The Psychology of Learning from Machines: Anthropomorphic AI and the Paradox of Automation in Education

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06172v1
• Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2026 08:28:33 GMT
• Title: The Psychology of Learning from Machines: Anthropomorphic AI and the Paradox of Automation in Education
• Authors: Junaid Qadir, Muhammad Mumtaz,
• Abstract summary: This work synthesizes four research traditions to establish a comprehensive framework for understanding how learners psychologically relate to anthropomorphic AI tutors.<n>We identify three persistent challenges intensified by Generative AI's conversational fluency.<n>We ground this theoretical synthesis through comparative analysis of over 104,984 YouTube comments across AI-generated philosophical debates and human-created engineering tutorials.
• Score: 1.8217623940980625
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As AI tutors enter classrooms at unprecedented speed, their deployment increasingly outpaces our grasp of the psychological and social consequences of such technology. Yet decades of research in automation psychology, human factors, and human-computer interaction provide crucial insights that remain underutilized in educational AI design. This work synthesizes four research traditions -- automation psychology, human factors engineering, HCI, and philosophy of technology -- to establish a comprehensive framework for understanding how learners psychologically relate to anthropomorphic AI tutors. We identify three persistent challenges intensified by Generative AI's conversational fluency. First, learners exhibit dual trust calibration failures -- automation bias (uncritical acceptance) and algorithm aversion (excessive rejection after errors) -- with an expertise paradox where novices overrely while experts underrely. Second, while anthropomorphic design enhances engagement, it can distract from learning and foster harmful emotional attachment. Third, automation ironies persist: systems meant to aid cognition introduce designer errors, degrade skills through disuse, and create monitoring burdens humans perform poorly. We ground this theoretical synthesis through comparative analysis of over 104,984 YouTube comments across AI-generated philosophical debates and human-created engineering tutorials, revealing domain-dependent trust patterns and strong anthropomorphic projection despite minimal cues. For engineering education, our synthesis mandates differentiated approaches: AI tutoring for technical foundations where automation bias is manageable through proper scaffolding, but human facilitation for design, ethics, and professional judgment where tacit knowledge transmission proves irreplaceable.

Related papers

• Psychological Factors Influencing University Students Trust in AI-Based Learning Assistants [0.0]
  This paper adopts a psychology oriented perspective to examine how university students form trust in AI based learning assistants.<n>We propose a conceptual framework that organizes psychological predictors of trust into four groups: cognitive appraisals, affective reactions, social relational factors, and contextual moderators.<n>The paper highlights that trust in AI is a psychological process shaped by individual differences and learning environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-19T09:44:43Z)
• Bridging Minds and Machines: Toward an Integration of AI and Cognitive Science [48.38628297686686]
  Cognitive Science has profoundly shaped disciplines such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), Philosophy, Psychology, Neuroscience, Linguistics, and Culture.<n>Many breakthroughs in AI trace their roots to cognitive theories, while AI itself has become an indispensable tool for advancing cognitive research.<n>We argue that the future of AI within Cognitive Science lies not only in improving performance but also in constructing systems that deepen our understanding of the human mind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T11:26:17Z)
• AI Automatons: AI Systems Intended to Imitate Humans [54.19152688545896]
  There is a growing proliferation of AI systems designed to mimic people's behavior, work, abilities, likenesses, or humanness.<n>The research, design, deployment, and availability of such AI systems have prompted growing concerns about a wide range of possible legal, ethical, and other social impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T03:55:38Z)
• The AI Interface: Designing for the Ideal Machine-Human Experience (Editorial) [1.8074330674710588]
  This editorial introduces a Special Issue that explores the psychology of AI experience design.<n>Papers in this collection highlight the complexities of trust, transparency, and emotional sensitivity in human-AI interaction.<n>By findings from eight diverse studies, this editorial underscores the need for AI interfaces to balance efficiency with empathy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-29T15:17:32Z)
• Aligning Generalisation Between Humans and Machines [74.120848518198]
  AI technology can support humans in scientific discovery and forming decisions, but may also disrupt democracies and target individuals.<n>The responsible use of AI and its participation in human-AI teams increasingly shows the need for AI alignment.<n>A crucial yet often overlooked aspect of these interactions is the different ways in which humans and machines generalise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T18:36:07Z)
• Imagining and building wise machines: The centrality of AI metacognition [78.76893632793497]
  We examine what is known about human wisdom and sketch a vision of its AI counterpart.<n>We argue that AI systems particularly struggle with metacognition.<n>We discuss how wise AI might be benchmarked, trained, and implemented.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T18:10:10Z)
• Shifting the Human-AI Relationship: Toward a Dynamic Relational Learning-Partner Model [0.0]
  We advocate for a shift toward viewing AI as a learning partner, akin to a student who learns from interactions with humans. We suggest that a "third mind" emerges through collaborative human-AI relationships.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T19:19:39Z)
• The Interplay of Learning, Analytics, and Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Vision for Hybrid Intelligence [0.45207442500313766]
  I challenge the prevalent narrow conceptualisation of AI as tools, and argue for the importance of alternative conceptualisations of AI. I highlight the differences between human intelligence and artificial information processing, and posit that AI can also serve as an instrument for understanding human learning. The paper presents three unique conceptualisations of AI: the externalization of human cognition, the internalization of AI models to influence human mental models, and the extension of human cognition via tightly coupled human-AI hybrid intelligence systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-24T10:07:46Z)
• Enabling High-Level Machine Reasoning with Cognitive Neuro-Symbolic Systems [67.01132165581667]
  We propose to enable high-level reasoning in AI systems by integrating cognitive architectures with external neuro-symbolic components. We illustrate a hybrid framework centered on ACT-R and we discuss the role of generative models in recent and future applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T21:20:17Z)
• World Models and Predictive Coding for Cognitive and Developmental Robotics: Frontiers and Challenges [51.92834011423463]
  We focus on the two concepts of world models and predictive coding. In neuroscience, predictive coding proposes that the brain continuously predicts its inputs and adapts to model its own dynamics and control behavior in its environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-14T06:38:14Z)
• BIASeD: Bringing Irrationality into Automated System Design [12.754146668390828]
  We claim that the future of human-machine collaboration will entail the development of AI systems that model, understand and possibly replicate human cognitive biases. We categorize existing cognitive biases from the perspective of AI systems, identify three broad areas of interest and outline research directions for the design of AI systems that have a better understanding of our own biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-01T02:52:38Z)
• Learning to Complement Humans [67.38348247794949]
  A rising vision for AI in the open world centers on the development of systems that can complement humans for perceptual, diagnostic, and reasoning tasks. We demonstrate how an end-to-end learning strategy can be harnessed to optimize the combined performance of human-machine teams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T20:00:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.