Socio-technical aspects of Agentic AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06064v1
• Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2025 10:56:00 GMT
• Title: Socio-technical aspects of Agentic AI
• Authors: Praveen Kumar Donta, Alaa Saleh, Ying Li, Shubham Vaishnav, Kai Fang, Hailin Feng, Yuchao Xia, Thippa Reddy Gadekallu, Qiyang Zhang, Xiaodan Shi, Ali Beikmohammadi, Sindri Magnússon, Ilir Murturi, Chinmaya Kumar Dehury, Marcin Paprzycki, Lauri Loven, Sasu Tarkoma, Schahram Dustdar,
• Abstract summary: Agentic Artificial Intelligence (AI) represents a fundamental shift in the design of intelligent systems.<n>Recent research on agentic AI has largely focused on technical foundations.<n>This paper presents a socio-technical analysis of agentic AI that explicitly connects core technical components with societal context.
• Score: 20.858222661070787
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Agentic Artificial Intelligence (AI) represents a fundamental shift in the design of intelligent systems, characterized by interconnected components that collectively enable autonomous perception, reasoning, planning, action, and learning. Recent research on agentic AI has largely focused on technical foundations, including system architectures, reasoning and planning mechanisms, coordination strategies, and application-level performance across domains. However, the societal, ethical, economic, environmental, and governance implications of agentic AI remain weakly integrated into these technical treatments. This paper addresses this gap by presenting a socio-technical analysis of agentic AI that explicitly connects core technical components with societal context. We examine how architectural choices in perception, cognition, planning, execution, and memory introduce dependencies related to data governance, accountability, transparency, safety, and sustainability. To structure this analysis, we adopt the MAD-BAD-SAD construct as an analytical lens, capturing motivations, applications, and moral dilemmas (MAD); biases, accountability, and dangers (BAD); and societal impact, adoption, and design considerations (SAD). Using this lens, we analyze ethical considerations, implications, and challenges arising from contemporary agentic AI systems and assess their manifestation across emerging applications, including healthcare, education, industry, smart and sustainable cities, social services, communications and networking, and earth observation and satellite communications. The paper further identifies open challenges and suggests future research directions, framing agentic AI as an integrated socio-technical system whose behavior and impact are co-produced by algorithms, data, organizational practices, regulatory frameworks, and social norms.

Related papers

• AI Deception: Risks, Dynamics, and Controls [153.71048309527225]
  This project provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the AI deception field.<n>We identify a formal definition of AI deception, grounded in signaling theory from studies of animal deception.<n>We organize the landscape of AI deception research as a deception cycle, consisting of two key components: deception emergence and deception treatment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T16:56:04Z)
• Empowering Real-World: A Survey on the Technology, Practice, and Evaluation of LLM-driven Industry Agents [63.03252293761656]
  This paper systematically reviews the technologies, applications, and evaluation methods of industry agents based on large language models (LLMs)<n>We examine the three key technological pillars that support the advancement of agent capabilities: Memory, Planning, and Tool Use.<n>We provide an overview of the application of industry agents in real-world domains such as digital engineering, scientific discovery, embodied intelligence, collaborative business execution, and complex system simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T12:46:55Z)
• A Study on the Framework for Evaluating the Ethics and Trustworthiness of Generative AI [6.664765506069473]
  generative AI, such as ChatGPT, demonstrates remarkable innovative potential.<n>It simultaneously raises ethical and social concerns, including bias, harmfulness, copyright infringement, privacy violations, and hallucination.<n>This study emphasizes the need for new human_centered criteria that also reflect social impact.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-30T07:38:07Z)
• A Survey on Cloud-Edge-Terminal Collaborative Intelligence in AIoT Networks [49.90474228895655]
  Cloud-edge-terminal collaborative intelligence (CETCI) is a fundamental paradigm within the artificial intelligence of things (AIoT) community.<n>CETCI has made significant progress with emerging AIoT applications, moving beyond isolated layer optimization to deployable collaborative intelligence systems.<n>This survey describes foundational architectures, enabling technologies, and scenarios of CETCI paradigms, offering a tutorial-style review for CISAIOT beginners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-26T08:38:01Z)
• A Comprehensive Review of AI Agents: Transforming Possibilities in Technology and Beyond [3.96715377510494]
  Review aims to guide the next generation of AI agent systems toward more robust, adaptable, and trustworthy autonomous intelligence.<n>We synthesize insights from cognitive science-inspired models, hierarchical reinforcement learning frameworks, and large language model-based reasoning.<n>We discuss the pressing ethical, safety, and interpretability concerns associated with deploying these agents in real-world scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-16T07:38:45Z)
• Agentic AI Frameworks: Architectures, Protocols, and Design Challenges [0.0]
  Large Language Models have ushered in a transformative paradigm in artificial intelligence, where intelligent agents exhibit goal-directed autonomy, contextual reasoning, and dynamic multi-agent coordination.<n>This paper provides a systematic review and comparative analysis of leading Agentic AI frameworks, including CrewAI, LangGraph, AutoGen, Semantic Kernel, Agno, Google ADK, and MetaGPT.<n>We identify key limitations, emerging trends, and open challenges in the field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-13T19:16:18Z)
• Never Compromise to Vulnerabilities: A Comprehensive Survey on AI Governance [211.5823259429128]
  We propose a comprehensive framework integrating technical and societal dimensions, structured around three interconnected pillars: Intrinsic Security, Derivative Security, and Social Ethics.<n>We identify three core challenges: (1) the generalization gap, where defenses fail against evolving threats; (2) inadequate evaluation protocols that overlook real-world risks; and (3) fragmented regulations leading to inconsistent oversight.<n>Our framework offers actionable guidance for researchers, engineers, and policymakers to develop AI systems that are not only robust and secure but also ethically aligned and publicly trustworthy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T09:42:56Z)
• Agentic AI in Product Management: A Co-Evolutionary Model [0.0]
  This study explores agentic AI's transformative role in product management.<n>It proposes a conceptual co-evolutionary framework to guide its integration across the product lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-01T02:32:32Z)
• AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challenges [3.7414278978078204]
  This review critically distinguishes between AI Agents and Agentic AI, offering a structured, conceptual taxonomy, application mapping, and analysis of opportunities and challenges to clarify their divergent design philosophies and capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-15T16:21:33Z)
• Advances and Challenges in Foundation Agents: From Brain-Inspired Intelligence to Evolutionary, Collaborative, and Safe Systems [132.77459963706437]
  This book provides a comprehensive overview, framing intelligent agents within modular, brain-inspired architectures.<n>It explores self-enhancement and adaptive evolution mechanisms, exploring how agents autonomously refine their capabilities.<n>It also examines the collective intelligence emerging from agent interactions, cooperation, and societal structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T18:00:29Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.