize logging smells in machine learning systems.<n>We propose to conduct a large-scale mining of open-source ML repositories hosted on GitHub to catalogue recurring logging smells.
• Score: 7.520925824033758
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: \underline{Context:} Logging is a fundamental yet complex practice in software engineering, essential for monitoring, debugging, and auditing software systems. With the increasing integration of machine learning (ML) components into software systems, effective logging has become critical to ensure reproducibility, traceability, and observability throughout model training and deployment. Although various general-purpose and ML-specific logging frameworks exist, little is known about how these tools are actually used in practice or whether ML practitioners adopt consistent and effective logging strategies. To date, no empirical study has systematically characterized recurring bad logging practices--or logging smells--in ML System. \underline{Goal:} This study aims to empirically identify and characterize logging smells in ML systems, providing an evidence-based understanding of how logging is implemented and challenged in practice. \underline{Method:} We propose to conduct a large-scale mining of open-source ML repositories hosted on GitHub to catalogue recurring logging smells. Subsequently, a practitioner survey involving ML engineers will be conducted to assess the perceived relevance, severity, and frequency of the identified smells. \underline{Limitations:} % While The study's limitations include that While our findings may not be generalizable to closed-source industrial projects, we believe our study provides an essential step toward understanding and improving logging practices in ML development.

Related papers

• Empirical Characterization of Logging Smells in Machine Learning Code [7.520925824033758]
  We present an empirical study of logging smells in machine learning (ML) projects.<n>We identify 12 categories of logging smells spanning security, metric management, configuration, verbosity, and context-related issues.<n>Our results show that logging smells are widespread in ML systems and vary in frequency and manifestation across projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-24T23:01:40Z)
• Understanding by Reconstruction: Reversing the Software Development Process for LLM Pretraining [66.89012795621349]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with the deep, long-horizon reasoning required for complex software engineering.<n>We propose a novel paradigm: understanding via reconstruction.<n>We introduce a framework that synthesizes latent agentic trajectories using a multi-agent simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T09:23:20Z)
• A Causal Perspective on Measuring, Explaining and Mitigating Smells in LLM-Generated Code [49.09545217453401]
  Propensity Smelly Score (PSC) is a metric that estimates the likelihood of generating particular smell types.<n>We identify how generation strategy, model size, model architecture and prompt formulation shape the structural properties of generated code.<n> PSC helps developers interpret model behavior and assess code quality, providing evidence that smell propensity signals can support human judgement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-19T19:18:28Z)
• Last Layer Logits to Logic: Empowering LLMs with Logic-Consistent Structured Knowledge Reasoning [55.55968342644846]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve excellent performance in natural language reasoning tasks through pre-training on vast unstructured text.<n>We propose the textitLogits-to-Logic framework, which incorporates logits strengthening and logits filtering as core modules to correct logical defects in LLM outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-11T07:08:27Z)
• Automatic Identification of Machine Learning-Specific Code Smells [2.7825105949430293]
  This work investigates suitable methods and tools to design and develop a static code analysis tool (MLpylint) based on code smell criteria.<n>We evaluated the tool on data from 160 open-source ML applications sourced from GitHub.<n>The results indicate the effectiveness and usefulness of the MLpylint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T15:51:15Z)
• System Log Parsing with Large Language Models: A Review [2.2779174914142346]
  Large language models (LLMs) have introduced the new research field of LLM-based log parsing.<n>Despite promising results, there is no structured overview of the approaches in this relatively new research field.<n>This work systematically reviews 29 LLM-based log parsing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T09:41:04Z)
• Studying and Benchmarking Large Language Models For Log Level Suggestion [49.176736212364496]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have become a focal point of research across various domains. This paper investigates the impact of characteristics and learning paradigms on the performance of 12 open-source LLMs in log level suggestion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T03:52:17Z)
• LLM Inference Unveiled: Survey and Roofline Model Insights [62.92811060490876]
  Large Language Model (LLM) inference is rapidly evolving, presenting a unique blend of opportunities and challenges. Our survey stands out from traditional literature reviews by not only summarizing the current state of research but also by introducing a framework based on roofline model. This framework identifies the bottlenecks when deploying LLMs on hardware devices and provides a clear understanding of practical problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T07:33:05Z)
• Exploring the Effectiveness of LLMs in Automated Logging Generation: An Empirical Study [32.53659676826846]
  This paper performs the first study on exploring large language models (LLMs) for logging statement generation. We first build a logging statement generation dataset, LogBench, with two parts: (1) LogBench-O: logging statements collected from GitHub repositories, and (2) LogBench-T: the transformed unseen code from LogBench-O.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-12T06:32:51Z)
• Reasonable Scale Machine Learning with Open-Source Metaflow [2.637746074346334]
  We argue that re-purposing existing tools won't solve the current productivity issues. We introduce Metaflow, an open-source framework for ML projects explicitly designed to boost the productivity of data practitioners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-21T11:28:09Z)
• LogLAB: Attention-Based Labeling of Log Data Anomalies via Weak Supervision [63.08516384181491]
  We present LogLAB, a novel modeling approach for automated labeling of log messages without requiring manual work by experts. Our method relies on estimated failure time windows provided by monitoring systems to produce precise labeled datasets in retrospect. Our evaluation shows that LogLAB consistently outperforms nine benchmark approaches across three different datasets and maintains an F1-score of more than 0.98 even at large failure time windows.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-02T15:16:08Z)
• Linnaeus: A highly reusable and adaptable ML based log classification pipeline [2.2099003320482393]
  In recent times there has been more emphasis on statistical and machine learning (ML) based methods for analyzing logs. In this paper we demonstrate our end-to-end log classification pipeline, Linnaeus. We also demonstrate our solutions for adaptability and re-use, integration towards large scale software development processes, and how we cope with lack of labelled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-11T19:58:53Z)
• Self-Supervised Log Parsing [59.04636530383049]
  Large-scale software systems generate massive volumes of semi-structured log records. Existing approaches rely on log-specifics or manual rule extraction. We propose NuLog that utilizes a self-supervised learning model and formulates the parsing task as masked language modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-17T19:25:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.