Persuasion in Online Conversations Is Associated with Alignment in Expressed Human Values

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.12685v1
• Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 03:08:25 GMT
• Title: Persuasion in Online Conversations Is Associated with Alignment in Expressed Human Values
• Authors: Bhavesh Vuyyuru, Farnaz Jahanbakhsh,
• Abstract summary: We investigate how the expression and alignment of human values in back-and-forth online discussions relate to persuasion.<n>Using data from Reddit's ChangeMyView subreddit, we analyze one-on-one exchanges and characterize participants' value expression.
• Score: 3.52359746858894
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Online disagreements often fail to produce understanding, instead reinforcing existing positions or escalating conflict. Prior work on predictors of successful persuasion in online discourse has largely focused on surface features such as linguistic style or conversational structure, leaving open the role of underlying principles or concerns that participants bring to an interaction. In this paper, we investigate how the expression and alignment of human values in back-and-forth online discussions relate to persuasion. Using data from Reddit's ChangeMyView subreddit, where successful persuasion is explicitly signaled through the awarding of deltas, we analyze one-on-one exchanges and characterize participants' value expression by drawing from Schwartz's Refined Theory of Basic Human Values. We find that successful persuasion is associated with two complementary processes: pre-existing compatibility between participants' value priorities even before the exchange happens, and the emergence of value alignment over the course of a conversation. At the same time, successful persuasion does not depend on commenters making large departures from their typical value expression patterns. We discuss implications of our findings for the design of online social platforms that aim to support constructive engagement across disagreement.

Related papers

• MMPersuade: A Dataset and Evaluation Framework for Multimodal Persuasion [73.99171322670772]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) are increasingly deployed in domains such as shopping, health, and news.<n> MMPersuade provides a unified framework for systematically studying multimodal persuasion dynamics in LVLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-26T17:39:21Z)
• Computational Analysis of Conversation Dynamics through Participant Responsivity [18.116125865284666]
  We develop and evaluate methods for quantifying responsivity.<n>We evaluate both methods against a ground truth set of human-annotated conversations.<n>We then develop conversation-level derived metrics to address various aspects of conversational discourse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-19T23:13:13Z)
• Aligning Spoken Dialogue Models from User Interactions [55.192134724622235]
  We propose a novel preference alignment framework to improve spoken dialogue models on realtime conversations from user interactions.<n>We create a dataset of more than 150,000 preference pairs from raw multi-turn speech conversations annotated with AI feedback.<n>Our findings shed light on the importance of a well-calibrated balance among various dynamics, crucial for natural real-time speech dialogue systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-26T16:45:20Z)
• Emergent Influence Networks in Good-Faith Online Discussions [3.678291991600161]
  This study investigates the impact of one's position in the discussion network created via responses to others' arguments on one's persuasiveness in unfacilitated online debates. We propose a novel framework for measuring the impact of network position on persuasiveness using a combination of social network analysis and machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-23T00:24:50Z)
• Persua: A Visual Interactive System to Enhance the Persuasiveness of Arguments in Online Discussion [52.49981085431061]
  Enhancing people's ability to write persuasive arguments could contribute to the effectiveness and civility in online communication. We derived four design goals for a tool that helps users improve the persuasiveness of arguments in online discussions. Persua is an interactive visual system that provides example-based guidance on persuasive strategies to enhance the persuasiveness of arguments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-16T08:07:53Z)
• Who Responded to Whom: The Joint Effects of Latent Topics and Discourse in Conversation Structure [53.77234444565652]
  We identify the responding relations in the conversation discourse, which link response utterances to their initiations. We propose a model to learn latent topics and discourse in word distributions, and predict pairwise initiation-response links. Experimental results on both English and Chinese conversations show that our model significantly outperforms the previous state of the arts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-17T17:46:00Z)
• Keeping Up Appearances: Computational Modeling of Face Acts in Persuasion Oriented Discussions [2.9628298226732612]
  We propose a framework for modeling face acts in persuasion conversations. The framework reveals insights about differences in face act utilization between asymmetric roles in persuasion conversations. Using computational models, we are able to successfully identify face acts as well as predict a key conversational outcome.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-22T21:02:14Z)
• Influence via Ethos: On the Persuasive Power of Reputation in Deliberation Online [10.652828373995513]
  Deliberation among individuals online plays a key role in shaping the opinions that drive votes, purchases, donations and other critical offline behavior. Our research examines the persuasive power of $textitethos$ -- an individual's "reputation" We find that an individual's reputation significantly impacts their persuasion rate above and beyond the validity, strength and presentation of their arguments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-01T04:25:40Z)
• You Impress Me: Dialogue Generation via Mutual Persona Perception [62.89449096369027]
  The research in cognitive science suggests that understanding is an essential signal for a high-quality chit-chat conversation. Motivated by this, we propose P2 Bot, a transmitter-receiver based framework with the aim of explicitly modeling understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-11T12:51:07Z)
• What Changed Your Mind: The Roles of Dynamic Topics and Discourse in Argumentation Process [78.4766663287415]
  This paper presents a study that automatically analyzes the key factors in argument persuasiveness. We propose a novel neural model that is able to track the changes of latent topics and discourse in argumentative conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-10T04:27:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.