ToolGym: an Open-world Tool-using Environment for Scalable Agent Testing and Data Curation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06328v1
- Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2026 21:59:31 GMT
- Title: ToolGym: an Open-world Tool-using Environment for Scalable Agent Testing and Data Curation
- Authors: Ziqiao Xi, Shuang Liang, Qi Liu, Jiaqing Zhang, Letian Peng, Fang Nan, Meshal Nayim, Tianhui Zhang, Rishika Mundada, Lianhui Qin, Biwei Huang, Kun Zhou,
- Abstract summary: We introduce an open-world tool-using environment, built on 5,571 format unified tools across 204 commonly used apps.<n>It includes a task creation engine that synthesizes longhorizon, multi-tool with wild constraints, and a state controller that injects interruptions and failures to stress-test robustness.<n> Comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art LLMs reveals the misalignment between tool planning and execution abilities, the constraint following weakness of existing LLMs, and DeepSeek-v3.2's strongest robustness.
- Score: 42.479399507055454
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Tool-using LLM agents still struggle in open-world settings with large tool pools, long-horizon objectives, wild constraints, and unreliable tool states. For scalable and realistic training and testing, we introduce an open-world tool-using environment, built on 5,571 format unified tools across 204 commonly used apps. It includes a task creation engine that synthesizes long-horizon, multi-tool workflows with wild constraints, and a state controller that injects interruptions and failures to stress-test robustness. On top of this environment, we develop a tool select-then-execute agent framework with a planner-actor decomposition to separate deliberate reasoning and self-correction from step-wise execution. Comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art LLMs reveals the misalignment between tool planning and execution abilities, the constraint following weakness of existing LLMs, and DeepSeek-v3.2's strongest robustness. Finally, we collect 1,170 trajectories from our environment to fine-tune LLMs, achieving superior performance to baselines using 119k samples, indicating the environment's value as both a realistic benchmark and a data engine for tool-using agents. Our code and data will be publicly released.
Related papers
- Learning to Rewrite Tool Descriptions for Reliable LLM-Agent Tool Use [21.666294374943178]
We propose a curriculum learning framework that transfers supervision from trace-rich settings to trace-free deployment.<n> Experiments show consistent gains on unseen tools, strong cross-domain generalization, and robustness as the number of candidate tools scales to over 100.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-23T23:50:24Z) - Gecko: A Simulation Environment with Stateful Feedback for Refining Agent Tool Calls [56.407063247662336]
We introduce Gecko, a comprehensive environment that simulates tool responses using a combination of rules and LLMs.<n>GATS consistently improves the tool calling performance of various LLMs including GPT-4o, GPT-5, and Gemini-3.0-pro.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-22T15:02:00Z) - ML-Tool-Bench: Tool-Augmented Planning for ML Tasks [23.54937738755734]
We introduce a benchmark for evaluating tool-augmented machine learning agents.<n>Our benchmark goes beyond traditional tool-use evaluation by incorporating an in-memory named object management.<n>Our approach improves over ReAct by 16.52 percentile positions, taking the median across all Kaggle challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-29T23:59:40Z) - DeepAgent: A General Reasoning Agent with Scalable Toolsets [111.6384541877723]
DeepAgent is an end-to-end deep reasoning agent that performs autonomous thinking, tool discovery, and action execution.<n>To address the challenges of long-horizon interactions, we introduce an autonomous memory folding mechanism that compresses past interactions into structured episodic, working, and tool memories.<n>We develop an end-to-end reinforcement learning strategy, namely ToolPO, that leverages LLM-simulated APIs and applies tool-call advantage attribution to assign fine-grained credit to the tool invocation tokens.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-24T16:24:01Z) - MCPVerse: An Expansive, Real-World Benchmark for Agentic Tool Use [72.53177559476704]
We introduce MCPVerse, a real-world benchmark for evaluating agentic tool use.<n> MCPVerse integrates more than 550 real-world, executable tools to create an unprecedented action space exceeding 140k tokens.<n>We benchmarked the state-of-the-art LLMs across three modes (Oracle, Standard, and Max-Scale)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-22T09:47:53Z) - ThinkGeo: Evaluating Tool-Augmented Agents for Remote Sensing Tasks [64.86209459039313]
ThinkGeo is an agentic benchmark designed to evaluate tool-augmented agents on remote sensing tasks via structured tool use and multi-step planning.<n>We implement a ReAct-style interaction loop and evaluate both open and closed-source LLMs on 486 structured agentic tasks with 1,773 expert-verified reasoning steps.<n>Our analysis reveals notable disparities in tool accuracy and planning consistency across models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-29T17:59:38Z) - LLM Agents Making Agent Tools [2.5529148902034637]
Tool use has turned large language models (LLMs) into powerful agents that can perform complex multi-step tasks.<n>But these tools must be implemented in advance by human developers.<n>We propose ToolMaker, an agentic framework that autonomously transforms papers with code into LLM-compatible tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T11:44:11Z) - Planning, Creation, Usage: Benchmarking LLMs for Comprehensive Tool Utilization in Real-World Complex Scenarios [93.68764280953624]
UltraTool is a novel benchmark designed to improve and evaluate Large Language Models' ability in tool utilization.
It emphasizes real-world complexities, demanding accurate, multi-step planning for effective problem-solving.
A key feature of UltraTool is its independent evaluation of planning with natural language, which happens before tool usage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-30T16:52:56Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.