Lightweight Yet Secure: Secure Scripting Language Generation via Lightweight LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06419v1
• Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 04:00:56 GMT
• Title: Lightweight Yet Secure: Secure Scripting Language Generation via Lightweight LLMs
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in code generation, vulnerability detection, and automated repair for languages like Python and JavaScript.<n>We present SecGenEval-PS, a benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs on secure scripting generation, security analysis, and automated repair.<n>We propose PSSec, a framework that combines data synthesis with fine-tuning to enhance model security capabilities.
• Score: 14.355160053196824
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The security of scripting languages such as PowerShell is critical given their powerful automation and administration capabilities, often exercised with elevated privileges. Today, securing these languages still demands substantial human effort to craft and enforce rules, imposing heavy burdens on typical administrators and creating critical production risks (e.g., misoperations that shut down servers).Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in code generation, vulnerability detection, and automated repair for languages like Python and JavaScript. However, their ability to assist with generating secure scripting-language code remains largely underexplored. In this paper, we present SecGenEval-PS, a benchmark designed to systematically evaluate LLMs on secure scripting generation, security analysis, and automated repair. Our results show that both proprietary and open-source models fall short in these areas. For instance, over 60% of PowerShell scripts produced by GPT-4o and o3-mini are insecure without structured guidance.To bridge this gap, we propose PSSec, a framework that combines data synthesis with fine-tuning to enhance model security capabilities. We develop a self-debugging agent that integrates static analyzers with the reasoning abilities of advanced LLMs to synthesize large-scale structured triplets of insecure scripts, violation analyses, and corresponding repairs. We then fine-tune lightweight LLMs (as small as 1.7B parameters) using supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL), enabling security-aware reasoning and the generation of secure PowerShell code.Across multiple LLM families, including GPT and Qwen, \textit{PSSec}-trained models match or surpass general-purpose large models on PowerShell security tasks while reducing inference cost by more than an order of magnitude.

Related papers

• Is Vibe Coding the Future? An Empirical Assessment of LLM Generated Codes for Construction Safety [0.14504054468850666]
  This study empirically evaluates the reliability, software architecture, and domain-specific safety fidelity of 450 vibe-coded Python scripts.<n>Results reveal a highly significant relationship between user persona and data hallucination, demonstrating that less formal prompts drastically increase the AI's propensity to invent missing safety variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-14T05:42:29Z)
• Towards Automated Pentesting with Large Language Models [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are redefining offensive cybersecurity by allowing the generation of harmful machine code with minimal human intervention.<n>We present RedShell, a framework that generates malicious code targeting Microsoft Windows vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-13T17:41:51Z)
• Analysis of LLMs Against Prompt Injection and Jailbreak Attacks [7.685814179879813]
  This work evaluates prompt-injection and jailbreak vulnerability using a large, manually curated dataset.<n>We observe significant behavioural variation across models, including refusal responses and complete silent non-responsiveness triggered by internal safety mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-24T12:32:11Z)
• TypePilot: Leveraging the Scala Type System for Secure LLM-generated Code [46.747768845221735]
  Large language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable proficiency in code generation tasks across various programming languages.<n>Their outputs often contain subtle but critical vulnerabilities, posing significant risks when deployed in security-sensitive or mission-critical systems.<n>This paper introduces TypePilot, an agentic AI framework designed to enhance the security and robustness of LLM-generated code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T08:44:01Z)
• Are AI-Generated Fixes Secure? Analyzing LLM and Agent Patches on SWE-bench [9.229310642804036]
  We present the first large-scale security analysis of LLM-generated patches using 20,000+ issues from the SWE-bench dataset.<n>We evaluate patches produced by a standalone LLM (Llama 3.3) and compare them to developer-written patches.<n>We also assess the security of patches generated by three top-performing agentic frameworks (OpenHands, AutoCodeRover, HoneyComb) on a subset of our data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T21:10:19Z)
• Guiding AI to Fix Its Own Flaws: An Empirical Study on LLM-Driven Secure Code Generation [16.29310628754089]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have become powerful tools for automated code generation.<n>LLMs often overlook critical security practices, which can result in the generation of insecure code.<n>This paper examines their inherent tendencies to produce insecure code, their capability to generate secure code when guided by self-generated vulnerability hints, and their effectiveness in repairing vulnerabilities when provided with different levels of feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-28T23:24:33Z)
• From Vulnerabilities to Remediation: A Systematic Literature Review of LLMs in Code Security [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for automating various programming tasks.<n>LLMs could introduce vulnerabilities unbeknown to the programmer.<n>When analyzing code, they could miss clear vulnerabilities or signal nonexistent ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T16:20:22Z)
• Iterative Self-Tuning LLMs for Enhanced Jailbreaking Capabilities [50.980446687774645]
  We introduce ADV-LLM, an iterative self-tuning process that crafts adversarial LLMs with enhanced jailbreak ability.<n>Our framework significantly reduces the computational cost of generating adversarial suffixes while achieving nearly 100% ASR on various open-source LLMs.<n>It exhibits strong attack transferability to closed-source models, achieving 99% ASR on GPT-3.5 and 49% ASR on GPT-4, despite being optimized solely on Llama3.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T06:36:12Z)
• AgentHarm: A Benchmark for Measuring Harmfulness of LLM Agents [84.96249955105777]
  LLM agents may pose a greater risk if misused, but their robustness remains underexplored.<n>We propose a new benchmark called AgentHarm to facilitate research on LLM agent misuse.<n>We find leading LLMs are surprisingly compliant with malicious agent requests without jailbreaking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T17:39:22Z)
• How Well Do Large Language Models Serve as End-to-End Secure Code Agents for Python? [42.119319820752324]
  We studied GPT-3.5 and GPT-4's capability to identify and repair vulnerabilities in the code generated by four popular LLMs.<n>By manually or automatically reviewing 4,900 pieces of code, our study reveals that large language models lack awareness of scenario-relevant security risks.<n>To address the limitation of a single round of repair, we developed a lightweight tool that prompts LLMs to construct safer source code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T02:42:29Z)
• AdaShield: Safeguarding Multimodal Large Language Models from Structure-based Attack via Adaptive Shield Prompting [54.931241667414184]
  We propose textbfAdaptive textbfShield Prompting, which prepends inputs with defense prompts to defend MLLMs against structure-based jailbreak attacks. Our methods can consistently improve MLLMs' robustness against structure-based jailbreak attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T15:57:13Z)
• PPTC-R benchmark: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models for PowerPoint Task Completion [96.47420221442397]
  We construct adversarial user instructions by attacking user instructions at sentence, semantic, and multi-language levels. We test 3 closed-source and 4 open-source LLMs using a benchmark that incorporates robustness settings. We find that GPT-4 exhibits the highest performance and strong robustness in our benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-06T15:33:32Z)
• Attack Prompt Generation for Red Teaming and Defending Large Language Models [70.157691818224]
  Large language models (LLMs) are susceptible to red teaming attacks, which can induce LLMs to generate harmful content. We propose an integrated approach that combines manual and automatic methods to economically generate high-quality attack prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T06:15:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.