Mixture-of-Experts Models in Vision: Routing, Optimization, and Generalization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.15021v1
• Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 14:22:25 GMT
• Title: Mixture-of-Experts Models in Vision: Routing, Optimization, and Generalization
• Authors: Adam Rokah, Daniel Veress, Caleb Caulk, Sourav Sharan,
• Abstract summary: We study MoE behavior in an image classification setting, focusing on predictive performance, expert utilization, and generalization.<n>We compare dense, SoftMoE, and SparseMoE classifier heads on the CIFAR10 dataset under comparable model capacity.<n>Both MoE variants achieve slightly higher validation accuracy than the dense baseline while maintaining balanced expert utilization through regularization.<n>We find that SoftMoE exhibits higher sharpness by these metrics, while Dense and SparseMoE lie in a similar curvature regime, despite all models achieving comparable generalization performance.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures enable conditional computation by routing inputs to multiple expert subnetworks and are often motivated as a mechanism for scaling large language models. In this project, we instead study MoE behavior in an image classification setting, focusing on predictive performance, expert utilization, and generalization. We compare dense, SoftMoE, and SparseMoE classifier heads on the CIFAR10 dataset under comparable model capacity. Both MoE variants achieve slightly higher validation accuracy than the dense baseline while maintaining balanced expert utilization through regularization, avoiding expert collapse. To analyze generalization, we compute Hessian-based sharpness metrics at convergence, including the largest eigenvalue and trace of the loss Hessian, evaluated on both training and test data. We find that SoftMoE exhibits higher sharpness by these metrics, while Dense and SparseMoE lie in a similar curvature regime, despite all models achieving comparable generalization performance. Complementary loss surface perturbation analyses reveal qualitative differences in non-local behavior under finite parameter perturbations between dense and MoE models, which help contextualize curvature-based measurements without directly explaining validation accuracy. We further evaluate empirical inference efficiency and show that naively implemented conditional routing does not yield inference speedups on modern hardware at this scale, highlighting the gap between theoretical and realized efficiency in sparse MoE models.

Related papers

• M-Loss: Quantifying Model Merging Compatibility with Limited Unlabeled Data [9.502531621979694]
  We introduce Merging-ensembling loss (M-Loss), a novel evaluation metric.<n>M-Loss quantifies the compatibility of merging source models using very limited unlabeled data.<n>Our theoretical analysis and empirical evaluations demonstrate that incorporating M-Loss into the merging process significantly improves the alignment between merged models and model ensembling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T12:03:36Z)
• ORGEval: Graph-Theoretic Evaluation of LLMs in Optimization Modeling [18.8099769877788]
  ORGEval is a graph-theoretic evaluation framework for assessing Large Language Models' capabilities in formulating linear and mixed-integer linear programs.<n>We show that ORGEval can successfully detect model equivalence and produce 100% consistent results across random parameter configurations.<n>Our results reveal that although optimization modeling remains challenging for all LLMs, DeepSeek-V3 and Claude-Opus-4 achieve the highest accuracies under direct prompting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-31T16:35:52Z)
• Nonparametric Data Attribution for Diffusion Models [57.820618036556084]
  Data attribution for generative models seeks to quantify the influence of individual training examples on model outputs.<n>We propose a nonparametric attribution method that operates entirely on data, measuring influence via patch-level similarity between generated and training images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T03:37:16Z)
• Model Utility Law: Evaluating LLMs beyond Performance through Mechanism Interpretable Metric [99.56567010306807]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have become indispensable across academia, industry, and daily applications.<n>One core challenge of evaluation in the large language model (LLM) era is the generalization issue.<n>We propose Model Utilization Index (MUI), a mechanism interpretability enhanced metric that complements traditional performance scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T04:09:47Z)
• Learning Mixtures of Experts with EM: A Mirror Descent Perspective [28.48469221248906]
  Classical Mixtures of Experts (MoE) are Machine Learning models that involve the input space, with a separate "expert" model trained on each partition.<n>We study theoretical guarantees of the Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithm for the training of MoE models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-09T03:44:09Z)
• On Least Square Estimation in Softmax Gating Mixture of Experts [78.3687645289918]
  We investigate the performance of the least squares estimators (LSE) under a deterministic MoE model. We establish a condition called strong identifiability to characterize the convergence behavior of various types of expert functions. Our findings have important practical implications for expert selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T12:31:18Z)
• A PAC-Bayesian Perspective on the Interpolating Information Criterion [54.548058449535155]
  We show how a PAC-Bayes bound is obtained for a general class of models, characterizing factors which influence performance in the interpolating regime. We quantify how the test error for overparameterized models achieving effectively zero training error depends on the quality of the implicit regularization imposed by e.g. the combination of model, parameter-initialization scheme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T01:48:08Z)
• Sparse MoEs meet Efficient Ensembles [49.313497379189315]
  We study the interplay of two popular classes of such models: ensembles of neural networks and sparse mixture of experts (sparse MoEs) We present Efficient Ensemble of Experts (E$3$), a scalable and simple ensemble of sparse MoEs that takes the best of both classes of models, while using up to 45% fewer FLOPs than a deep ensemble.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-07T11:58:35Z)
• Post-mortem on a deep learning contest: a Simpson's paradox and the complementary roles of scale metrics versus shape metrics [61.49826776409194]
  We analyze a corpus of models made publicly-available for a contest to predict the generalization accuracy of neural network (NN) models. We identify what amounts to a Simpson's paradox: where "scale" metrics perform well overall but perform poorly on sub partitions of the data. We present two novel shape metrics, one data-independent, and the other data-dependent, which can predict trends in the test accuracy of a series of NNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T19:19:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.