SecMLOps: A Comprehensive Framework for Integrating Security Throughout the MLOps Lifecycle

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.10848v1
• Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 20:28:48 GMT
• Title: SecMLOps: A Comprehensive Framework for Integrating Security Throughout the MLOps Lifecycle
• Authors: Xinrui Zhang, Pincan Zhao, Jason Jaskolka, Heng Li, Rongxing Lu,
• Abstract summary: This paper builds upon the concept of Secure Machine Learning Operations (SecMLOps)<n>SecMLOps builds on the principles of MLOps by embedding security considerations from the initial design phase through to deployment and continuous monitoring.<n>A detailed advanced pedestrian detection system (PDS) use case demonstrates the practical application of SecMLOps.
• Score: 26.00890153767978
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Machine Learning (ML) has emerged as a pivotal technology in the operation of large and complex systems, driving advancements in fields such as autonomous vehicles, healthcare diagnostics, and financial fraud detection. Despite its benefits, the deployment of ML models brings significant security challenges, such as adversarial attacks, which can compromise the integrity and reliability of these systems. To address these challenges, this paper builds upon the concept of Secure Machine Learning Operations (SecMLOps), providing a comprehensive framework designed to integrate robust security measures throughout the entire ML operations (MLOps) lifecycle. SecMLOps builds on the principles of MLOps by embedding security considerations from the initial design phase through to deployment and continuous monitoring. This framework is particularly focused on safeguarding against sophisticated attacks that target various stages of the MLOps lifecycle, thereby enhancing the resilience and trustworthiness of ML applications. A detailed advanced pedestrian detection system (PDS) use case demonstrates the practical application of SecMLOps in securing critical MLOps. Through extensive empirical evaluations, we highlight the trade-offs between security measures and system performance, providing critical insights into optimizing security without unduly impacting operational efficiency. Our findings underscore the importance of a balanced approach, offering valuable guidance for practitioners on how to achieve an optimal balance between security and performance in ML deployments across various domains.

Related papers

• LLM-enabled Applications Require System-Level Threat Monitoring [20.858252815075726]
  We argue that risks should be treated as expected operational conditions rather than exceptional events.<n>The primary barrier to trustworthy deployment is not further improving model capability but establishing system-level threat monitoring mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T13:48:36Z)
• PRM-Free Security Alignment of Large Models via Red Teaming and Adversarial Training [0.5439020425819]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across diverse applications, yet they pose significant security risks that threaten their safe deployment in critical domains.<n>This paper presents a novel PRM-free security alignment framework that leverages automated red teaming and adversarial training to achieve robust security guarantees while maintaining computational efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-14T17:41:12Z)
• Assuring the Safety of Reinforcement Learning Components: AMLAS-RL [3.892872471787381]
  We adapt AMLAS to provide a framework for generating assurance arguments for an RL-enabled system.<n>We demonstrate AMLAS-RL using a running example of a wheeled vehicle tasked with reaching a target goal without collision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-08T15:01:51Z)
• Enhancing Robustness of LLM-Driven Multi-Agent Systems through Randomized Smoothing [13.997409139696556]
  This paper presents a framework for enhancing the safety of large language model (LLM) empowered multi-agent systems (MAS) in safety-critical domains such as aerospace.<n>We apply randomized smoothing, a statistical robustness certification technique, to the MAS consensus context, enabling probabilistic guarantees on agent decisions under adversarial influence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-05T17:26:08Z)
• AGENTSAFE: Benchmarking the Safety of Embodied Agents on Hazardous Instructions [64.85086226439954]
  We present SAFE, a benchmark for assessing the safety of embodied VLM agents on hazardous instructions.<n> SAFE comprises three components: SAFE-THOR, SAFE-VERSE, and SAFE-DIAGNOSE.<n>We uncover systematic failures in translating hazard recognition into safe planning and execution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T16:37:35Z)
• LLM Agents Should Employ Security Principles [60.03651084139836]
  This paper argues that the well-established design principles in information security should be employed when deploying Large Language Model (LLM) agents at scale.<n>We introduce AgentSandbox, a conceptual framework embedding these security principles to provide safeguards throughout an agent's life-cycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T21:39:08Z)
• MCIP: Protecting MCP Safety via Model Contextual Integrity Protocol [47.98229326363512]
  This paper proposes a novel framework to enhance Model Context Protocol safety.<n>Based on the MAESTRO framework, we first analyze the missing safety mechanisms in MCP.<n>Next, we develop a fine-grained taxonomy that captures a diverse range of unsafe behaviors observed in MCP scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T16:41:45Z)
• From Texts to Shields: Convergence of Large Language Models and Cybersecurity [15.480598518857695]
  This report explores the convergence of large language models (LLMs) and cybersecurity.<n>It examines emerging applications of LLMs in software and network security, 5G vulnerability analysis, and generative security engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-01T20:01:07Z)
• Activation Approximations Can Incur Safety Vulnerabilities Even in Aligned LLMs: Comprehensive Analysis and Defense [44.01174462291761]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have showcased remarkable capabilities across various domains.<n>Despite achieving substantial speedups with minimal impact on utility, the safety implications of activation approximations remain unclear.<n>We propose QuadA, a novel safety enhancement method tailored to mitigate the safety compromises introduced by activation approximations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-02T16:25:48Z)
• Global Challenge for Safe and Secure LLMs Track 1 [57.08717321907755]
  The Global Challenge for Safe and Secure Large Language Models (LLMs) is a pioneering initiative organized by AI Singapore (AISG) and the CyberSG R&D Programme Office (CRPO) This paper introduces the Global Challenge for Safe and Secure Large Language Models (LLMs), a pioneering initiative organized by AI Singapore (AISG) and the CyberSG R&D Programme Office (CRPO) to foster the development of advanced defense mechanisms against automated jailbreaking attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T08:20:31Z)
• SoK: The Security-Safety Continuum of Multimodal Foundation Models through Information Flow and Game-Theoretic Defenses [58.93030774141753]
  Multimodal foundation models (MFMs) integrate diverse data modalities to support complex and wide-ranging tasks.<n>In this paper, we unify the concepts of safety and security in the context of MFMs by identifying critical threats that arise from both model behavior and system-level interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-17T23:06:20Z)
• Empowering Autonomous Driving with Large Language Models: A Safety Perspective [82.90376711290808]
  This paper explores the integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into Autonomous Driving systems. LLMs are intelligent decision-makers in behavioral planning, augmented with a safety verifier shield for contextual safety learning. We present two key studies in a simulated environment: an adaptive LLM-conditioned Model Predictive Control (MPC) and an LLM-enabled interactive behavior planning scheme with a state machine.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T03:13:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.