How Clinicians Think and What AI Can Learn From It

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.12547v1
• Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2026 19:19:41 GMT
• Title: How Clinicians Think and What AI Can Learn From It
• Abstract summary: Most clinical AI systems operate as prediction engines -- producing labels or risk scores -- yet real clinical reasoning is a time-bounded, sequential control problem under uncertainty.<n>We argue that the dominant computational substrate of clinician reasoning is not cardinal optimization but ordinal, non-compensatory decision-making.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Most clinical AI systems operate as prediction engines -- producing labels or risk scores -- yet real clinical reasoning is a time-bounded, sequential control problem under uncertainty. Clinicians interleave information gathering with irreversible actions, guided by regret, constraints and patient values. We argue that the dominant computational substrate of clinician reasoning is not cardinal optimization but ordinal, non-compensatory decision-making: Clinicians frequently rely on fast-and-frugal, lexicographic heuristics (e.g., fast-and-frugal trees) that stop early after checking a small, fixed sequence of cues. We provide a normative rationale for why such algorithms are not merely bounded rationality shortcuts, but can be epistemically preferred in medicine. First, many clinical trade-offs are constructed through human judgment and are only weakly measurable on absolute scales; without strong measurement axioms, only orderings are invariant, motivating an ordinal-by-default stance. Second, preference and signal elicitation are structurally crude: The mapping from truth $\to$ perception $\to$ inference $\to$ recorded variables introduces layered noise, leaving a persistent uncertainty floor. When this 'crudeness' overwhelms the decision margin, plug-in expected-utility optimization becomes brittle (high flip probability under small perturbations), whereas robust dominance/filtering rules ($ε$-dominance, maximin) stabilize decisions.Finally, we outline a clinician-aligned AI blueprint: Use rich models for beliefs and trajectories, but choose actions through robust ordinal rules; treat heuristics as the low-dimensional special case; and deploy AI as 'selective complexity' -- invoked mainly for tie-breaking when decisions are fragile and information has positive expected impact.

Related papers

• Rethinking Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: Assumptions, Reality, and Reframing [29.25526289599026]
  We argue that a decade of intense research has not translated into proportionate bedside impact.<n>This Perspective identifies six interconnected dimensions of this misalignment.<n>We propose a vision of agentic, physician-aligned AI that extends, rather than replaces, clinical judgment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-29T19:55:49Z)
• Medical Model Synthesis Architectures: A Case Study [72.46211022258122]
  Current AI systems struggle with calibrated reasoning under uncertainty.<n>We propose a framework for AI systems that can make practically useful but formally transparent clinical predictions under uncertainty.<n>We show how an initial proof-of-concept of this framework can be used for differential diagnosis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-10T19:30:16Z)
• Beyond Prompt: Fine-grained Simulation of Cognitively Impaired Standardized Patients via Stochastic Steering [58.85421622061983]
  We propose StsPatient for the fine-grained simulation of cognitively impaired patients.<n>We capture domain-specific features by extracting steering vectors from contrastive pairs of instructions and responses.<n>StsPatient significantly outperforms baselines in both clinical authenticity and severity controllability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-14T02:37:46Z)
• Bridging AI and Clinical Reasoning: Abductive Explanations for Alignment on Critical Symptoms [5.220940151628734]
  Key challenge is that AI reasoning diverges from structured clinical frameworks.<n>We leverage formal abductive explanations, which offer consistent, guaranteed reasoning.<n>This enables a clear understanding of AI decision-making and allows alignment with clinical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-15T04:27:59Z)
• Beyond Medical Chatbots: Meddollina and the Rise of Continuous Clinical Intelligence [0.0]
  We formalise Clinical Contextual Intelligence (CCI) as a capability class required for real-world clinical use.<n>We introduce Meddollina, a governance-first clinical intelligence system designed to constrain inference before language realisation.<n>We evaluate Meddollina using a behaviour-first regime across 16,412+ heterogeneous medical queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T07:05:14Z)
• An Orthogonal Learner for Individualized Outcomes in Markov Decision Processes [55.93922317950527]
  We develop a novel meta-learner called DRQ-learner.<n>Our DRQ-learner is applicable to settings with both discrete and continuous state spaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T15:49:29Z)
• AT-CXR: Uncertainty-Aware Agentic Triage for Chest X-rays [12.843444405498404]
  We introduce AT-CXR, an uncertainty-aware agent for chest X-rays.<n>The system estimates per-case confidence and distributional fit, then follows a stepwise policy to issue an automated decision.<n>We evaluate two router designs that share the same inputs and actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-26T14:33:09Z)
• SepsisLab: Early Sepsis Prediction with Uncertainty Quantification and Active Sensing [67.8991481023825]
  Sepsis is the leading cause of in-hospital mortality in the USA. Existing predictive models are usually trained on high-quality data with few missing information. For the potential high-risk patients with low confidence due to limited observations, we propose a robust active sensing algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T04:47:36Z)
• Likelihood Ratio Confidence Sets for Sequential Decision Making [51.66638486226482]
  We revisit the likelihood-based inference principle and propose to use likelihood ratios to construct valid confidence sequences. Our method is especially suitable for problems with well-specified likelihoods. We show how to provably choose the best sequence of estimators and shed light on connections to online convex optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-08T00:10:21Z)
• When Does Confidence-Based Cascade Deferral Suffice? [69.28314307469381]
  Cascades are a classical strategy to enable inference cost to vary adaptively across samples. A deferral rule determines whether to invoke the next classifier in the sequence, or to terminate prediction. Despite being oblivious to the structure of the cascade, confidence-based deferral often works remarkably well in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-06T04:13:57Z)
• Pruning the Way to Reliable Policies: A Multi-Objective Deep Q-Learning Approach to Critical Care [46.2482873419289]
  We introduce a deep Q-learning approach to obtain more reliable critical care policies. We evaluate our method in off-policy and offline settings using simulated environments and real health records from intensive care units.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T18:02:57Z)
• Finding Counterfactually Optimal Action Sequences in Continuous State Spaces [22.84932480886562]
  We describe a sequence of discrete actions and continuous states using finite horizon Markov decision processes. We then develop a search method based on the $A*$ continuity of the environment's dynamics. Our method is very efficient in practice, and it has the potential to offer interesting insights for sequential decision making tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T18:00:29Z)
• Simple and Efficient Confidence Score for Grading Whole Slide Images [0.7349727826230862]
  We propose a new score to measure the confidence of AI models in grading tasks. Our confidence score is specifically adapted to ordinal output variables, is versatile and does not require extra training or additional inferences. We show that the score is capable of accurately identifying mispredicted slides and that accuracy for high confidence decisions is significantly higher than for low-confidence decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-08T14:15:43Z)
• Information-Theoretic Safe Exploration with Gaussian Processes [89.31922008981735]
  We consider a sequential decision making task where we are not allowed to evaluate parameters that violate an unknown (safety) constraint. Most current methods rely on a discretization of the domain and cannot be directly extended to the continuous case. We propose an information-theoretic safe exploration criterion that directly exploits the GP posterior to identify the most informative safe parameters to evaluate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-09T15:23:58Z)
• Improving the compromise between accuracy, interpretability and personalization of rule-based machine learning in medical problems [0.08594140167290096]
  We introduce a new component to predict if a given rule will be correct or not for a particular patient, which introduces personalization into the procedure. The validation results using three public clinical datasets show that it also allows to increase the predictive performance of the selected set of rules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-15T01:19:04Z)
• The Medkit-Learn(ing) Environment: Medical Decision Modelling through Simulation [81.72197368690031]
  We present a new benchmarking suite designed specifically for medical sequential decision making. The Medkit-Learn(ing) Environment is a publicly available Python package providing simple and easy access to high-fidelity synthetic medical data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-08T10:38:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.