Enhancing the QA Model through a Multi-domain Debiasing Framework

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.11581v1
• Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2026 08:39:07 GMT
• Title: Enhancing the QA Model through a Multi-domain Debiasing Framework
• Authors: Yuefeng Wang, ChangJae Lee,
• Abstract summary: This study evaluates the ELECTRA-small model on the Stanford Question Answering dataset (SQuAD) v1.1 and adversarial datasets AddSent and AddOneSent.<n>We develop a multi-domain debiasing framework incorporating knowledge distillation, debiasing techniques, and domain expansion.
• Score: 1.7802147489386633
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Question-answering (QA) models have advanced significantly in machine reading comprehension but often exhibit biases that hinder their performance, particularly with complex queries in adversarial conditions. This study evaluates the ELECTRA-small model on the Stanford Question Answering Dataset (SQuAD) v1.1 and adversarial datasets AddSent and AddOneSent. By identifying errors related to lexical bias, numerical reasoning, and entity recognition, we develop a multi-domain debiasing framework incorporating knowledge distillation, debiasing techniques, and domain expansion. Our results demonstrate up to 2.6 percentage point improvements in Exact Match (EM) and F1 scores across all test sets, with gains in adversarial contexts. These findings highlight the potential of targeted bias mitigation strategies to enhance the robustness and reliability of natural language understanding systems.

Related papers

• AdversaRiskQA: An Adversarial Factuality Benchmark for High-Risk Domains [3.721111684544962]
  Hallucination in large language models (LLMs) contributes to spread of misinformation and diminished public trust.<n>We introduce AdversaRiskQA, the first verified and reliable benchmark systematically evaluating adversarial factuality.<n>We evaluate six open- and closed-source LLMs from the Qwen, GPT-OSS, and GPT families, measuring misinformation detection rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T22:47:59Z)
• Adversarial Question Answering Robustness: A Multi-Level Error Analysis and Mitigation Study [0.0]
  Question answering (QA) systems achieve impressive performance on standard benchmarks like SQuAD, but remain vulnerable to adversarial examples.<n>This project investigates the adversarial robustness of transformer models on the AddSent adversarial dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T04:20:33Z)
• A Multimodal XAI Framework for Trustworthy CNNs and Bias Detection in Deep Representation Learning [0.0]
  We propose a novel framework that unifies attention-augmented feature fusion, Grad-CAM++-based local explanations, and a Reveal-to-Revise feedback loop for bias detection and mitigation.<n>Our approach achieves 93.2% classification accuracy, 91.6% F1-score, and 78.1% explanation fidelity (IoU-XAI)<n>Our work bridges the gap between performance, transparency, and fairness, highlighting a practical pathway for trustworthy AI in sensitive domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T20:06:09Z)
• Curse of Knowledge: When Complex Evaluation Context Benefits yet Biases LLM Judges [72.3356133063925]
  The paradigm of large language models (LLMs) as judges has emerged as a scalable solution, yet prior work primarily focuses on simple settings.<n>Our in-depth analysis offers crucial insights for improving the accuracy and verifiability of evaluation signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-03T15:48:33Z)
• MAB Optimizer for Estimating Math Question Difficulty via Inverse CV without NLP [3.9566483499208633]
  This study introduces the Approach of Passive Measures among Educands (APME), a reinforcement learning-based Multi-Armed Bandit (MAB) framework.<n>By leveraging the inverse coefficient of variation as a risk-adjusted metric, the model provides an explainable and scalable mechanism for adaptive assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-26T13:23:31Z)
• Fair Deepfake Detectors Can Generalize [51.21167546843708]
  We show that controlling for confounders (data distribution and model capacity) enables improved generalization via fairness interventions.<n>Motivated by this insight, we propose Demographic Attribute-insensitive Intervention Detection (DAID), a plug-and-play framework composed of: i) Demographic-aware data rebalancing, which employs inverse-propensity weighting and subgroup-wise feature normalization to neutralize distributional biases; and ii) Demographic-agnostic feature aggregation, which uses a novel alignment loss to suppress sensitive-attribute signals.<n>DAID consistently achieves superior performance in both fairness and generalization compared to several state-of-the-art
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-03T14:10:02Z)
• Preserving Knowledge Invariance: Rethinking Robustness Evaluation of Open Information Extraction [49.15931834209624]
  We present the first benchmark that simulates the evaluation of open information extraction models in the real world.<n>We design and annotate a large-scale testbed in which each example is a knowledge-invariant clique.<n>By further elaborating the robustness metric, a model is judged to be robust if its performance is consistently accurate on the overall cliques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T12:05:09Z)
• On the Robustness of Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis: Rethinking Model, Data, and Training [109.9218185711916]
  Aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA) aims at automatically inferring the specific sentiment polarities toward certain aspects of products or services behind social media texts or reviews. We propose to enhance the ABSA robustness by systematically rethinking the bottlenecks from all possible angles, including model, data, and training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T11:07:43Z)
• Delving into Identify-Emphasize Paradigm for Combating Unknown Bias [52.76758938921129]
  We propose an effective bias-conflicting scoring method (ECS) to boost the identification accuracy. We also propose gradient alignment (GA) to balance the contributions of the mined bias-aligned and bias-conflicting samples. Experiments are conducted on multiple datasets in various settings, demonstrating that the proposed solution can mitigate the impact of unknown biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-22T14:50:24Z)
• General Greedy De-bias Learning [163.65789778416172]
  We propose a General Greedy De-bias learning framework (GGD), which greedily trains the biased models and the base model like gradient descent in functional space. GGD can learn a more robust base model under the settings of both task-specific biased models with prior knowledge and self-ensemble biased model without prior knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T14:47:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.