CaMeLs Can Use Computers Too: System-level Security for Computer Use Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.09923v1
• Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 23:06:35 GMT
• Title: CaMeLs Can Use Computers Too: System-level Security for Computer Use Agents
• Authors: Hanna Foerster, Robert Mullins, Tom Blanchard, Nicolas Papernot, Kristina Nikolić, Florian Tramèr, Ilia Shumailov, Cheng Zhang, Yiren Zhao,
• Abstract summary: AI agents are vulnerable to prompt injection attacks, where malicious content hijacks agent behavior to steal credentials or cause financial loss.<n>We introduce Single-Shot Planning for CUAs, where a trusted planner generates a complete execution graph with conditional branches before any observation of potentially malicious content.<n>Although this architectural isolation successfully prevents instruction injections, we show that additional measures are needed to prevent Branch Steering attacks.
• Score: 60.98294016925157
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: AI agents are vulnerable to prompt injection attacks, where malicious content hijacks agent behavior to steal credentials or cause financial loss. The only known robust defense is architectural isolation that strictly separates trusted task planning from untrusted environment observations. However, applying this design to Computer Use Agents (CUAs) -- systems that automate tasks by viewing screens and executing actions -- presents a fundamental challenge: current agents require continuous observation of UI state to determine each action, conflicting with the isolation required for security. We resolve this tension by demonstrating that UI workflows, while dynamic, are structurally predictable. We introduce Single-Shot Planning for CUAs, where a trusted planner generates a complete execution graph with conditional branches before any observation of potentially malicious content, providing provable control flow integrity guarantees against arbitrary instruction injections. Although this architectural isolation successfully prevents instruction injections, we show that additional measures are needed to prevent Branch Steering attacks, which manipulate UI elements to trigger unintended valid paths within the plan. We evaluate our design on OSWorld, and retain up to 57% of the performance of frontier models while improving performance for smaller open-source models by up to 19%, demonstrating that rigorous security and utility can coexist in CUAs.

Related papers

• LPS-Bench: Benchmarking Safety Awareness of Computer-Use Agents in Long-Horizon Planning under Benign and Adversarial Scenarios [51.52395368061729]
  We present LPS-Bench, a benchmark that evaluates the planning-time safety awareness of MCP-based CUAs under long-horizon tasks.<n> Experiments reveal substantial deficiencies in existing CUAs' ability to maintain safe behavior.<n>We propose mitigation strategies to improve long-horizon planning safety in MCP-based CUA systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T08:40:24Z)
• MirrorGuard: Toward Secure Computer-Use Agents via Simulation-to-Real Reasoning Correction [16.58862217164395]
  We present MirrorGuard, a plug-and-play defense framework that uses simulation-based training to improve CUA security in the real world.<n>MirrorGuard learns to intercept and rectify insecure reasoning chains of CUAs before they produce and execute unsafe actions.<n>Our work proves that simulation-derived defenses can provide robust, real-world protection while maintaining the fundamental utility of the agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T08:32:09Z)
• ReasAlign: Reasoning Enhanced Safety Alignment against Prompt Injection Attack [52.17935054046577]
  We present ReasAlign, a model-level solution to improve safety alignment against indirect prompt injection attacks.<n>ReasAlign incorporates structured reasoning steps to analyze user queries, detect conflicting instructions, and preserve the continuity of the user's intended tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-15T08:23:38Z)
• Towards Verifiably Safe Tool Use for LLM Agents [53.55621104327779]
  Large language model (LLM)-based AI agents extend capabilities by enabling access to tools such as data sources, APIs, search engines, code sandboxes, and even other agents.<n>LLMs may invoke unintended tool interactions and introduce risks, such as leaking sensitive data or overwriting critical records.<n>Current approaches to mitigate these risks, such as model-based safeguards, enhance agents' reliability but cannot guarantee system safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T21:31:38Z)
• Cognitive Control Architecture (CCA): A Lifecycle Supervision Framework for Robustly Aligned AI Agents [1.014002853673217]
  LLM agents are vulnerable to Indirect Prompt Injection (IPI) attacks.<n>IPI attacks hijack agent behavior by polluting external information sources.<n>We propose the Cognitive Control Architecture (CCA), a holistic framework achieving full-lifecycle cognitive supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-07T08:11:19Z)
• Indirect Prompt Injections: Are Firewalls All You Need, or Stronger Benchmarks? [58.48689960350828]
  We show that a simple, modular and model-agnostic defense operating at the agent--tool interface achieves perfect security with high utility.<n>We employ a defense based on two firewalls: a Tool-Input Firewall (Minimizer) and a Tool-Output Firewall (Sanitizer)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T18:09:02Z)
• IPIGuard: A Novel Tool Dependency Graph-Based Defense Against Indirect Prompt Injection in LLM Agents [33.775221377823925]
  Large language model (LLM) agents are widely deployed in real-world applications, where they leverage tools to retrieve and manipulate external data for complex tasks.<n>When interacting with untrusted data sources, tool responses may contain injected instructions that covertly influence agent behaviors and lead to malicious outcomes.<n>We propose a novel defensive task execution paradigm, called IPIGuard, to prevent malicious tool invocations at the source.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-21T07:08:16Z)
• A Systematization of Security Vulnerabilities in Computer Use Agents [1.3560089220432787]
  We conduct a systematic threat analysis and testing of real-world CUAs under adversarial conditions.<n>We identify seven classes of risks unique to the CUA paradigm, and analyze three concrete exploit scenarios in depth.<n>These case studies reveal deeper architectural flaws across current CUA implementations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T19:50:21Z)
• DRIFT: Dynamic Rule-Based Defense with Injection Isolation for Securing LLM Agents [52.92354372596197]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly central to agentic systems due to their strong reasoning and planning capabilities.<n>This interaction also introduces the risk of prompt injection attacks, where malicious inputs from external sources can mislead the agent's behavior.<n>We propose a Dynamic Rule-based Isolation Framework for Trustworthy agentic systems, which enforces both control and data-level constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-13T05:01:09Z)
• Safe RAN control: A Symbolic Reinforcement Learning Approach [62.997667081978825]
  We present a Symbolic Reinforcement Learning (SRL) based architecture for safety control of Radio Access Network (RAN) applications. We provide a purely automated procedure in which a user can specify high-level logical safety specifications for a given cellular network topology. We introduce a user interface (UI) developed to help a user set intent specifications to the system, and inspect the difference in agent proposed actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T16:45:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.