LLM is Not All You Need: A Systematic Evaluation of ML vs. Foundation Models for text and image based Medical Classification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.16549v1
• Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 08:35:53 GMT
• Title: LLM is Not All You Need: A Systematic Evaluation of ML vs. Foundation Models for text and image based Medical Classification
• Authors: Meet Raval, Tejul Pandit, Dhvani Upadhyay,
• Abstract summary: multimodal Vision-Language Models (VLMs) and Large Language Models (LLMs) opens up new possibilities for medical classification.<n>This work offers a rigorous, unified benchmark by using four publicly available datasets covering text and image modalities.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The combination of multimodal Vision-Language Models (VLMs) and Large Language Models (LLMs) opens up new possibilities for medical classification. This work offers a rigorous, unified benchmark by using four publicly available datasets covering text and image modalities (binary and multiclass complexity) that contrasts traditional Machine Learning (ML) with contemporary transformer-based techniques. We evaluated three model classes for each task: Classical ML (LR, LightGBM, ResNet-50), Prompt-Based LLMs/VLMs (Gemini 2.5), and Fine-Tuned PEFT Models (LoRA-adapted Gemma3 variants). All experiments used consistent data splits and aligned metrics. According to our results, traditional machine learning (ML) models set a high standard by consistently achieving the best overall performance across most medical categorization tasks. This was especially true for structured text-based datasets, where the classical models performed exceptionally well. In stark contrast, the LoRA-tuned Gemma variants consistently showed the worst performance across all text and image experiments, failing to generalize from the minimal fine-tuning provided. However, the zero-shot LLM/VLM pipelines (Gemini 2.5) had mixed results; they performed poorly on text-based tasks, but demonstrated competitive performance on the multiclass image task, matching the classical ResNet-50 baseline. These results demonstrate that in many medical categorization scenarios, established machine learning models continue to be the most reliable option. The experiment suggests that foundation models are not universally superior and that the effectiveness of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) is highly dependent on the adaptation strategy, as minimal fine-tuning proved detrimental in this study.

Related papers

• Benchmarking Vision-Language and Multimodal Large Language Models in Zero-shot and Few-shot Scenarios: A study on Christian Iconography [0.764671395172401]
  This study evaluates the capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision Language Models (VLMs) in single-label classification of Christian Iconography.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T09:23:31Z)
• Shadow-FT: Tuning Instruct Model via Training on Paired Base Model [67.20706292627106]
  Large language models (LLMs) consistently benefit from further fine-tuning on various tasks.<n>We propose a novel Shadow-FT framework to tune the Instruct models by leveraging the corresponding Base models.<n>Our proposed Shadow-FT introduces no additional parameters, is easy to implement, and significantly improves performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T05:16:21Z)
• Advancing Single and Multi-task Text Classification through Large Language Model Fine-tuning [29.782832197148487]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been widely used for text classification tasks.<n>This study employed a diverse range of models and methods, varying in size and architecture, and including both fine-tuned and pre-trained approaches.<n>We first assessed the performances of these LLMs on the 20 Newsgroups (20NG) and datasets, comparing them to encoder-only RoBERTa models.<n>We explored the multi-task capabilities of both model types by combining multiple classification tasks, including intent detection and slot-filling, into a single model using data from both datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-11T18:06:44Z)
• SurgeryV2: Bridging the Gap Between Model Merging and Multi-Task Learning with Deep Representation Surgery [54.866490321241905]
  Model merging-based multitask learning (MTL) offers a promising approach for performing MTL by merging multiple expert models. In this paper, we examine the merged model's representation distribution and uncover a critical issue of "representation bias" This bias arises from a significant distribution gap between the representations of the merged and expert models, leading to the suboptimal performance of the merged MTL model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T11:49:40Z)
• Model-GLUE: Democratized LLM Scaling for A Large Model Zoo in the Wild [84.57103623507082]
  This paper introduces Model-GLUE, a holistic Large Language Models scaling guideline.<n>We benchmark existing scaling techniques, especially selective merging, and variants of mixture.<n>We then formulate an optimal strategy for the selection and aggregation of a heterogeneous model zoo.<n>Our methodology involves the clustering of mergeable models and optimal merging strategy selection, and the integration of clusters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T15:55:55Z)
• Replacing Judges with Juries: Evaluating LLM Generations with a Panel of Diverse Models [56.02275285521847]
  We propose to evaluate models using a Panel of LLm evaluators (PoLL) We find that using a PoLL composed of a larger number of smaller models outperforms a single large judge, exhibits less intra-model bias due to its composition of disjoint model families, and does so while being over seven times less expensive.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T15:33:23Z)
• LLM2Vec: Large Language Models Are Secretly Powerful Text Encoders [34.421335513040795]
  Large decoder-only language models (LLMs) are the state-of-the-art models on most of today's NLP tasks and benchmarks. We introduce LLM2Vec, a simple unsupervised approach that can transform any decoder-only LLM into a strong text encoder.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-09T02:51:05Z)
• LLM-augmented Preference Learning from Natural Language [19.700169351688768]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are equipped to deal with larger context lengths. LLMs can consistently outperform the SotA when the target text is large. Few-shot learning yields better performance than zero-shot learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T17:17:27Z)
• The Languini Kitchen: Enabling Language Modelling Research at Different Scales of Compute [66.84421705029624]
  We introduce an experimental protocol that enables model comparisons based on equivalent compute, measured in accelerator hours. We pre-process an existing large, diverse, and high-quality dataset of books that surpasses existing academic benchmarks in quality, diversity, and document length. This work also provides two baseline models: a feed-forward model derived from the GPT-2 architecture and a recurrent model in the form of a novel LSTM with ten-fold throughput.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T10:31:17Z)
• Model-Agnostic Multitask Fine-tuning for Few-shot Vision-Language Transfer Learning [59.38343286807997]
  We propose Model-Agnostic Multitask Fine-tuning (MAMF) for vision-language models on unseen tasks. Compared with model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML), MAMF discards the bi-level optimization and uses only first-order gradients. We show that MAMF consistently outperforms the classical fine-tuning method for few-shot transfer learning on five benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-09T17:26:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.