Related papers: Bridging the AI divide in sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and opportunities for inclusivity

Bridging the AI divide in sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and opportunities for inclusivity

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06145v1
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2026 18:18:43 GMT
Title: Bridging the AI divide in sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and opportunities for inclusivity
Authors: Masike Malatji,
Abstract summary: This study investigates the extent of AI readiness among the top SSA countries using the 2024 Government AI Readiness Index.<n>A comparative analysis of AI readiness scores highlights disparities across nations.<n>Mauritius (53.94) and South Africa (52.91) leading, while Zambia (42.58) and Uganda (43.32) lag.
Score: 0.0
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Abstract: The artificial intelligence (AI) digital divide in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) presents significant disparities in AI access, adoption, and development due to varying levels of infrastructure, education, and policy support. This study investigates the extent of AI readiness among the top SSA countries using the 2024 Government AI Readiness Index, alongside an analysis of AI initiatives to foster inclusivity. A comparative analysis of AI readiness scores highlights disparities across nations, with Mauritius (53.94) and South Africa (52.91) leading, while Zambia (42.58) and Uganda (43.32) lag. Quartile analysis reveals a concentration of AI preparedness among a few nations, suggesting uneven AI development. The study further examines the relationship between AI readiness and economic indicators, identifying instances where AI progress does not strictly correlate with Gross Domestic Product per capita, as seen in Rwanda and Uganda. Using case studies of AI initiatives across SSA, this research contextualises quantitative findings, identifying key strategies contributing to AI inclusivity, including talent development programs, research networks, and policy interventions. The study concludes with recommendations to bridge the AI digital divide, emphasising investments in AI education, localised AI solutions, and cross-country collaborations to accelerate AI adoption in SSA.

Related papers

Advancing AI Challenges for the United States Department of the Air Force [91.02589169578908]
The DAF-MIT AI Accelerator is a collaboration between the United States Department of the Air Force (DAF) and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)<n>This article supplements our previous publication, which introduced AI Accelerator challenges.<n>We provide an update on how ongoing and new challenges have successfully contributed to AI research and applications of AI technologies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-31T21:34:57Z)
The Singapore Consensus on Global AI Safety Research Priorities [128.58674892183657]
"2025 Singapore Conference on AI (SCAI): International Scientific Exchange on AI Safety" aimed to support research in this space.<n>Report builds on the International AI Safety Report chaired by Yoshua Bengio and backed by 33 governments.<n>Report organises AI safety research domains into three types: challenges with creating trustworthy AI systems (Development), challenges with evaluating their risks (Assessment) and challenges with monitoring and intervening after deployment (Control)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-25T17:59:50Z)
The AI Pentad, the CHARME$^{2}$D Model, and an Assessment of Current-State AI Regulation [5.231576332164012]
This paper aims to establish a unifying model for AI regulation from the perspective of core AI components.<n>We first introduce the AI Pentad, which comprises the five essential components of AI.<n>We then review AI regulatory enablers, including AI registration and disclosure, AI monitoring, and AI enforcement mechanisms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-08T22:58:41Z)
AI for All: Identifying AI incidents Related to Diversity and Inclusion [5.364403920214549]
This study identifies and understanding D&I issues within AI systems through a manual analysis of AI incident databases. Almost half of the analyzed AI incidents are related to D&I, with a notable predominance of racial, gender, and age discrimination.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-19T08:54:56Z)
The Narrow Depth and Breadth of Corporate Responsible AI Research [3.364518262921329]
We show that the majority of AI firms show limited or no engagement in this critical subfield of AI. Leading AI firms exhibit significantly lower output in responsible AI research compared to their conventional AI research. Our results highlight the urgent need for industry to publicly engage in responsible AI research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-20T17:26:43Z)
Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
General purpose AI seems to have lowered the barriers for the public to use AI and harness its power. We introduce PARTICIP-AI, a framework for laypeople to speculate and assess AI use cases and their impacts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z)
Case Studies of AI Policy Development in Africa [1.3194391758295114]
Artificial Intelligence (AI) requires new ways of evaluating national technology use and strategy for African nations. We conclude that existing global readiness assessments do not fully capture African states' progress in AI readiness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-29T19:17:11Z)
AI for social science and social science of AI: A Survey [47.5235291525383]
Recent advancements in artificial intelligence have sparked a rethinking of artificial general intelligence possibilities. The increasing human-like capabilities of AI are also attracting attention in social science research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-22T10:57:09Z)
Empowering Africa: An In-depth Exploration of the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence Across the Continent [0.0]
The study considers regional nuances, cultural factors, and infrastructural constraints shaping the deployment of AI solutions in Africa. Case studies in healthcare, agriculture, finance, and education highlight AI's transformative potential for efficiency, accessibility, and inclusivity. Ethical considerations, including data privacy and algorithmic bias, are addressed alongside policy frameworks supporting responsible AI implementation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-28T12:07:13Z)
The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and Strategies [97.5153823429076]
The benefits, challenges and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed. The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods are also discussed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-08T23:23:39Z)
Stakeholder Participation in AI: Beyond "Add Diverse Stakeholders and Stir" [76.44130385507894]
This paper aims to ground what we dub a 'participatory turn' in AI design by synthesizing existing literature on participation and through empirical analysis of its current practices. Based on our literature synthesis and empirical research, this paper presents a conceptual framework for analyzing participatory approaches to AI design.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-01T17:57:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.