Beyond Affinity: A Benchmark of 1D, 2D, and 3D Methods Reveals Critical Trade-offs in Structure-Based Drug Design

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14283v1
• Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 16:19:39 GMT
• Title: Beyond Affinity: A Benchmark of 1D, 2D, and 3D Methods Reveals Critical Trade-offs in Structure-Based Drug Design
• Authors: Kangyu Zheng, Kai Zhang, Jiale Tan, Xuehan Chen, Yingzhou Lu, Zaixi Zhang, Lichao Sun, Marinka Zitnik, Tianfan Fu, Zhiding Liang,
• Abstract summary: Currently, the field of structure-based drug design is dominated by three main types of algorithms: search-based algorithms, deep generative models, and reinforcement learning.<n>We establish a benchmark to evaluate the performance of fifteen models across these different algorithmic foundations.
• Score: 41.856154493234065
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Currently, the field of structure-based drug design is dominated by three main types of algorithms: search-based algorithms, deep generative models, and reinforcement learning. While existing works have typically focused on comparing models within a single algorithmic category, cross-algorithm comparisons remain scarce. In this paper, to fill the gap, we establish a benchmark to evaluate the performance of fifteen models across these different algorithmic foundations by assessing the pharmaceutical properties of the generated molecules and their docking affinities and poses with specified target proteins. We highlight the unique advantages of each algorithmic approach and offer recommendations for the design of future SBDD models. We emphasize that 1D/2D ligand-centric drug design methods can be used in SBDD by treating the docking function as a black-box oracle, which is typically neglected. Our evaluation reveals distinct patterns across model categories. 3D structure-based models excel in binding affinities but show inconsistencies in chemical validity and pose quality. 1D models demonstrate reliable performance in standard molecular metrics but rarely achieve optimal binding affinities. 2D models offer balanced performance, maintaining high chemical validity while achieving moderate binding scores. Through detailed analysis across multiple protein targets, we identify key improvement areas for each model category, providing insights for researchers to combine strengths of different approaches while addressing their limitations. All the code that are used for benchmarking is available in https://github.com/zkysfls/2025-sbdd-benchmark

Related papers

• SAM 3D Body: Robust Full-Body Human Mesh Recovery [65.0108906331903]
  We introduce SAM 3D Body (3DB), a promptable model for single-image full-body 3D human mesh recovery (HMR)<n>3DB estimates the human pose of the body, feet, and hands.<n>It is the first model to use a new parametric mesh representation, Momentum Human Rig (MHR), which decouples skeletal structure and surface shape.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-17T20:26:37Z)
• Comparing Model-agnostic Feature Selection Methods through Relative Efficiency [8.870380386952993]
  We present a theoretical comparison under three model settings: linear models, non-linear additive models, and single index models that mimic a single-layer neural network.<n>Our theoretical results, along with empirical findings, demonstrate that GCM-related methods generally outperform LOCO under suitable regularity conditions.<n>Our simulations and real data analysis include widely used machine learning methods such as neural networks and gradient boosting trees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-19T20:55:43Z)
• AI-Assisted Colonoscopy: Polyp Detection and Segmentation using Foundation Models [0.10037949839020764]
  In colonoscopy, 80% of the missed polyps could be detected with the help of Deep Learning models.<n>In the search for algorithms capable of addressing this challenge, foundation models emerge as promising candidates.<n>Their zero-shot or few-shot learning capabilities, facilitate generalization to new data or tasks without extensive fine-tuning.<n>A comprehensive evaluation of foundation models for polyp segmentation was conducted, assessing both detection and delimitation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T14:20:53Z)
• Benchmark on Drug Target Interaction Modeling from a Structure Perspective [48.60648369785105]
  Drug-target interaction prediction is crucial to drug discovery and design. Recent methods, such as those based on graph neural networks (GNNs) and Transformers, demonstrate exceptional performance across various datasets. We conduct a comprehensive survey and benchmark for drug-target interaction modeling from a structure perspective, via integrating tens of explicit (i.e., GNN-based) and implicit (i.e., Transformer-based) structure learning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T16:56:59Z)
• Structure-based Drug Design Benchmark: Do 3D Methods Really Dominate? [26.854392279443086]
  Cross-algorithm comparisons in structure-based drug design are scarce. We show that 1D/2D methods achieve competitive performance compared with 3D-based methods that use the 3D structure of the target protein explicitly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T15:37:14Z)
• Latent Semantic Consensus For Deterministic Geometric Model Fitting [109.44565542031384]
  We propose an effective method called Latent Semantic Consensus (LSC) LSC formulates the model fitting problem into two latent semantic spaces based on data points and model hypotheses. LSC is able to provide consistent and reliable solutions within only a few milliseconds for general multi-structural model fitting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T05:35:38Z)
• Universal Domain Adaptation from Foundation Models: A Baseline Study [58.51162198585434]
  We make empirical studies of state-of-the-art UniDA methods using foundation models. We introduce textitCLIP distillation, a parameter-free method specifically designed to distill target knowledge from CLIP models. Although simple, our method outperforms previous approaches in most benchmark tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T16:28:29Z)
• Revisiting the Evaluation of Image Synthesis with GANs [55.72247435112475]
  This study presents an empirical investigation into the evaluation of synthesis performance, with generative adversarial networks (GANs) as a representative of generative models. In particular, we make in-depth analyses of various factors, including how to represent a data point in the representation space, how to calculate a fair distance using selected samples, and how many instances to use from each set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T17:54:32Z)
• Reinforced Genetic Algorithm for Structure-based Drug Design [38.134929249388406]
  Structure-based drug design (SBDD) aims to discover drug candidates by finding molecules that bind to a disease-related protein (targets) We propose Reinforced Genetic Algorithm (RGA) that uses neural models to prioritize the profitable design steps and suppress random-walk behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-28T22:59:46Z)
• Few-Shot Named Entity Recognition: A Comprehensive Study [92.40991050806544]
  We investigate three schemes to improve the model generalization ability for few-shot settings. We perform empirical comparisons on 10 public NER datasets with various proportions of labeled data. We create new state-of-the-art results on both few-shot and training-free settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-29T23:43:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.