Navigating Ideation Space: Decomposed Conceptual Representations for Positioning Scientific Ideas
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.08901v1
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 18:56:11 GMT
- Title: Navigating Ideation Space: Decomposed Conceptual Representations for Positioning Scientific Ideas
- Authors: Yuexi Shen, Minqian Liu, Dawei Zhou, Lifu Huang,
- Abstract summary: New ideas need to be situated within an ever-expanding landscape of existing knowledge.<n>Current embedding approaches conflate distinct conceptual aspects into single representations.<n>We introduce the Ideation Space, a structured representation that decomposes scientific knowledge into three distinct dimensions.
- Score: 35.25560221100292
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Scientific discovery is a cumulative process and requires new ideas to be situated within an ever-expanding landscape of existing knowledge. An emerging and critical challenge is how to identify conceptually relevant prior work from rapidly growing literature, and assess how a new idea differentiates from existing research. Current embedding approaches typically conflate distinct conceptual aspects into single representations and cannot support fine-grained literature retrieval; meanwhile, LLM-based evaluators are subject to sycophancy biases, failing to provide discriminative novelty assessment. To tackle these challenges, we introduce the Ideation Space, a structured representation that decomposes scientific knowledge into three distinct dimensions, i.e., research problem, methodology, and core findings, each learned through contrastive training. This framework enables principled measurement of conceptual distance between ideas, and modeling of ideation transitions that capture the logical connections within a proposed idea. Building upon this representation, we propose a Hierarchical Sub-Space Retrieval framework for efficient, targeted literature retrieval, and a Decomposed Novelty Assessment algorithm that identifies which aspects of an idea are novel. Extensive experiments demonstrate substantial improvements, where our approach achieves Recall@30 of 0.329 (16.7% over baselines), our ideation transition retrieval reaches Hit Rate@30 of 0.643, and novelty assessment attains 0.37 correlation with expert judgments. In summary, our work provides a promising paradigm for future research on accelerating and evaluating scientific discovery.
Related papers
- InnoEval: On Research Idea Evaluation as a Knowledge-Grounded, Multi-Perspective Reasoning Problem [87.30601926271864]
InnoEval is a deep innovation evaluation framework designed to emulate human-level idea assessment.<n>We apply a heterogeneous deep knowledge search engine that retrieves and grounds dynamic evidence from diverse online sources.<n>We construct comprehensive datasets derived from authoritative peer-reviewed submissions to benchmark InnoEval.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-16T00:40:31Z) - Deep Ideation: Designing LLM Agents to Generate Novel Research Ideas on Scientific Concept Network [9.317340414316446]
We propose a framework to integrate a scientific network that captures keyword co-occurrence and contextual relationships.<n>A critic engine, trained on real-world reviewer feedback, guides the process by providing continuous feedback on the novelty and feasibility of ideas.<n>Our approach improves the quality of generated ideas by 10.67% compared to other methods, with ideas surpassing top conference acceptance levels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-04T04:00:20Z) - Literature-Grounded Novelty Assessment of Scientific Ideas [23.481266336046833]
We propose the Idea Novelty Checker, an LLM-based retrieval-augmented generation framework.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that our novelty checker achieves approximately 13% higher agreement than existing approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-27T08:47:28Z) - Harnessing Large Language Models for Scientific Novelty Detection [49.10608128661251]
We propose to harness large language models (LLMs) for scientific novelty detection (ND)<n>To capture idea conception, we propose to train a lightweight retriever by distilling the idea-level knowledge from LLMs.<n> Experiments show our method consistently outperforms others on the proposed benchmark datasets for idea retrieval and ND tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-30T14:08:13Z) - IdeaSynth: Iterative Research Idea Development Through Evolving and Composing Idea Facets with Literature-Grounded Feedback [26.860080743555283]
Idea Synth is a research idea development system that uses literature-grounded feedback for articulating research problems, solutions, evaluations and contributions.<n>Our lab study (N) showed that participants, while using Idea Synth, explored more alternative ideas and expanded initial ideas with more details compared to a strong LLM-based baseline.<n>Our deployment study (N=7) demonstrated that participants effectively used Idea Synth for real-world research projects at various stages from developing initial ideas to revising framings of mature manuscripts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-05T04:06:07Z) - Good Idea or Not, Representation of LLM Could Tell [86.36317971482755]
We focus on idea assessment, which aims to leverage the knowledge of large language models to assess the merit of scientific ideas.
We release a benchmark dataset from nearly four thousand manuscript papers with full texts, meticulously designed to train and evaluate the performance of different approaches to this task.
Our findings suggest that the representations of large language models hold more potential in quantifying the value of ideas than their generative outputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-07T02:07:22Z) - On the Role of Entity and Event Level Conceptualization in Generalizable Reasoning: A Survey of Tasks, Methods, Applications, and Future Directions [62.06913340614293]
This paper proposes a categorization of different types of conceptualizations into four levels based on the types of instances being conceptualized.<n>We present the first comprehensive survey of over 150 papers, surveying various definitions, resources, methods, and downstream applications related to conceptualization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-16T10:32:41Z) - Exploring and Verbalizing Academic Ideas by Concept Co-occurrence [42.16213986603552]
This study devises a framework based on concept co-occurrence for academic idea inspiration.
We construct evolving concept graphs according to the co-occurrence relationship of concepts from 20 disciplines or topics.
We generate a description of an idea based on a new data structure called co-occurrence citation quintuple.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-04T07:01:30Z) - SciMON: Scientific Inspiration Machines Optimized for Novelty [68.46036589035539]
We explore and enhance the ability of neural language models to generate novel scientific directions grounded in literature.
We take a dramatic departure with a novel setting in which models use as input background contexts.
We present SciMON, a modeling framework that uses retrieval of "inspirations" from past scientific papers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-23T17:12:08Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.