Practitioner Views on Mobile App Accessibility: Practices and Challenges

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14131v1
• Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 16:30:02 GMT
• Title: Practitioner Views on Mobile App Accessibility: Practices and Challenges
• Authors: Amila Indika, Rick Kazman, Anthony Peruma,
• Abstract summary: This paper presents findings from a mixed-methods survey of 110 mobile app developers across 43 countries.<n>Results show that developers often rely on platform-specific guidelines and typically perform compliance testing late in the development process.<n>We identify novel platform-specific barriers and demonstrate how accessibility practices differ across developer experience levels.
• Score: 6.556262749816148
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As mobile applications (apps) become ubiquitous in everyday life, it is crucial for developers to prioritize accessibility for users with diverse abilities. While previous research has identified widespread accessibility issues and raised awareness of developer challenges, there remains a lack of cross-platform, globally representative insights into how practitioners approach accessibility in practice. This paper presents findings from a mixed-methods survey of 110 mobile app developers across 43 countries, examining how platform ecosystems (iOS vs. Android) and developer experience shape accessibility practices. Results show that while developers recognize the importance of accessibility, they often rely on platform-specific guidelines and typically perform compliance testing late in the development process. Developers primarily implement text-focused features while struggling with API limitations and organizational constraints. Through systematic cross-platform comparison, we identify novel platform-specific barriers and demonstrate how accessibility practices differ across developer experience levels. Our findings offer new insights into the challenges of achieving accessibility in practice and provide actionable steps for various stakeholders to promote more consistent and inclusive app development.

Related papers

• The MUG-10 Framework for Preventing Usability Issues in Mobile Application Development [1.0312968200748116]
  This study aims to provide countermeasures to avoid usability issues in mobile application development.<n>Through a survey of 20 mobile software design and development practitioners, this study aims to fill this research gap.<n>The analysis of the collected material enabled us to develop a novel framework consisting of ten guidelines and three activities with general applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T05:54:48Z)
• Evaluating Cognitive-Behavioral Fixation via Multimodal User Viewing Patterns on Social Media [52.313084466769375]
  We propose a novel framework for assessing cognitive-behavioral fixation by analyzing users' multimodal social media engagement patterns.<n> Experiments on existing benchmarks and a newly curated multimodal dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-05T05:50:00Z)
• Mind the Gap: A Decade-Scale Empirical Study of Multi-Stakeholder Dynamics in VR Ecosystem [8.609024465251874]
  We apply topic modeling and impact analysis to 944,320 user reviews and 389,477 developer posts.<n>Our findings show that while users repeatedly raise such issues, they are rarely discussed in developer forums.<n>These insights enable data-driven recommendations for closing the user-developer gap in VR ecosystems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-23T05:35:12Z)
• WebUIBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models in WebUI-to-Code [57.45181837786448]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have the potential to act as AI software engineers capable of executing complex web application development.<n>Existing benchmarks usually fail to provide an assessment of sub-capabilities and focus solely on webpage generation outcomes.<n>We propose WebUIBench, a benchmark systematically designed to evaluate MLLMs in four key areas: WebUI Perception, HTML Programming,WebUI-HTML Understanding, and WebUI-to-Code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T14:46:02Z)
• Towards User-Focused Cross-Domain Testing: Disentangling Accessibility, Usability, and Fairness [0.0]
  Fairness testing is increasingly recognized as fundamental in software engineering.<n>But its practical integration into software development may pose challenges, given its overlapping boundaries with usability and accessibility testing.<n>This study uses insights from 12 systematic reviews published in the past decade to shed light on the nuanced interactions among fairness, usability, and accessibility testing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-11T03:33:20Z)
• Foundations and Recent Trends in Multimodal Mobile Agents: A Survey [72.29426995154088]
  Mobile agents are essential for automating tasks in complex and dynamic mobile environments.<n>Recent advancements enhance real-time adaptability and multimodal interaction.<n>We categorize these advancements into two main approaches: prompt-based methods and training-based methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T11:50:58Z)
• Exploring Accessibility Trends and Challenges in Mobile App Development: A Study of Stack Overflow Questions [14.005637416640448]
  This study presents a large-scale empirical analysis of accessibility discussions on Stack Overflow to identify the trends and challenges Android and iOS developers face. Our results show several challenges, including integrating assistive technologies like screen readers, ensuring accessible UI design, supporting text-to-speech across languages, and conducting accessibility testing. We envision our findings driving improvements in developer practices, research directions, tool support, and educational resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-12T11:13:24Z)
• A Survey of Neural Code Intelligence: Paradigms, Advances and Beyond [84.95530356322621]
  This survey presents a systematic review of the advancements in code intelligence.<n>It covers over 50 representative models and their variants, more than 20 categories of tasks, and an extensive coverage of over 680 related works.<n>Building on our examination of the developmental trajectories, we further investigate the emerging synergies between code intelligence and broader machine intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T08:54:56Z)
• Integrating Accessibility in a Mobile App Development Course [0.0]
  The course introduced three accessibility-related topics using various interventions: Accessibility Awareness (a guest lecture by a legal expert), Technical Knowledge (lectures on Android accessibility guidelines and testing practices), and Empathy (an activity that required students to blindfold themselves and interact with their phones using a screen-reader) All students could correctly identify at least one accessibility issue in the user interface of a real-world app given its screenshot, and 90% of them could provide a correct solution to fix it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-12T12:44:33Z)
• Federated Learning: A Signal Processing Perspective [144.63726413692876]
  Federated learning is an emerging machine learning paradigm for training models across multiple edge devices holding local datasets, without explicitly exchanging the data. This article provides a unified systematic framework for federated learning in a manner that encapsulates and highlights the main challenges that are natural to treat using signal processing tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-31T15:14:39Z)
• Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities [52.59080024266596]
  We present a survey of the state-of-the-art deep learning methods for sensor-based human activity recognition. We first introduce the multi-modality of the sensory data and provide information for public datasets. We then propose a new taxonomy to structure the deep methods by challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-21T09:55:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.