Model-Agnostic Solutions for Deep Reinforcement Learning in Non-Ergodic Contexts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.08726v1
• Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 16:53:40 GMT
• Title: Model-Agnostic Solutions for Deep Reinforcement Learning in Non-Ergodic Contexts
• Authors: Bert Verbruggen, Arne Vanhoyweghen, Vincent Ginis,
• Abstract summary: Reinforcement Learning (RL) remains a central optimisation framework in machine learning.<n>Bellman equation, central to most RL algorithms, is formulated in terms of expected values of future rewards.<n>In non-ergodic environments, the ensemble average diverges from the time-average growth experienced by individual agents.
• Score: 3.5577285720638194
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement Learning (RL) remains a central optimisation framework in machine learning. Although RL agents can converge to optimal solutions, the definition of ``optimality'' depends on the environment's statistical properties. The Bellman equation, central to most RL algorithms, is formulated in terms of expected values of future rewards. However, when ergodicity is broken, long-term outcomes depend on the specific trajectory rather than on the ensemble average. In such settings, the ensemble average diverges from the time-average growth experienced by individual agents, with expected-value formulations yielding systematically suboptimal policies. Prior studies demonstrated that traditional RL architectures fail to recover the true optimum in non-ergodic environments. We extend this analysis to deep RL implementations and show that these, too, produce suboptimal policies under non-ergodic dynamics. Introducing explicit time dependence into the learning process can correct this limitation. By allowing the network's function approximation to incorporate temporal information, the agent can estimate value functions consistent with the process's intrinsic growth rate. This improvement does not require altering the environmental feedback, such as reward transformations or modified objective functions, but arises naturally from the agent's exposure to temporal trajectories. Our results contribute to the growing body of research on reinforcement learning methods for non-ergodic systems.

Related papers

• ADORA: Training Reasoning Models with Dynamic Advantage Estimation on Reinforcement Learning [32.8666744273094]
  We introduce textbfADORA (textbfAdvantage textbfDynamics via textbfOnline textbfRollout textbfAdaptation), a novel framework for policy optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T17:40:39Z)
• In-Context Reinforcement Learning through Bayesian Fusion of Context and Value Prior [53.21550098214227]
  In-context reinforcement learning promises fast adaptation to unseen environments without parameter updates.<n>We introduce SPICE, a Bayesian ICRL method that learns a prior over Q-values via deep ensemble and updates this prior at test-time.<n>We prove that SPICE achieves regret-optimal behaviour in both bandits and finite-horizon MDPs, even when pretrained only on suboptimal trajectories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T13:41:31Z)
• Interpretable Hybrid Deep Q-Learning Framework for IoT-Based Food Spoilage Prediction with Synthetic Data Generation and Hardware Validation [0.5417521241272645]
  The need for an intelligent, real-time spoilage prediction system has become critical in modern IoT-driven food supply chains.<n>We propose a hybrid reinforcement learning framework integrating Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) for enhanced spoilage prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T12:59:48Z)
• OBLR-PO: A Theoretical Framework for Stable Reinforcement Learning [12.77713716713937]
  We provide a unified theoretical framework that characterizes the statistical properties of commonly used policy-gradient estimators.<n>We derive an adaptive learning-rate schedule governed by the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of gradients.<n>We further show that the variance-optimal baseline is a gradient-weighted estimator, offering a new principle for variance reduction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-28T16:09:28Z)
• Stabilizing Policy Gradients for Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning in LLM Reasoning [77.92320830700797]
  Reinforcement Learning has played a central role in enabling reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models.<n>We propose a tractable computational framework that tracks and leverages curvature information during policy updates.<n>The algorithm, Curvature-Aware Policy Optimization (CAPO), identifies samples that contribute to unstable updates and masks them out.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-01T12:29:32Z)
• Agentic Reinforced Policy Optimization [66.96989268893932]
  Large-scale reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has demonstrated its effectiveness in harnessing the potential of large language models (LLMs) for single-turn reasoning tasks.<n>Current RL algorithms inadequately balance the models' intrinsic long-horizon reasoning capabilities and their proficiency in multi-turn tool interactions.<n>We propose Agentic Reinforced Policy Optimization (ARPO), a novel agentic RL algorithm tailored for training multi-turn LLM-based agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-26T07:53:11Z)
• Optimizers Qualitatively Alter Solutions And We Should Leverage This [62.662640460717476]
  Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) can not guarantee convergence to a unique global minimum of the loss when using only local information, such as SGD.<n>We argue that the community should aim at understanding the biases of already existing methods, as well as aim to build new DNNs with the explicit intent of inducing certain properties of the solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-16T13:33:31Z)
• Truncating Trajectories in Monte Carlo Policy Evaluation: an Adaptive Approach [51.76826149868971]
  Policy evaluation via Monte Carlo simulation is at the core of many MC Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms. We propose as a quality index a surrogate of the mean squared error of a return estimator that uses trajectories of different lengths. We present an adaptive algorithm called Robust and Iterative Data collection strategy Optimization (RIDO)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T11:47:56Z)
• Reinforcement learning with non-ergodic reward increments: robustness via ergodicity transformations [8.44491527275706]
  Application areas for reinforcement learning include autonomous driving, precision agriculture, and finance.<n>In particular, the focus of RL is typically on the expected value of the return.<n>We develop an algorithm that lets RL agents optimize the long-term performance of individual trajectories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T15:13:33Z)
• Assessment of Reinforcement Learning Algorithms for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Optimization [0.0]
  This work presents a first-of-a-kind approach to utilize deep RL to solve the loading pattern problem and could be leveraged for any engineering design optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-09T23:51:24Z)
• Learning to Optimize for Reinforcement Learning [58.01132862590378]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) is essentially different from supervised learning, and in practice, these learneds do not work well even in simple RL tasks. Agent-gradient distribution is non-independent and identically distributed, leading to inefficient meta-training. We show that, although only trained in toy tasks, our learned can generalize unseen complex tasks in Brax.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-03T00:11:02Z)
• Dynamic Federated Learning [57.14673504239551]
  Federated learning has emerged as an umbrella term for centralized coordination strategies in multi-agent environments. We consider a federated learning model where at every iteration, a random subset of available agents perform local updates based on their data. Under a non-stationary random walk model on the true minimizer for the aggregate optimization problem, we establish that the performance of the architecture is determined by three factors, namely, the data variability at each agent, the model variability across all agents, and a tracking term that is inversely proportional to the learning rate of the algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-20T15:00:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.