Architecting AgentOps Needs CHANGE

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06456v1
• Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 06:51:39 GMT
• Title: Architecting AgentOps Needs CHANGE
• Abstract summary: We argue that architecting Agentic AI systems requires a shift from managing control loops to enabling dynamic co-evolution among agents, infrastructure, and human oversight.<n>We introduce a conceptual framework comprising six capabilities for operationalizing Agentic AI systems: Contextualize, Harmonize, Anticipate, Negotiate, Generate, and Evolve.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The emergence of Agentic AI systems has outpaced the architectural thinking required to operate them effectively. These agents differ fundamentally from traditional software: their behavior is not fixed at deployment but continuously shaped by experience, feedback, and context. Applying operational principles inherited from DevOps or MLOps, built for deterministic software and traditional ML systems, assumes that system behavior can be managed through versioning, monitoring, and rollback. This assumption breaks down for Agentic AI systems whose learning trajectories diverge over time. This introduces non-determinism making system reliability a challenge at runtime. We argue that architecting such systems requires a shift from managing control loops to enabling dynamic co-evolution among agents, infrastructure, and human oversight. To guide this shift, we introduce CHANGE, a conceptual framework comprising six capabilities for operationalizing Agentic AI systems: Contextualize, Harmonize, Anticipate, Negotiate, Generate, and Evolve. CHANGE provides a foundation for architecting an AgentOps platform to manage the lifecycle of evolving Agentic AI systems, illustrated through a customer-support system scenario. In doing so, CHANGE redefines software architecture for an era where adaptation to uncertainty and continuous evolution are inherent properties of the system.

Related papers

• Agents in the Large: Perception-Centered Architecture for Persistent Agents [66.30987129595137]
  We propose a Perception-Centered Architecture for Persistent Agents (Pera)<n>Pera describes a persistent agent organized around perception and control components that continually perceive service-relevant signals.<n>We use Pera to retrospectively organize recent work, examine a detailed case study, and offer forward-looking insights for building more capable persistent agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-31T09:04:52Z)
• Graph Engineering in the Era of LLM Agents: From Individual Intelligence to System Intelligence [115.91847478507736]
  LLMs have evolved from language generators to autonomous agents capable of complex, long-horizon tasks.<n>Many tasks require heterogeneous expertise, interdependent subtasks, parallel execution, independent verification, and persistent state.<n>We call this System Intelligence: an agent system's ability to organize and coordinate multiple intelligent components into a coherent, adaptive whole.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-21T14:27:57Z)
• Co-Evolution in Agentic Systems: Toward Self-Directed Evolution Beyond Human Design [55.30329388138526]
  This survey focuses on co-evolution in agentic systems, a multi-component form of self-evolution in which multiple agents and their environment impose adaptive pressure on one another.<n>To organize existing papers, we propose a progressive three-stage taxonomy that traces how the system gradually sheds human-engineered constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-10T23:10:40Z)
• Self-Evolving Coding Agents [11.43197414613246]
  Self-evolving coding agents can inspect repositories, invoke tools, execute tests, debug failures, and generate patches.<n>We first define self-evolving coding agents and distinguish them from conventional coding agents and general self-evolving agents.<n>We find that executable feedback, repository-level context, and coding trajectories give software engineering a distinctive role as a natural domain for agent self-evolution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-04T09:43:46Z)
• From AI Technical Debt to Agentic Technical Debt: A Systematic Mapping of Root Causes and Manifestations in Agentic AI Systems [11.878368077620337]
  This paper introduces Agentic Technical Debt (AgTD), defined as technical debt that emerges, accumulates, propagates, and amplifies due to the autonomous and collaborative nature of Agentic AI systems.<n>We present the first systematic mapping of established AITDs to their agentic manifestations, showing how conventional debts evolve into system-level liabilities.<n>Our findings show that technical debt extends beyond software artifacts to encompass agent behaviors, coordination mechanisms, and interactions among agents, tools, and execution environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-02T05:09:28Z)
• Agentic Software: How AI Agents Are Restructuring the Software Paradigm [0.0]
  We argue that the emergence of AI agents constitutes a fundamental restructuring of what software is.<n>In the former, code is the carrier of pre-written decision logic; in the latter, the agent itself is the decision logic.<n>We conclude with a four-stage roadmap toward self-evolving agent ecosystems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-04T02:30:06Z)
• Loosely-Structured Software: Engineering Context, Structure, and Evolution Entropy in Runtime-Rewired Multi-Agent Systems [9.34019956999278]
  Building robust multi-agent systems requires engineering discipline focused on architecture to manage complexity under uncertainty.<n>This paper introduces emphLoosely-Structured Software (LSS), a new class of software systems that shifts the engineering focus from constructing deterministic logic to managing the runtime entropy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-16T02:07:34Z)
• AgentOS: From Application Silos to a Natural Language-Driven Data Ecosystem [39.8098595660156]
  This paper proposes a new paradigm: a Personal Agent Operating System (AgentOS)<n>In AgentOS, traditional GUI desktops are replaced by a Natural User Interface (NUI) centered on a unified natural language or voice portal.<n>The system core becomes an Agent Kernel that interprets user intent, decomposes tasks, and coordinates multiple agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-09T21:13:52Z)
• The Auton Agentic AI Framework [5.410458076724158]
  The field of Artificial Intelligence is undergoing a transition from Generative AI to Agentic AI.<n>This transition exposes a fundamental architectural mismatch: Large Language Models (LLMs) produce unstructured outputs, whereas the backend infrastructure they must control requires deterministic, schema-conformant inputs.<n>The present paper describes the Auton Agentic AI Framework, a principled architecture for the creation, creation, and governance of autonomous agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T06:42:08Z)
• From Prompt-Response to Goal-Directed Systems: The Evolution of Agentic AI Software Architecture [0.0]
  Agentic AI denotes an architectural transition from stateless, prompt-driven generative models toward goal-directed systems.<n>This paper examines this transition by connecting intelligent agent theories, with contemporary LLM-centric approaches.<n>The study identifies a convergence toward standardized agent loops, registries, and auditable control mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T03:34:48Z)
• Agentic Artificial Intelligence (AI): Architectures, Taxonomies, and Evaluation of Large Language Model Agents [14.448267395835721]
  We propose a unified taxonomy that breaks agents into Perception, Brain, Planning, Action, Tool Use, and Collaboration.<n>We also group the environments in which these agents operate, including digital operating systems, embodied robotics, and other specialized domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-18T19:51:16Z)
• Adaptation of Agentic AI [162.63072848575695]
  We unify the rapidly expanding research landscape into a systematic framework that spans both agent adaptations and tool adaptations.<n>We demonstrate that this framework helps clarify the design space of adaptation strategies in agentic AI.<n>We then review the representative approaches in each category, analyze their strengths and limitations, and highlight key open challenges and future opportunities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-18T08:38:51Z)
• Agentic AI for Mobile Network RAN Management and Optimization [0.0]
  Agentic AI represents a new paradigm for automating complex systems by using Large AI Models (LAMs)<n>This paper contributes to ongoing research on Agentic AI in 5G and 6G networks by tracing its evolution from classical agents to Agentic AI.<n>Core design patterns-reflection, planning, tool use, and multi-agent collaboration-are then described to illustrate how intelligent behaviors are orchestrated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-04T12:34:57Z)
• Agentsway -- Software Development Methodology for AI Agents-based Teams [4.226647687395254]
  "Agentsway" is a novel software development framework designed for ecosystems where AI agents operate as first-class collaborators.<n>The framework defines distinct roles for planning, prompting, coding, testing, and fine-tuning agents.<n>Agentsway represents a foundational step toward the next generation of AI-native, self-improving software development methodologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-26T11:58:42Z)
• From Agentification to Self-Evolving Agentic AI for Wireless Networks: Concepts, Approaches, and Future Research Directions [70.72279728350763]
  Self-evolving agentic artificial intelligence (AI) offers a new paradigm for future wireless systems.<n>Unlike static AI models, self-evolving agents embed an autonomous evolution cycle that updates models, tools, and in response to environmental dynamics.<n>This paper presents a comprehensive overview of self-evolving agentic AI, highlighting its layered architecture, life cycle, and key techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T05:45:25Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey of Self-Evolving AI Agents: A New Paradigm Bridging Foundation Models and Lifelong Agentic Systems [53.37728204835912]
  Most existing AI systems rely on manually crafted configurations that remain static after deployment.<n>Recent research has explored agent evolution techniques that aim to automatically enhance agent systems based on interaction data and environmental feedback.<n>This survey aims to provide researchers and practitioners with a systematic understanding of self-evolving AI agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-10T16:07:32Z)
• Agentic Web: Weaving the Next Web with AI Agents [109.13815627467514]
  The emergence of AI agents powered by large language models (LLMs) marks a pivotal shift toward the Agentic Web.<n>In this paradigm, agents interact directly with one another to plan, coordinate, and execute complex tasks on behalf of users.<n>We present a structured framework for understanding and building the Agentic Web.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T17:58:12Z)
• Autonomous Deep Agent [0.7489814067742621]
  Deep Agent is an advanced autonomous AI system designed to manage complex multi-phase tasks.<n>The system's foundation is built on our Hierarchical Task DAG framework.<n>Deep Agent establishes a novel paradigm in self-governing AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T21:46:54Z)
• Agent-as-a-Judge: Evaluate Agents with Agents [61.33974108405561]
  We introduce the Agent-as-a-Judge framework, wherein agentic systems are used to evaluate agentic systems. This is an organic extension of the LLM-as-a-Judge framework, incorporating agentic features that enable intermediate feedback for the entire task-solving process. We present DevAI, a new benchmark of 55 realistic automated AI development tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T17:57:02Z)
• Towards an Interface Description Template for AI-enabled Systems [77.34726150561087]
  Reuse is a common system architecture approach that seeks to instantiate a system architecture with existing components. There is currently no framework that guides the selection of necessary information to assess their portability to operate in a system different than the one for which the component was originally purposed. We present ongoing work on establishing an interface description template that captures the main information of an AI-enabled component.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-13T20:30:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.