The Hidden Toll of Social Media News: Causal Effects on Psychosocial Wellbeing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13487v1
• Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 00:46:51 GMT
• Title: The Hidden Toll of Social Media News: Causal Effects on Psychosocial Wellbeing
• Authors: Olivia Pal, Agam Goyal, Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Koustuv Saha,
• Abstract summary: This study leveraged a large-scale dataset of 26M posts and 45M comments on the BlueSky platform.<n>We examined psychosocial wellbeing, in terms of affective, behavioral, and cognitive outcomes.
• Score: 13.828701779818518
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: News consumption on social media has become ubiquitous, yet how different forms of engagement shape psychosocial outcomes remains unclear. To address this gap, we leveraged a large-scale dataset of ~26M posts and ~45M comments on the BlueSky platform, and conducted a quasi-experimental study, matching 81,345 Treated users exposed to News feeds with 83,711 Control users using stratified propensity score analysis. We examined psychosocial wellbeing, in terms of affective, behavioral, and cognitive outcomes. Our findings reveal that news engagement produces systematic trade-offs: increased depression, stress, and anxiety, yet decreased loneliness and increased social interaction on the platform. Regression models reveal that News feed bookmarking is associated with greater psychosocial deterioration compared to commenting or quoting, with magnitude differences exceeding tenfold. These per-engagement effects accumulate with repeated exposure, showing significant psychosocial impacts. Our work extends theories of news effects beyond crisis-centric frameworks by demonstrating that routine consumption creates distinct psychological dynamics depending on engagement type, and bears implications for tools and interventions for mitigating the psychosocial costs of news consumption on social media.

Related papers

• Mental Health Impacts of AI Companions: Triangulating Social Media Quasi-Experiments, User Perspectives, and Relational Theory [18.716972390545703]
  We examined how engaging with AICCs shaped wellbeing and how users perceived these experiences.<n>Findings revealed mixed effects -- greater affective and grief expression, readability, and interpersonal focus.<n>We offer design implications for AI companions that scaffold healthy boundaries, support mindful engagement, support disclosure without dependency, and surface relationship stages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T15:47:37Z)
• ReDepress: A Cognitive Framework for Detecting Depression Relapse from Social Media [48.56586765769052]
  We present ReDepress, the first clinically validated social media dataset focused on relapse.<n>Our framework draws on cognitive theories of depression, incorporating constructs such as attention bias, interpretation bias, memory bias and rumination.<n>Our findings validate psychological theories in real-world textual data and underscore the potential of cognitive-informed computational methods for early relapse detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-22T16:33:59Z)
• The Psychological Impacts of Algorithmic and AI-Driven Social Media on Teenagers: A Call to Action [0.0]
  This study investigates the meta-issues surrounding social media. Our investigation reveals a paradoxical outcome: rather than fostering closer relationships and improving social lives, the algorithms and structures that underlie social media contribute to a profound psychological impact on individuals. This phenomenon is particularly pronounced among teenagers, who are disproportionately affected by curated online personas, peer pressure to present a perfect digital image, and the constant bombardment of notifications and updates that characterize their social media experience.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T18:49:12Z)
• The Role of Likes: How Online Feedback Impacts Users' Mental Health [1.0156836684627544]
  We analyse the impact of receiving online feedback on users' emotional experience, social connectedness and self-esteem. We find that experiencing little to no reaction from others does not only elicit negative emotions amongst users, but also induces low levels of self-esteem. In contrast, receiving much positive online feedback, evokes feelings of social connectedness and reduces overall loneliness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-19T07:48:10Z)
• Decoding Susceptibility: Modeling Misbelief to Misinformation Through a Computational Approach [61.04606493712002]
  Susceptibility to misinformation describes the degree of belief in unverifiable claims that is not observable. Existing susceptibility studies heavily rely on self-reported beliefs. We propose a computational approach to model users' latent susceptibility levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T07:22:56Z)
• Decoding the Silent Majority: Inducing Belief Augmented Social Graph with Large Language Model for Response Forecasting [74.68371461260946]
  SocialSense is a framework that induces a belief-centered graph on top of an existent social network, along with graph-based propagation to capture social dynamics. Our method surpasses existing state-of-the-art in experimental evaluations for both zero-shot and supervised settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T06:17:02Z)
• Mental Health Coping Stories on Social Media: A Causal-Inference Study of Papageno Effect [8.962128900404554]
  The Papageno effect concerns how media can play a positive role in preventing and mitigating suicidal ideation and behaviors. We study the impact of exposure to mental health coping stories on individuals on Twitter. Our findings reveal that, engaging with coping stories leads to decreased stress and depression, and improved expressive writing, diversity, and interactivity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-20T10:25:28Z)
• Adherence to Misinformation on Social Media Through Socio-Cognitive and Group-Based Processes [79.79659145328856]
  We argue that when misinformation proliferates, this happens because the social media environment enables adherence to misinformation. We make the case that polarization and misinformation adherence are closely tied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T12:34:24Z)
• The world seems different in a social context: a neural network analysis of human experimental data [57.729312306803955]
  We show that it is possible to replicate human behavioral data in both individual and social task settings by modifying the precision of prior and sensory signals. An analysis of the neural activation traces of the trained networks provides evidence that information is coded in fundamentally different ways in the network in the individual and in the social conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T17:19:12Z)
• SSAGCN: Social Soft Attention Graph Convolution Network for Pedestrian Trajectory Prediction [59.064925464991056]
  We propose one new prediction model named Social Soft Attention Graph Convolution Network (SSAGCN) SSAGCN aims to simultaneously handle social interactions among pedestrians and scene interactions between pedestrians and environments. Experiments on public available datasets prove the effectiveness of SSAGCN and have achieved state-of-the-art results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-05T01:49:18Z)
• Conductance and Social Capital: Modeling and Empirically Measuring Online Social Influence [9.556358888163983]
  Social influence pervades our everyday lives and lays the foundation for complex social phenomena. Existing literature studying online social influence suffers from several drawbacks. This work bridges the gap and presents three contributions towards modeling and empirically quantifying online influence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-25T01:05:49Z)
• Causal Understanding of Fake News Dissemination on Social Media [50.4854427067898]
  We argue that it is critical to understand what user attributes potentially cause users to share fake news. In fake news dissemination, confounders can be characterized by fake news sharing behavior that inherently relates to user attributes and online activities. We propose a principled approach to alleviating selection bias in fake news dissemination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T19:37:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.