CoReflect: Conversational Evaluation via Co-Evolutionary Simulation and Reflective Rubric Refinement
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.12208v1
- Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2026 00:56:06 GMT
- Title: CoReflect: Conversational Evaluation via Co-Evolutionary Simulation and Reflective Rubric Refinement
- Authors: Yunzhe Li, Richie Yueqi Feng, Tianxin Wei, Chin-Chia Hsu,
- Abstract summary: We introduce CoReflect, which unifies dialogue simulation and evaluation into an adaptive, iterative process.<n>A conversation planner generates structured templates to guide a user simulator through diverse, goal-directed dialogues.<n>A reflective analyzer processes these dialogues to identify systematic behavioral patterns and automatically refine the evaluations.
- Score: 9.643727190176943
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Evaluating conversational systems in multi-turn settings remains a fundamental challenge. Conventional pipelines typically rely on manually defined rubrics and fixed conversational context$-$a static approach that limits coverage and fails to capture the diverse, emergent behaviors of dialogue models. To address this, we introduce CoReflect (Conversational Evaluation via Co-Evolutionary Simulation and Reflective Rubric Refinement), which unifies dialogue simulation and evaluation into an adaptive, iterative process. CoReflect employs a conversation planner that generates structured templates to guide a user simulator through diverse, goal-directed dialogues. Subsequently, a reflective analyzer processes these dialogues to identify systematic behavioral patterns and automatically refine the evaluation rubrics. Crucially, the insights from the conversation analysis are fed back into the planner to update conversation templates for subsequent iterations. This co-evolution loop ensures that the complexity of test cases and the diagnostic precision of rubrics improve in tandem. By minimizing human intervention, CoReflect provides a scalable and self-refining methodology that allows evaluation protocols to adapt alongside the rapidly advancing capabilities of dialogue models.
Related papers
- Enhancing Goal-oriented Proactive Dialogue Systems via Consistency Reflection and Correction [14.520176577205754]
We introduce a model-agnostic two-stage Consistency Reflection and Correction framework.<n>In the consistency reflection stage, the model is prompted to reflect on the discrepancies between generated responses and dialogue contexts.<n>In the consistency correction stage, the model generates responses that are more consistent with the dialogue context.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-16T11:15:21Z) - A Multi-view Discourse Framework for Integrating Semantic and Syntactic Features in Dialog Agents [0.0]
Multiturn dialogue models aim to generate human-like responses by leveraging conversational context.<n>Existing methods often neglect the interactions between these utterances or treat all of them as equally significant.<n>This paper introduces a discourse-aware framework for response selection in retrieval-based dialogue systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-12T04:22:18Z) - Full-Duplex-Bench: A Benchmark to Evaluate Full-duplex Spoken Dialogue Models on Turn-taking Capabilities [93.09944267871163]
FullDuplexBench is a benchmark that systematically evaluates key interactive behaviors.<n>By releasing our benchmark code we aim to advance spoken dialogue modeling and the development of more natural and engaging SDMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-06T18:59:16Z) - Learning Locality and Isotropy in Dialogue Modeling [28.743212772593335]
We propose a simple method for dialogue representation calibration, namely SimDRC, to build isotropic and conversational feature spaces.
Experimental results show that our approach significantly outperforms the current state-of-the-art models on three dialogue tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-29T06:48:53Z) - DynaEval: Unifying Turn and Dialogue Level Evaluation [60.66883575106898]
We propose DynaEval, a unified automatic evaluation framework.
It is capable of performing turn-level evaluation, but also holistically considers the quality of the entire dialogue.
Experiments show that DynaEval significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art dialogue coherence model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-02T12:23:18Z) - I like fish, especially dolphins: Addressing Contradictions in Dialogue
Modeling [104.09033240889106]
We introduce the DialoguE COntradiction DEtection task (DECODE) and a new conversational dataset containing both human-human and human-bot contradictory dialogues.
We then compare a structured utterance-based approach of using pre-trained Transformer models for contradiction detection with the typical unstructured approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-24T18:47:49Z) - Learning an Effective Context-Response Matching Model with
Self-Supervised Tasks for Retrieval-based Dialogues [88.73739515457116]
We introduce four self-supervised tasks including next session prediction, utterance restoration, incoherence detection and consistency discrimination.
We jointly train the PLM-based response selection model with these auxiliary tasks in a multi-task manner.
Experiment results indicate that the proposed auxiliary self-supervised tasks bring significant improvement for multi-turn response selection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-14T08:44:46Z) - Controlling Dialogue Generation with Semantic Exemplars [55.460082747572734]
We present an Exemplar-based Dialogue Generation model, EDGE, that uses the semantic frames present in exemplar responses to guide generation.
We show that controlling dialogue generation based on the semantic frames of exemplars, rather than words in the exemplar itself, improves the coherence of generated responses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-20T17:02:37Z) - Dialogue-Based Relation Extraction [53.2896545819799]
We present the first human-annotated dialogue-based relation extraction (RE) dataset DialogRE.
We argue that speaker-related information plays a critical role in the proposed task, based on an analysis of similarities and differences between dialogue-based and traditional RE tasks.
Experimental results demonstrate that a speaker-aware extension on the best-performing model leads to gains in both the standard and conversational evaluation settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-17T03:51:57Z) - An Empirical Investigation of Pre-Trained Transformer Language Models
for Open-Domain Dialogue Generation [23.343006562849126]
We present an empirical investigation of pre-trained Transformer-based auto-regressive language models for the task of open-domain dialogue generation.
Training paradigm of pre-training and fine-tuning is employed to conduct learning.
Experiments are conducted on the typical single-turn and multi-turn dialogue corpora such as Weibo, Douban, Reddit, DailyDialog, and Persona-Chat.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-09T15:20:21Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.